Member Info for Bobbler

Surfie - as a man much wiser than you once said - “life is like a box of chocolates”

Aber- my thoughts, someone left the gate open at the clown farm and they are all running wild.

In the past Heavy clown sightings was followed by good news, why else leave the circus and spend so much time here.

the board don’t know how lucky they are. they don’t need to look far for a new ceo. there are numerous posters on here who have been telling us how clever they are and what a better job they could do. time to step up lsesar and co, getting those cv’s over. just make sure you make it clear it’s the ceo’s role you’re interested in, otherwise they’ll think you’ve applied to clean the **** houses.

Colbalt - post

RE: 43p paid29 May 2024 13:43

These shares are golden tickets. Trading is risky IMO.

Nothing like a bit of consistency.

*cobalt blue

Colbaltblue- you love to ridicule others for their grammatical errors. Yet your own user name is clearly misspelled, it’s obvious you meant Colbalt blue. Glad you’re not responsible for the analysis of the scientific detail.

Morning SOG, i agree. I was somewhat surprised the SP didn’t react more positively. However, I assume there are a lot of new holders (sub 25p purchases) who waited to see if there was a spike, when it didn’t materialise, they sold and took a healthy profit. Very logical if you’re a short term holder, can’t blame them. I think we will see a gradual rise now as more positive news flows. But who knows? It’s AIM so anything could happen.

The sun is out, the sky is blue.

Sareum I love you ❤️

Funny guy- looking at your message, I think you will probably struggle to read any of the comments.

Potnak, come on, you’ve been here as long as I have.

One minute your buying all the way and up to a £, the next minute your trying to spread fear. You’re trading, why not? we all have. But posting continually differing opinions to try and benefit your own trades is low. And before you say “ my posts will have no effect on the SP.?, why bother then. Come on, let’s have some gentlemanly qualities.

If this is the market punishing SAR for delayed results, please continue 👍

Rebster- be careful, someone will interpret that as a probable cause for the data to be delayed 😂

Lsesar- that’s a fair assessment. It’s not an ideal world, and i don’t dispute the BOD are far from perfect. But from my experience of working in some of the richest and also the poorest parts of the world, nothing is ever perfect, no matter where you are. We will all know the outcome of SAR soon enough.

Lsesar- “This what sober minded investors have read. ”

And the rest read what it said.

The good news is I expect England to win tonight. So based on your interpretation of that statement, they can’t fail………….em

Leasr- my apologies, please copy the BOD. Statement where they say results in qtr 2. My emotions must have got the better of me, I interpreted expected as not a definitive. Much like life expectancy can’t be relied upon to mean you will live to that set age.

Meg, a fair comment, but I personally would rather they spent their time on 1802. My personal opinion is that is also the primary concern of others.

Reality10. You seem to be forgetting we are still in June.

You are right, they should focus more on the admin the molecules will sort themselves out…….

Aber- like I said just my opinion. Lots of companies, far bigger than Sareum go to the wall, it happens all the time and for various reasons. In reality this is a couple of guys, with limited business experience. It should be noted they made a lot of people a significant amount of money. Three years ago they were the dogs undercarriage, now you could be forgiven for thinking they are a bunch of numpties. I just think we need to cut them a bit of slack. The company survived and what we are now waiting on will decide if it was worth all the hassle.

I agree Reality10, it’s not rocket science, that is actually relatively easy, mankind cracked that a long time ago. What these guys are trying to achieve is far more complicated. Personally, I’d rather they be good at the science, the admin will resolve itself. Just my opinion.

I’m surprised people are putting so much emphasis on the BOD meeting the Q2 deadline.

The RNS reads “ · The multiple ascending dose (MAD) study of SDC-1801 is ongoing and topline data from the Phase 1a clinical trial are expected to be available during Q2 2024.”

Are expected to be available, to me anyway, suggests the BOD are at the mercy of others with regards to the date they are able to make it available.

To suggest the BOD will be at fault if it isn’t supplied by the last day in June seems rather short sighted.