Member Info for Bobbler

At least 2 of the sells this morning are buys because they are mine.

Oh yes, like a Tsunami down Lilliput Lane.

Been in Sar nearly 15 years, ever wonder what it would be like if you invested elsewhere 😀

15 years ago: If you invested $1,000 in Bitcoin in 2009, your investment would be worth $99 billion. Bitcoin traded at $0.00099 per bitcoin in late 2009, when $1 equaled 1,309.03 bitcoins.

So Surfie to summarise, you have a red nose, a flower that squirts water on your lapel and long shoes.

Allowed not aloud

Balliff - “thought of Santa emptying his sack for us “

Our you aloud to say such things these days?

The snowflake police might find that offensive, particularly as you are assuming Santa is a “He” he might not have a sack. 😀

Guessing that was a buy otherwise they’d have trashed the SP this morning

Potnak, I get what you’re saying. However please tell me what is the purpose of negative sentiment? What do you personally gain from it? You can’t use the likes of Puma as an example of someone being right. Their intention was to drive the SP as low as possible with fear, yes it worked. And I suspect they were connected to a company and not a lone actor.

If your intention is to get a lower entry point then be honest and say so, if as you say it won’t effect the SP then again what is the point? If you’re not happy with the way the company is run then sell up. As you say you don’t understand the science, in which case it’s hard to criticise the BODs strategy as this may well be steered by the science. And before you say it, yes they have made mistakes, but that’s a fact of life. If they produce a product that can be commercialised then we should all benefit.

Morning SOG, you know what they say… you can’t argue with stupid.

I wouldn’t mind if they offered an alternative that actually raised valid objections. It’s just negative what ifs. We all know there is no guarantee of success. I can only assume it is their own insecurities and lack of courage in adversity that fuels their fears of failure. Each to their own.

Meg, don’t hold back, speak your mind 😂😂😂

If I recall correctly, Parker was asked about barriers to striking a deal. He said there are 3 factors. 1- Data, 2- IP and 3 the financial terms. I believe it came across as 1 and 2 or nailed, and we have had offers but we don’t believe they are sufficient. Like a lot of people on here, I believe they have been asked to do the extended tox as a prerequisite to a more satisfactory offer. Tim did stress it would take longer than 16 weeks for review etc, nearer to 6 months. My thought is, if they are in advanced talks, then it’s unlikely the other side would wait for the data to be peer reviewed before sealing a deal. It’s likely that others will then show interest. Based on the fact we are financing the tox studies and can’t see how there could be a first dibs offer on the table if there has been no financial support. I’m hoping a deal will be struck shortly after the tox study is completed. Hope that makes sense.

Rebster, that’s exactly what he said “partner companies”.

Is it possible they have separate partners for different targets? Psoriasis and RA?

Julie, totally agree. Definitely sounds like they are being steered.

Aber, I agree

Have to say the science sounds very good.!

Aber, I think they’re just being sensible and completing the retirement planning stage. Basically they have to work out how long they can drag it out before it’s time to hang up the old lab coat. Probably two more funding rounds and then they can all retire after 20 odd years in the milking parlour 😀😀

Hi PCS1954, fair play I missed that. Hopefully you are right and it’s deliberately low key. Quickly hand me those straws 😂😂

Good morning PCS1954, he has also omitted the “shareholder value” line as well.

Unfortunately, doesn’t appear to say anything we don’t already know.

Basil, some concerning similarities:

“

MGC concluded its full capital restructuring and refinancing, thanks to the backing of a number of strategic, high net worth investors from the United States and Europe. These individuals fully understand the Company’s long-term potential “

1/1000 consolidation!

I hope Parker hasn’t introduced the same HNWI’s!