Member Info for BlaimThrower

I literally work in this field and guess what my specialty is? Networking.

That paper has nothing at all to do with CTEA and what they claim to be able to do. The paper is about how currently the comms to satellites use a proprietary protocol called CCSDS. So only certain places have the ability to download the data but then to send it on it has to be encapsulated in an IP packet. So it means the end user is having to rely on these special systems to get the data for them and then its slow,for end users of the data to process each packet as it has to be retrieved from its IP wrapper before they can get to the actual data.

NASA are looking to change this so people can talk to satellites directly over an IP network i.e the internet. Its not an easy thing to do though because of the unreliable nature of the Internet and IP networks. Especially wireless. Packet loss, latency, reliance on fragmentation and retransmission are many factors theyre highlighting as being obstacles to overcome.

I digress. They're working on the way they can talk to satellites so its easier for more people to get data from them. Blockchain is not a communications protocol so has nothing at all to do with that project or nasa in any way. Blockchain is a way of storing the data and the paper makes no reference to any suggested method of storing the data thats downloaded. Most likely because that's not their concern.

Nice try but you chose the worst possible subject to call me out on. I'm an infrastructure engineer with a speciality in networking and storage of over 15 years. This is my bread and butter.

Could you please explain to me how that is in any way pioneering? Has no one else ever stored data from satellites? Hs no-one else ever used block chain. Blockchain that you can buy off the shelf as IaaS from any major cloud provider?

https://aws.amazon.com/blockchain/

If you get the update you ask for, as to what CTEA has been up to the SP will probably drop even further. Silence is probably better for you than an update that they STILL haven't made any money and are drifting closer and closer to delisting.

CCS

You're referring to "being shortlisted" for a government tender. How many were shortlisted? Do they actually jave a chance of winning it? It states big but how big is that in terms of financials?

Multiple placings this year, share consolidation, 6 figure losses, contract RNS' with no figures in, not hitting revenue targets. They are bringing in some money, unlike CTEA, but I wouldn't be touching them. Too many alarm bells ringing.

Theyre not allowed to hold back. If there is news that could affect the SP they have to release it. Bearing in mind they have RNS'd browsing the gov.uk website and walking past a local counciler on the street in the past I doubt they would hold back on literally anything.

Also. Jonesrichard is one of the most dishonest people on these forums. Please look at their posts history before you even think of believe anything they say.

"I believe the company will get contracts".

So basically you're gambling on a hunch. Just a reminder that I never bought any CTEA shares.

"I haven't sold at a loss on any share."

And this just shows what a liar you are. I doubt anyone who never loses on a share is interested on these boards. They will be off driving their Bentleys around their country estate.

ha ha. You've got nothing have you if that's all you keep coming back with. We're here to talk about CTEA, not me. I could go through the boards you post on and find shares you used to post on where you clearly made a loss. What would be the point of that though? Does it make my arguement against CTEA any stronger? No. I said I took a loss on a punt on a garbage share. Maybe I should have stayed in and tried to convince people to buy based on nothing at all. Like you're doing with CTEA.

So getting onto Mitch's question. What you saying?

Here's Bradley. He must have come on here to answer Mitch's question. Or is he attacking me again to distract once again?

Just take a look at the last week. Look at all the people saying this is going to the moon. Only for it to fly back down. This will happen again over the next week.

Not going to answer Mitch's question Bradley? I have only ever had 2 usernames on this forum. I used to be crizmo but some people were accusing me of hiding my identity because my Twitter handle was different. So I switched to an account matching my Twitter handle for complete transparency. If you look back you'll see that I've been warning people from the very day they issued the RNS about Cov-ID

You're like Boris Johnson. You focus on one thing to distract from another. In your case it's throwing accusations about me being a bitter former holder (incorrect) so you don't have to answer the question of the business case for CTEA.

I've never owned CTEA and am in no way connected to Checktest. I know you don't like hearing that truth but that's what it is. SAE is still below where I sold it so that 33% rise means nothing. It's a failing business and I was honest that it was just a [ure gamble when I mentioned buying it. It's the same as someone who bought this pile of rubbish at 6p. Do you think they are kicking them selves when it got pumped last week and rose 60% before being dumped and falling back again? They'd still be hugely down.

The fact that I've been honest about my losses should make me more trustworthy than people who never mention when they lose. I didn't have to mention that. I could have kept quiet but I was making a point that I understand people taking a punt on garbage stocks. Just as long as they know they're garbage and are prepared to take the risk. Then there's people like you who would have us believe CTEA will do big things, even after 17 years of doing nothing and there being no evidence that this is changing. That's the sort of advice that's to be avoided. If you'd said you might make some money on a pump like last weeks then can get out I'd get it. You're saying it's a good investment though and it just isn't. We're still all waiting to tell us a buy case for CTEA.

As per usual. People giving advice based on facts are called derampers, trolls, doomsday prophets but nothing is mentioned of the blatant lies and ramping of some posters claiming 2p, news tomorrow, good tech etc..

That's the issue here not me and a few others explaining, with reason, why this is a bad investment. You're happy for those other posts as you want to see the SP go up, even if it's based on rumors and lies. That's when people get sucked in and lose money. When CTEA display the slightest business acumen and look like they have even a slight glimmer of hope of making some profit or progressing their business then I'll cease posting here. Until then, as they rinse investors over and over with placings and misleading RNS, I'll warn people of the dangers of investing in CTEA.

Just watch over the next week as senseless pumpers like Wilfred4412, golddd, cwebb07, eyeguy, bamb, McFish etc. suddenly stop posting on this board. Even though this is supposedly a great company thats going places. Another red day coming today as the pump it up plan didnt work as well as they hoped.

I'd say remember there usernames so you know who not to listen too in future but most of them will be on another username before the next pump elsewhere. Now I'm off to go and read that RNS that was coming this week, announcing something big. I just need to find it first.

Good to see you back Bradley. Mitch is still waiting for you to give your case as to why someone should buy CTEA

And what works were they in Scotland?

YOU
CAN
NOT
SHORT
CTEA

So there are no shorters. There are some people bashing the stock (rightly so in my opinion) but then some like myself and others explaining why this company is useless and this is just another P&D in the looooong line of P&D's that we have seen in this stock.

The statement "Well if they can’t get a slice of it now they never will." applied at the start of the global pandemic. That was almost 2 years ago. So we're well past the point of this being the last chance for CTEA

Its a non story. Thats why no one is discussing it. The NHS apps cover all the bases so little old CTEA will not be getting any business from the government. Plus I bet if you look back through Natham's post, he wil have raised this point many times before, whenever the government has made a covid announcement. Being wrong every single time.

What's not to like? The fact that this is just hot air so you're just gambling your money that lots more lemmings like yourself will pile in and you'll be able to get out with a profit before it crashes back down.

The fact that the company has been going for 17 years and not made a profit or produced a product or any merit that has been adopted by more then 2 or 3 companies on a trial basis.

The fact that they only ever deal with other organisations that are partially owned by guy or are owned by a former CTEA director.

I don't know. Maybe those 3 things to start is what's not to like.

My guess would be some ramping fool like smallcapprick or tops trying to move this so they can get out with their 10% rise or people who have bought into a placing forward selling shares.

They are just guesses. I'd put any amount of my own personal money on this rise amounting to nothing though. An RNS where they still make £0.00 from a deal but it sounds great on paper, at best.

Is it that time of year again. The ramp crew have arrived to ramp this company on no news once again. Is a placing on the way?