RE: Timeline19 Aug 2024 16:45
Hi Thebold,
I agree that additional cash may now be required to drill MOU5, due largely to significant delays and their associated cost.
I would prefer the company to focus all of its attention and remaining capital on extensively and comprehensively testing all identified horizons across 1, 3 and 4, which represent the lowest risk route to a significantly higher SP - mitigating the impact of further dilution, if so required.
Should the JC at 4 not flow, re-entry of MOU2 could provide a near term incentive, necessary for a successful placement. Conversely, success at 4 would create a huge tailwind into 5, capable of clearing a £3/4 million raise with ease.
Significant success at 1 and 3 reframes the question again. There are options.
The nearm-term risks are formation - volumes/flow, rather than dilution imo.