Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Quakerjon, isn't the more appropriate question how much we'd be paying in rent if we hadn't bought it

I'd guess upward of £5m per year

I may not have read the last paragraph of the RNS.

It seems strange to issue new shares when the EBT already owns nearly 5% of the share capital.

Bit back to the original point

Dilution galore and award of nil-cost shares to the board. The shareholder rinseathon continues.

Where is your justification for this complete nonsense

Dilution galore and award of nil-cost shares to the board. The shareholder rinseathon continues.

Bon Scott, still waiting for you to quantify this statement.

Cooler, who are these "lots of failed directors"

The only change recently is the CFO, who I believe is a good appointment

Can't say I'm unhappy.....but wtf?!!!!!!

Nobody knows sinter

Just a very illiquid share, suffered from the vagaries of COVID but a big upside if it gets through successfully to the second half of this year

Should be atleast 20p fair value

Oh dear bon Scott

Did you even look at the list EBT own just under 5% of the share capital.

If you are referring to the other thread, you agreed with another one post wonder that Kamani sold off.

I'm merely correcting another piece of your troll nonsense because his last trade was actually a buy at about £2.40!

I think you will find that Kamanis last trade was a buy.

Great trolling guys!

No need for any recent purchase bon Scott. Just look at the major shareholders list

https://www.boohooplc.com/investors/major-shareholders.htm

Zag, my question was in what way you would expect to see the acceleration, as that is what you stated

Gst is a small business with many things ongoing and they won't be talking about numbers until accounts and projections are ready

I'm not sure the reputable brokers like HL would engage in such nefarious practices.

However there does seem to an inordinate fall for the number of sells. It seems just over 100k sells can take pennies off the sp yet a slightly smaller amount of buys is worth a fraction of a penny.

Fun and games being played indeed

Broke I've already posted numerous times that I think it is totally wrong, I hope it gets challenged and maybe overturned at the AGM and I think we will get lots of bad press and justifiably so.

So I'm not in favour of it and I'm not defending the business.

What I'm doing is challenging the lies that the trolls tell, as you can see from my previous post

Bon Scott I don't take you seriously at all, if anything I find your faux rage mildly amusing.

I simply enjoy pointing out the lies you post.

So let's go back to the supposed dilution you talked about.

These shares will be sourced from the EBT, which already has c4% of the share capital and buys on the open market when it needs more.

So there is no dilution is there Bon Scott?

Just more pointless troll lies.

See how easy and gratifying it is?

Nobody is lashing out apart from you pointless trolls.

I simply asked you to show where this massive dilution is that you talked about.

It doesn't exist does it Bon Scott, just like your imaginary share holding.

You forget as well that the shares issued to the directors yesterday can't be cashed in for a year.

But why let simple facts get in the way of pointless trolling.

As posted before you trolls should stick to chatting amongst yourselves because nobody else takes you seriously

That theory only works in an open and transparent theoretical market James. We all know AIM is anything but that

Zag there has been a few months gap between announcement and acquisition in the past. So it may be a little patience is required

I'm intrigued, how would you expect to see acceleration, given the company is currently preparing it's accounts.

I'd guess one of the reasons Lyttle got so many this year is that the ones he was given a couple of years ago had a vesting price of 80p this May, so obviously he has lost those.

But it's poor that the award is so large and they are awarded at nil cost.

I'd expect a whole load of bad press and justifiably so this time

It's a bit of a shocker tbh Jeremy.

I'm fine with the senior managers awards, it's a competitive job market

However I can't see any justification for the award of four times as many shares as last year to Kamani, Kane and Little. I think this may cause a bit of a stink at the AGM tbh.

I guess the only mitigation is that the shares don't best at all for a year and if performance doesn't improve I can't see Lyttle being there then. I'm also not sure Kane will also be employed by then, given her silence on the investor call.

Funny isn't it

i mean, Shein are infallible apparently lol