Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Nobody (other than you it seems) is even remotely 8nterested in a struggling tat flogger, far more important matters for mainstream news to cover

In that case, daytrade, why do you seem to spend every waking hour obsessing about it. So obsessively that you post in the middle of the night

So daytrade you are banging on about a committee meeting that, as far as we are aware, two out of fifteen companies turned up to and another three gave written evidence to because they couldn't make it, despite probably having months of notice.

A committee that had none of it's original recommendations accepted. A meeting that is so inconsequential that it doesn't even make the news

And you try to make out the Boo rep was incompetent based on a single quote from an article. Do you have any idea how many questions he was asked daytrade or how long he spoke for?

I'd guess not.

Incompetance, faux pax,

I think it's your own performance you should consider, not the performance of a Boohoo employee based on a single quote from an article. Note that the H&M guy also didn't answer the question the Boo guy was asked. He merely stated the proportion of sustainables used now, which I'm sure the Boo guy could equally do.

Yes daytrade it's such an important committee that only two out of fifteen companies could even be bothered to turn up.

If it's so important where does it feature on the BBC news site daytrade.

I don't think I ever said the Leicester site was closed because the cost savings was needed. I think that yet one more dumb claim that you made, that Boo was so desperate for a couple of million quid.

Man, you don't have keep embarrassing yourself, why all this effort to put down a business where you apparently have only a fun punt. It's more than a little sad

Even more stark if you look at the weekly equivalent

7m shares traded per day last year,compared to about 2m this year

It isn't normal trading, that much is obvious.

7m shares traded on this day last year, less than 3m again today.

Why would anyone care daytrade about a committee that had none of it's recommendations accepted five years ago.

Fifteen companies invited, only two turned up. Boo was one of them so obviously taking the issue more seriously than most.

M&S couldn't turn up because they were in Bangladesh, that well known centre of employee rights, now that is something you couldn't make up.

Great to see you have so much time on your hands to seek out irrelevance tho, just a shame that you have to reduce everything to confrontational and argumentative drivel.

Only two real options I think Jeremy.

Either it's a shorter margin trading or someone accumulating for a third party

And once again zero value add from the village idiots

Just when you think daytrade can't possibly embarrass himself any more....

Boo group had a good month all round in website visit growth.

In comparison ASOS was flat.

It's good to see people are looking at multiple pages, it makes them far more likely to buy I think

Daz most likely scenario is increase in debt facility and Forrest takes a stake in one guise or another.

Are you buying in here, be good to have another KOD BOD

The Bishop

What you are clearly missing is both have hit the bottom and are starting an upward retrace

The other thing you are missing is clearly any ability to read a graph.

I could post further but I'm sure you are more expert in bashing the bishop judging by your posts

This and KOD must be two of the most undervalued shares on AIM

Hopefully massive re-rates coming

And I see you completely fail to provide any evidence as to why Frasers are an enforced holder who can't sell because it would send the wrong message.

Are you too thick to see that you then contradict yourself by stating that they could see a path to selling for profit. That would make them anything but an enforced holder by your own logic daytrade.

Look forward to you explaining any of the dumb statements you are making

Congratulations daytrade you have hit a new level of embarrassing.

You have conveniently forgotten that it is you who first ried to predict what Frasers were doing, not me

Frasers have spent the best part of a year building a stake, they have stated their strategy will become clear. Nobody, except a fool, would suggest that this is indicative of an enforced holder.

I see you mention the 45p figure again. Another poster asked you a couple of days ago to justify why you thought this would be a good price. You couldn't do it then, I'm guessing you can't do it now.

All you can do is post angry and aggressive rants daytrade but pls do try to prove me wrong.

And still posting the product of that foetid imagination, so sad

What a load of long winded garbage, why do you waste your time writing this nonsense.

The likes of Frasers, Kamani's and II's buy for the long term, so what evidence do you have that any large investor here is "an enforced holder" who "can't sell because it would give the wrong message".

Let's take Frasers as a simple example. They have bought more than a fifth of the company at an average in the low to mid thirties. Nobody builds this kind of stake with an intention to sell in the short term, because they know it would be an impossibility. They have also gone on record as saying their strategy will become clear over time. So in what way are they an enforced holder daytrade? Let's have your explanation, I'm sure it will be even more embarrassing than yesterday

The answer is absolutely none, it's just your usual abusive and argumentative rubbish.

I thought you couldn't possibly embarrass yourself more than you did yesterday, but congratulations you have managed it.

Hexam your hypothesis only holds true if margin volume is the market makers sole potential source of income from an equity.

By and large it isn't

Generaloz, most people would think there is a clue in the word "principal".

Hexam in that case you must be just about the only trader who doesn't look at range and volume.

Most traders, and Aim is massively skewed to traders, have a window of a few days or weeks at most.

I don't trade here, I trade where there is far more volatility, and there are many such stocks

Hexam if you saw a share being held in a tight range, with a slight down trend and you looked at the price action and volume, would you buy if you were a trader?

I certainly wouldn't