Member Info for Bfdinvestor

If we wish to discuss MMs

There are a remarkable number of two part trades appearing late, which also have a third part printed at the correct time. Usually these are intraday shorts imo. As I ve said a few times,somebody doesn't want this to rise

Kat thanks for writing a considered response.

It actually went up to 1.4p after the corporate update.

It is definitely cheap now, £11m market cap is less than 10x revenue, which for a growth company is stupid.

Where I disagree is that history actually does nothing but repeat itself.

Most traders rely to a lesser or greater degree on charts, which by definition are based on history repeating itself

There was a guy who used to post on GST under the name TheeDuke who did it

Interesting to see all those trades ending in 666 and 333. Not to mention the size of the unknowns.

Lots of clandestine positions being taken here ATM.

Hopefully the MMs will start to reflect it before long

Pedro is the guy who called £1.25 for CGNR and £1.50 for Mobico

He either makes dumb calls or prophesies doom

He makes far more sense in the green bin!

Kat why dont you explain why you think it went up.

And why the situation isn't similar now

Looks like Frasers to me.

It's definitely off book

Just shows what a joke the daily volumes are.

Applying for licences has no certainty of success

Crypto I'd suggest you go through the RNS history yourself.

But to one of woffler's points, one of the major licenses expires in 2038, so that would necessitate some hanging around by any potential buyer. Although I'm sure the trolls would jump at the opportunity

(w)Offler did I conflate yours and spiky's posts. One of you mentioned licence scams however.

Silly me, still it's an easy mistake to make as you trolls are all much of a muchness.

If you guys genuinely believe what you post, perhaps you should contact the FCA rather than post here. I doubt that you would have the courage of your supposed convictions though

Funny to see spiky and offler playing troll tennis.

Perhaps one of them could provide examples of where EUA has transferred it's licences amongst different subsidiaries.

Spiky any actual investors would know the duration of the licenses and why, therefore, it's not a subject of discussion.

But, then again, you aren't an investor are you? Despite seemingly living your entire life on this board.

Not as ridiculous as less than 8m shares traded having a greater effect than more than 26m Lloyd!

Actually Spidey they are citing external factors.

Now what do you think they are?

Do you think for instance di minimis or EU regs will hit Boo?

Offler I understand totally what a judge does but you clearly missed my point, which was about impartiality. But more that you chose that example, as you clearly see yourself and little Wolfy as fulfilling that sort of role.

Quite amusing really

@offlerif you have made money why always so negative. Try a little balance for once.

Bookies lose a whole load more complex algos than simple form and plenty of bookies have gone out of business. I used to do some work for a large one.

The role of a judge is to be impartial, so it's quite amusing that you use that as an example for yourself and little Wolfy, who are anything but.

Well I've green boxes that idiot.

He either gets things totally wrong or takes pleasure in spouting doom

Pointless

Actually Wents it is a piece of news some of us wanted to hear.

It's actually good seeing Rob being realistic and not trying to sell this as something it isn't yet.

It's an encouraging start but a long way to go

Well somebody doesn't want this to rise lol.

Another nice little step forward and the market cap still ridiculously low

Great to see the typical troll responses when challenged

Thanks guys you just keep proving my point for me.

Wolfy, if this is a dog of a share, why do you need to keep posting here? Surely there are better things to do with your life.

EUA has been good to me over the years bought years ago between 2-6p and sold in the 20s

Bought a few earlier this year for 2p and sold the majority for 6p, keeping a few on a free carry in case of a sale.

Offler, don't buy your theory at all, but what would be your and Wolfy's "form"

50 billion dollars off their market cap as they cite external factors for slowing sales growth.

And the negative media has only just started