Member Info for Blueballsnall

I thought the gas organic certificate was granted hence D8 take over

ED ,with wti rising towards $60, and IP flow rates increasing, with higher pressure from two Of The wells indicating higher flow rates ED looking good just need to get the extra wells over the line. I still think the action on the Cogcc web site this month shows this is moving in the right direction.

Just as they're coming over to the UK I don't think so they'd have a lynching posse after them. Not very funny lloydie, or you looking to increase your holding at a lower price

Just experienced what it can do to peeps in here wow mad

So no takers, well take most peoples unfavourite figure 7.5% Of The market even then it would be $144m. So let's see what happens. Never been into drugs but I'll make an exception in this case..

Circa 3,000,000 canabsis plants in North America(legal ones anyway), 3m ÷50plantsx$8000x 4 crops cycles per year. 10% of the market. Get your calcs out any one, plus maybe Rare type argon at $10k per Kg. Plus sell the rest if the nitrogen produced for $7 mfc. Kansas could be enormous, let's see what happens.

The. First two wells time v flow rate increase.
637bpd 10th Nov
1022bpd 15th Nov
1771bpd 4th Dec...
So if following the first two wells,flow rates to increase ,but at a slower rate True won't be looking the headline figures just the best EUR for the wells. Let's see The 4600bpd was on 25feb with a less aggressive opening Of The choke let's say maybe new figures out 25th March , I would say this is a strong possibility. No mention Of the Argon/Helium Extraction on site in Kansas, or the cannabis crop trials,($8000 for 50 plants) Of The nitrogen hydrogen gas mix(organic cert applied for),this is coming to a conclusion, how many cannabis plants in North America x million. No mention of on site water recycle play which seems to be cheaper and greener than current process used.

Well two scenarios there one Cogcc decided they already ruled on this(so why ever was it put on agenda),or a last minute deal come to that needs on father Cogcc intervention.very strange all this with the other well applications being filed then withdrawn, we'll known pretty soon guess

With this on the agenda for Next Week could be the first of a few bits of news for HNR in march I'm thinking this is maybe why the 4wells on 15/16 were pulled let's hope so, as these section would have 16 well adding to the 7.5% free carry.then hopefully the plant trial end of March with maybe deal thrown In(need the organic very for that).

Well HNR on it asking for a resolution to the renegade issue let's hope they come down on our side this time and put a stop to this

Sorry bout that bit of rubbish

Or just any to turn up before the news.before the uk investor show, they're attending.wouls w

Also hope on sections 31,32,33,34as highlands proposals for 16 wells have appeared on the docket as well.

(Operator No. 90450)
James Parrot & Jillian Fulcher
Request for an order to among other things: authorize additional wells on lands identified below.

Application lands: Township 5 South, Range 64 West, 6th P.M. Section 15: All Section 16: All..

637bpd 10th Nov
1022bpd 15th Nov
1771bpd 4th Dec...
So if following the first two wells,flow rates to increase. True won't be looking for headline figures just the best EUR for their investment, and at probably to date circa +$45m, plus 4 further wells in niobrara A formation an $20m, which is nigh on as nailed on as possible, as we own the lease,and true asking our permission through the Cogcc meeting in March. So looking at the production figures above let's see where the final Production high is, from those dates two to three weeks,maybe supurise a few on here,or probably not, dyor .

637bpd 10th Nov
1022bpd 15th Nov
1771bpd 4th Dec...
So if following the first two wells,flow rates to increase. True won't be looking for headline figures just the best EUR for their investment, and at probably to date circa +$45m, plus 4 further wells in niobrara A formation an $20m, which is nigh on as nailed on as possible, as we own the lease,and true asking our permission though the Cogcc meeting in two weeks time. Plus maybe the further areas (31,32,33,34)south with renegades plans having dropped off the docket and replaced by highlands proposals for these areas.

By the looks of it Time for another ID creation JJAL.

If theres no delay with True oil informing HNR with the IP results this imo these are looking very favourably to be in line or exceed the current wells average, and with True asking to drill(invest) more wells on the pad tells it's own story :o)

Can't see what all the fuss is about with substps find with True wanting to drill more wells, there's only one outcome with the IP good to fantastic range or why would the want to invest another $20m+ , it's a no brained..for those that don't know True Oil is a family owned billion $ company.. They don't waste their cash

The Thought is they (true)are going to target a different level shale formation, Niobrara A ,not the B or C formations. From what was seen on the videos from ED, the wells we're deemed nigh on perfectly spaced, by using different isotopes to see if there had been any communications from well to well. Domingo Maya seemed pleased with the results. So as the target formation is different wouldn't think there would be an issue with the existing wells. Is that thinking Correct?