RE: Setting the agenda26 Jul 2021 16:38
I get your point Colbatblue, however if they are unchallenged they continue to post regardless and there is a subtle and continuous negativity. Left unchallenged and they will dominate the board and sow negativity. As is evident in said individuals last post. I never ramp this share, I post what I consider to be relevant supporting links (like many others). It is an undisputed fact that if someone is a genuine holder why would they post negativity? There is no logic, arguing with the excuse “I invested but I think it could turn out to be a bad move shortly after” just doesn’t wash. Their agenda is clearly to disrupt and that’s blatantly wrong. So in a nutshell if ignoring them doesn’t work, should we just let them keeping on posting for their own unscrupulous agenda? If one, just one actually posted some genuine well researched argument, then that would be different. But they don’t and that gets on my pointy things. Rant over.