Member Info for bluerill

I'm sorry Mike, I don't think I'm allowed to share Canaccord's piece yet. Hopefully the company can find a way to make it available. In the meantime, as Canaccord is to brokers (ie., top rank), so is Forbes to business publications and I'm sure everyone can find the story here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2020/10/24/why-vanadium-flow-batteries-may-be-the-future-of-utility-scale-energy-storage/#f094af023056

From: News Alert (BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEX G) At: 10/24/20 11:01:34
Subject: Forbes: Why Vanadium Flow Batteries May Be The Future Of Utility-Scale Energy Storage
Forbes: Why Vanadium Flow Batteries May Be The Future Of Utility-Scale Energy Storage

generally that means Glencore or Trafigura

no you don't.

Invinity Energy Systems Rated New Speculative Buy at Canaccord

(Bloomberg) -- Canaccord Genuity initiated coverage of Invinity Energy Systems Plc with a recommendation of speculative buy.
PT set to 200 pence, implies a 67% increase from last price. Invinity Energy Systems average PT is 198 pence.

No, the deal isn't closed and there is still some conditionality around due diligence. However, what needs to be 'read properly' are the AIM disclosure rules. If you do that you'll realise that the content standards of such an announcement basically legally preclude 'wheeling in African Del Boys' or other obvious efforts to deceive. In fact, the company WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO EVEN PUBLISH SUCH AN RNS in the first place if the NOMAD had not judged the financing deal to be HIGHLY LIKELY to close. Under the current incredibly stringent regulations, management at not just the company's board, but the NOMADs as well, are PERSONALLY liable for the sort of deceptions that some posters allege here. No way on earth or in heaven KEFI are allowed to put out this RNS if it weren't deemed highly likely to close. Period

Apparently, neither is knowing anything about how the stock market works, having a clue about the difference between a 'price target' and the market price, or not being a general prolapse. Sure enough. Seems like just about anyone can post here

sorry, correction: '.....that doesn't mean they 'must' be converted into EQUITY......'

Wow, Cranleigh and Rollin are quite right and bigkahuna you are dangerously wrong. Of course there's debt. The convertible has a maturity date, like all bonds, convertible or straight debt, but that doesn't necessarily mean they 'must' be converted into debt. The key of course is the conversion price. Because its so low - 6p - of course the holder will convert, though in the meantime there is no incentive for him to do so as he is receiving/will receive some modest interest until maturity (again, because this is debt). Should some unfortunate circumstances befall the company before that maturity in March 2021 however, and the shares collapse to below 6p, then the holder would no longer be incentivised to convert and the company would indeed owe him £330k. Because, you know, it's debt. The key for the bulls is that this is a tiny principle amount relative to company's market cap, so it really doesn't matter one way or the other.

https://www.power-technology.com/news/california-energy-commission-picks-vanadium-instead-of-lithium-batteries-for-major-storage-project/

More than the cash, even more than the 4-for-4-with-4-different-partners, this is the California Energy Commission giving their early imprimatur to V flow; effectively validating that it has a place in the mix. At a miserly 100m market cap, that is all we need at this stage, people

nice

moved yesterday, then US dumped so Europe is cautious this morning, plus its illiquid, plus 5% is a decent start......give it time

yes, but what about Coventry?!?! will no one speak for coventry???

alfa - what the hell are you doing over here when you should be at least partly over on the IES board helping me horsewhip that relentless yellow troll???

oh, and by the way, for those here who actually care that IES is a listed company: once again the 'storage' space is on fire especially in the US (despite yesterday's big fall in the market), a market where we now have a high-profile toehold but whose institutional investors have certainly not yet discovered us. WARNING: again - that comment was strictly targeted at people who invest in shares with the knowledge that when the price goes up, they make money

http://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20201007:nRSG3006Ba

Doesn't the CEC know that Invinity won't be included in Coventry?? The fools. 4 times out of 8 projects chosen no less

cancel your account

....who is interested, check out page 14 of the company's half year results presentation for an update on the company's progress and plans in Oxford and as for this cretin's latest 'massive negative' pulled directly from his butt crack regarding Coventry, email the company and ask why they were 'left off'. I did.....

The seemingly sudden price move in Invinity is just catching up to the 'real' price. 100-115p was a silly indication as the shares were very well bid at 110p for most of yesterday and today already, but market makers were a bit slow to react. Company is conducting series of meetings post-results with institutions at present, as Larry alluded to in his webinar/podcast, and it looks like it has generated a bit of buying interest.

Wow. That's what you got out of all that? That it's about who insulted whom the most? Really? And then you're going to throw in your 'pretend its not me' game for good measure? Instead you think its more plausible that some random new poster whom I never engaged with on this site - you - just happens to arrive on this particular company's board and without so much as a 'how do you do' jumps in to harangue me for being mean to another complete stranger with absolutely no context? Ah yes, totally not delusional. Oh, and by the way, you left out 'insane' from your latest list of my insults in my last post. I definitely called you insane.....because you are totally like, insane.