RE: Thoughts23 Feb 2019 00:01
The second article is more interesting.
Why would someone on wall street write about a small company trading in HK ?
The two main insider investors are of course Big Jim and Jamie so why not write that ? But I am sure the article is quite true regarding international investors, although I would like to know where he/she gets their information from as to who else is or is not invested. No mention of the huge ************** following the UK launch, unless no one was taking positions as speculated by some here. Was it really just day traders.......about 1.5billion shares traded in a matter of days surely not (and remembering that only 60 to 70% of total shares were available as free float to trade). I don't suppose we will ever get to the bottom of this.
This seems just BS:
The general public, who are mostly retail investors, collectively hold 73% of Regent Pacific Group shares. This size of ownership gives retail investors collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
This is certainly true:
As far I can tell there isn’t analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
Pity he/she didn't list the major share holders (apart from Jim n Jamie) so we can contact them to try and oust the CEO or make a pay reduction.
No mention of the product, so what is the purpose of the article and as mentioned above why would someone on Wall Street want to write about the company ?