Member Info for Blueballsnall

Great so no body to answer for two weeks, that's crass, no one can or should agree that is acceptable.

Jjal did you email Boyle or the info ad dress

Probably why my last few mails have been ignored, not good to be put on to someone who will know f all.

Bs15, we have the main play of nitrogen which will come soon. So shouldn't ,most companies whose involved in Colorado stock has fallen already I'd say including HNR, but who knows if money to be made games will be played.

HD, the number of vertical wells on the Kansas acreage could be getting up-to as high as Denver, on 1500 + acres wouldn't you think, it all depends on proving the resource over the acquired acreage. If one well could fund the companies outgoing what could 50 plus do. The first well may well be flowing as they have stated that they are removing the argon and that it looking promising.if the nitrogen isn't flowing how do you prove the process. I asked this to the company but not no reply, as they probably couldn't answer. Any thoughts?

I still don't understand why all the fuss is around Colorado. Please take a look at the risk reward graph in the last HNR presentation . Kansas rates as the highest return for the lowest risk,this is the play the bod must deliver. Low cost low risk near term revenue flow that can put the company on a positive .

Baba ,Robert did answer most of that in the vox pod cast.

N26 I sent an email asking about that, basically is well flowing to enable this process, unfortunately since Eric was his picture on the web site has stopped answering, must hav gone to his head. But for me the gas must be flowing for this looking at the process on the net. There is only 0.05% helium and less argon, so to say it's proceeding well surely must be flowing to prove viability

We need the board to deliver some sort of positive on Kansas not a comment in the editors notes. this company had been given a lifeline with the low cost development of Kansas compared the the other plays and the possible near term revenue stream. The nitrogen purity, the flow rate the low cost development all fell nicely, come on they can't have passed this chance up.weve got a proven well that can deliver min $12,500 a day since June with maybe x number more possible, it can pay it's self off in weeks. If this chance is missed the board need a right Royal scr..ing.maybe time to get prince Phillip fit.

Dbh I'm with you on a placing may well happen, but the bod need to deliver the start Of The kansas project first .when east denver is flowing ( and maybe 16 further wells there )and the first sales of nitrogen are signed up the price should rerate,and depending on the size of Kansas will be how much.

Nitrogen prices doing OK.

I agree that the development plans of Kansas should be in the public domain, we must have a plan so let's welease it Wobert ,we've been in advanced talks to sell nitrogen for 6+ weeks, that from company figures is $500k ,come on were wready to wummble Pwicey.

Sorry status on hold.. So no movement there

Thres16 highland permits applications in Arapaho county........ https://cogcc.state.co.us/permits/permitsPending.aspx/?&county=

So which fund tracker you on about tracker the ftse 100 or something a bit off piste

Can't believe people fell for this utter tripe,back in your stable dobbin, new poster posting utter junk

Looks like anything over 14.05 at the moment is a buy to me from the declarations made on the board . Wonder if Charles Lynas has been increasing his stake

Interesting that it stated business will move to powder river basin on the Montana Wyoming border..as RP was saying on the pod cast billions of barrels of water will be required...we seem to have it in the muddy formation at $1/$3 barrel ...may prove interesting

So if 74 passed and 112 passed, is it that we own the rights on these leases so would seek compensation from the state for resource loss. If both these pass Colorado's in one big mess, no oil and compensation to all land owners, sounds like something the American public would vote thro. I don't want an oil rig near me but I want the money for the oil it could deliver. SeemS it could be a win to me as the land could be deemed to be worth far more than weve payed, but bankrupt the local government.p

I've listened a couple of times now. What comes to the fore is that he mentions the cost of land per acre at $5000/10000 even $20000. 4800 acres at $5000 is $24m . So are we buying up land for a third party (True) who are paying us for those services,as we've stated we're not going to be drilling. So we sort out the land parcels, permits multi pads etc, Plus a cut on production and maybe water supplies. I just can't fathom how we could have put the money down to get this amount of acreage,so someone is surely backing the project already.