Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Bon Scott, whose post is this?

Hexam, never explain a single thing to coasty. Just a sick parasite, who adds no value whatsoever.

Wow that could be the silliest post i have seen this year

Nicetomichu, to refresh your memory. This is what i asked Smalley to provide the link to. I'd agree he knows a lot of detail, what he wishes to use it for is a totally different question. It seems strange that somebody won't share this information, which is exactly what boards like this are meant to be for.

The company (Harvest) does provide via electronic invoices (DANFE/boleto) individual sales invoice details to ANM for tax collection purposes.

The ANM does produce month by month tax, revenue and in some cases tonnage for all these transactions.

Wyndrum you know that isn't quite true, or even anywhere near the total truth.

Yes the LFT was licensed for professional use and sold a few. and apparently worked effectively for the original covid and variants. However, it was never released for home use in the UK for various reasons, mainly political,which would be my definition of market launch.

So we know that the platform technology actually worked on diagnostics and therapeutics. We know that so far there is a beneficial effect on a small number of trial patients in the real world. So that is as far as the comparison between the two goes.

I'm surprised anybody would see the greater number of cohorts to find a MTD a bad thing, as this simply shows the product is working better than original expectations

Only just gone over half a million, it's genuinely pathetic

Thornogson

Firstly I don't categorise anybody as idiots or non idiots. It's just plain rude and does nothing to encourage an actual debate.

You are correct, there is a significant mismatch between a European fund paying 50p and the current continuing share price decline.

If you understand statistics at all, you can see the platform is doing what it is meant to be doing. We are seeing a rolled up version of lots of core data. So far it is doing exactly what it is meant to do.

I'm very careful with the words I use. I'm not saying it works full stop. The early indications are that it works for some cancers but it is by no means certain how well yet.

Why anybody would expect any more from a safety trial is beyond me.

So we have moved downwards by about 70% in sp terms whilst the trial has done what it is meant to do.

Plain daft.

Some posters seem to wish to see the sp as the be and all, as if markets were fair, rational and open. They aren't

They also wish to compare Ava6000 to the LFT, a product which never even got to market. Why anybody would do that is also beyond me. It's chalk and cheese.

As I keep saying Jeremy, it's all about Frasers

Who the trolls said had given up buying.

Strange friend Hexam has nothing to say about that one either

So glad you agree that revenue is up compared to PRECOVID, which until this year is the only valid comparator.

Read the posts Hexam, I haven't made a comparison Boo Vs M&S. It would be a spurious comparison. My point was in response to the troll stupidity and purely in relation to M&S moving their stores away from the high st which they undoubtedly have.

If you are unable to see the Boo strategy playing out then why not sell up.

You don't think rampant inflation, cost of living crisis and the reduction in the COVID online bubble, which is now reversing, are the major impactors on performance here.

Strange you are unable to attempt to correct any troll nonsense here, ever.

Each to their own

I agree Thornogson that all sides should be heard, its what makes a BB valuable.

However the sp decline here has nothing to do with the performance of AVA6000 in trial, which is progressing as well as could have been envisaged. It's all to do with shorts who are trying to do here what they did to SAR, as i've posted here multiple times over the past couple of months. Sadly, with the lack of oversight on AIM they are currently winning, which is a sick joke.

I've sold most of mine with a view to reinvesting when the slow crawl down stops, which it assuredly will at some point.

Because ultimately the drug and platform is doing exactly what it was supposed to do

Nicetomichu, that wasn't the figure i was referring to and Smalley knows it full well.

I was referring to the sales order figure for April, which is bigger than the Q1 figure in total

The link i asked smalley to post is to the government website which apparently shows invoiced sales for HMI by month.

It seems more than a little strange that he won't share it, just refer to it cryptically to try to paint a negative picture

How many of those stores are now food only and forecourt stores superzero.

As posted previously the high st store presence has been massively scaled back and will be scaled back further

I see you avoid commenting that revenue is massively up on precovid levels, especially when gmv from Debenhams is included

Napth this has the potential to multibag massively quickly but the shares in issue were far less when it was above 3p.

Interesting article thanks SPK

That is only a taste of what will happen in they do IPO.

Full disclosure over its supply chain will be interesting, not to mention the number of copyright claims against it, which our media always seems to ignore

Incorrect per usual superzero

M&S have massively cut back their high st presence and upscaled in premium and out of town locations with far larger stores

https://www.thesun.co.uk/money/27288805/marks-and-spencer-list-store-closure/

Remind me what Boo revenue was precovid

If you had a single iota of market knowledge Bon Scott, you would know that M&S have massively scaled back their actual high street presence

A few years ago M&S was supposedly dead with massive short positions in place

Amazing what a difference a bit of time and a focussed strategy can make

Wow the shorter here obviously isn't happy!

I think it's more a case that the sp is held in a range that FRasers want to buy at and shorts benefit

What were April's figures like Smalley

And didn't you say February was abnormal so it wouldn't be a suprise if March was as well would it?

Maybe rather than talking cryptically you could post the actual link to the figures or the figures themselves

It's simple Jeremy

Frasers