Member Info for BodRuncie

Julian Hanna, Technical Director, commented:

“I am very pleased to report that a Land Access Agreement has been signed with the Pila Nguru

Native Title Holders.

This is a major milestone for Artemis which should allow heritage surveys

to commence for planned on-ground exploration, including initial drilling and gravity surverys.

On behalf of Artemis, I would like to thank the Pila Nguru Directors and their advisers, Central

Desert Native Title Services for their support in progressing the Agreement in a timely manner.

We look forward to reporting progress of this exciting project in coming weeks.”

Trump is bad at capitalism and the wheels are coming off the US free-market economy.

Despite hitting a new ATH today, MKA is still cheap!

Placing shares?

LOL!

:)

The board are being a little coy, but are clearly signposting where they think this is heading.

And aligning themselves with shareholders too.

They radiate confidence.

The previous £12 bid, which was rightfully rejected, comprised £10 worth of shares in an unlisted company, and just £2 cash.

A £12 all-cash offer would be a materially different proposition.

But I still think £12 is too low. The share price did hit £22 way back when, but that might be too high.

I'll hedge my bets and say somewhere between the two!

I was invested in KINO when it was bought out with a low-ball offer.

The company buying KINO made a low-ball bid, but with loads of options, offers and deal-sweeteners for this existing bod.

The bod accepted the low-ball offer, because they were sorted with the "extras", while us PIs were shafted, the company being sold for nearly half of what it could have achieved within 12-24 months.

KINO's board were otherwise skilled, competent and trustworthy to run a quality business. No indication that they were only in it for themselves, and not seeking to maximise shareholder value.

I'm not saying this will happen with BOOM, but I wouldn't have said it would have happened in KINO, until it did.

If a potential buyer is serious, they will probably want to do it before RNSs are released that show BOOM's revenue really taking off, because they can point to the historic (and lower) revenues/profits and try to get away with a lower bid.

Just words of caution, speaking from experience.

It's always best to hedge a bet when projecting revenue/profits.

There are always unforeseen hitches, issues and delays. Problems with weather, equipment breakdown, natural disaster, global macro events.

Even when selling, maybe HEX sell in bulk for a discount to a single customer.

But if you project and assume 100%, you'll almost always fall short. Better to under promise and over perform.

Thank you very much for sharing your research! For taking the time to do it, and then being generous enough to share it.

The quality of posters on this board is top notch, one of the best around.

Yup, the order should be to prioritise:

1. Selling the Helium from Rudyard.

2. Using the cash to go back to Ingomar

3. Sell Helium from Ingomar

4. Sell Hydrogen from Ingomar

5. Use that cash to go after the oil.

If it all pans out, £1 will look like a bargain :)

They can have my MKA shares now for £2 each, but if they wait it'll cost 'em!

Looking less likely to be RIO.

Their recent corporate restructuring plan will have them ditch their fringe metals and focus more specifically on just 3 metals (but not titanium). There's kind of an odds & ends section under the new structure, but seems more like legacy stuff being phased out.

Could be a massive corporate double-bluff, but we should realistically consider the possibility of it not being RIO.

The main thing AudioBoom has to offer isn't its roster of podcasts but the IP and tech behind their advertising methodology.

That makes BOOM worth exponentially more to the bigger players in this space, because not only will they acquire BOOM, they will also be able to apply that IP and tech to their existing roster of podcasts.

*there

Looks like I was wrong about their being hidden selling pressure then.

Mea culpa!

No need to agree to disagree on this, Esduk, we can both agree I was wrong :)

Just had a Corporate Action message via Interactive Investor, telling me that 4D Pharma plc has been dissolved and the shares are now deemed worthless. The shares will be removed from my account.

Well, I was a mug for going in so big here a few years ago. I liked the science and trusted the mgmt knew what they were doing. They had a lot of skin in the game. Turns out we all got played.

The liquidators played a real blinder here. Milking the company for fees until there was nothing left for anyone else.

I should have bought shares in the liquidators instead of 4D!

Good luck to everyone with the rest of your holdings and I hope you make it all back :)

I'm loaded to the gills with MKA but I find myself still wondering if I should add just a little bit more... lol.

@eviking.

Ig looks v interesting. I'm with ii (recently forced transfer from jarvis/x-o closing), but looking around for alternatives.

ig offer no custody fee (if you make 3 trades per quarter), no commission on trades... what am i missing? How do they make money?

Customers would need to pay for things like hardcopies of company reports, etc... but how do they stay in business?

Genuinely curious, and I can't seem to find out from their website! lol

Maybe they bought them off another holder (sub-TR-1) ?.

There's been nowhere near 2m shares traded recently!