RE: Long term6 Jun 2026 14:51
"Glencore and ZIOC thought a fair price was 4.2p, did you completely miss that ?"
You are being very disingenuous millerston!
It was a fair price for GLEN's holding AT THE TIME bearing in mind circumstances would change!
Obviously, it certainly never put a future value on the Zanaga Project.
As does not the current SP!
You may recall that, at the time, GLEN was perceived by some to be a barrier to any development.
Feeks: I share your view of the RAM raid but suspect the longer term will outlive me! Good luck to you if you're still here to make serious money from your ZIOC investment. At the same time, I certainly wouldn't welcome a mandatory offer of 11p! On the other hand, if the SP were to be stuck around 4p for the next few years 11p looks very attractive! It's such a shame that the ZIOC BOD feels so little empathy with LTHs - we're just irrelevant cannon fodder and it's extremely unfair. I hope extrader succeeds in getting any kind of financial authority to suspend trading in ZIOC while "fairness" is debated. Who would suffer more from a trading suspension? Hopefully the RAM raiders - if not financially then reputationally. "I see you tried to screw the small shareholders but came unstuck! Definite lack of judgment! Not sure I want to do business with you again!" If only... I suspect the actual response will be along the lines of "You win some, you lose some!" with much back-slapping.
Not all BODs treat shareholders with such contempt: as a shareholder of LOGP my interest in the company at the time of suspension has been ring-fenced as regards any future compensation. That was very fair. And very unusual.