Member Info for BeachHut

Irrespective of the merits of this share, it is rather sad that people feel the need to post when they reputedly haven't got a stake in the company.

Just my opinion. Happy Christmas all.

I am sorry, but WTF has this post got to do with the company or the share?!

Don't the potential lenders need the new resources model to be completed before they can wrap up their due diligence?

I do wish the chat had functioning emojis! Simply recommending a post doesn't give the true sentiment ;P

The chat on here cracks me up; it's more entertaining than the TV sometimes.

If you want to know who manufactured the compressors and the kit used, look no further than the GCL website

https://www.gascompressors.co.uk/2021/08/29/gcl-to-supply-two-gas-compressors-for-angus-energy-saltfleetby-project/

and here

https://www.gascompressors.co.uk/2021/08/29/gcl-receives-further-order-for-saltfleetby-project/

All I need now is for "Honest" John to pop up and tell us all there is a new storage tank, flow meter ........................

I'm been an owner of EV's for 3 years - which includes business use around the country - and very happy with them. Sure there are horror stories, but the satisfied customers don't make good headlines!

As for servicing, the only minor headache is the availability of trained technicians at the garages, not any old oily rag can work on them.

This reminds me of the "Wordlord" in Die Hard 4 ..... just saying ;)

Quite simply, it should be "the owners of 3.6 billion shares".

For there to be liable .... "liable allegation that I’m Ruth Hayhurst!"...... first you have to know the identity of the actual person against which the accusation has been made. Without knowing this basic fact there can be no damage to reputation, and no grounds for false accusations. It is purely speculation based on someone's opinion.

Therein lies the fundamental problem with anonymous bulletin boards. You can say what you like unless the person has revealed their true identity.

Kind regards, Basil Brush ;)

Perhaps I am naive in my investing strategy, but when I form an opinion that a stock has little potential for further increases in price, because of inherent factors such as falling production, or continuing financial millstones around the corporate neck, I tend to get out of my position and move on. So I am at a loss why there are people who are so gloomy about the outlook at ANGS and haven't moved on, but like to offer their view on the situation.

Moving from being naive to a tad cynical, could it be that they want to drive the price lower and don't really believe all that they profess?

As one of the LSE commentators recently said, you need a strong stomach to read this Bulletin Board.

Just my coffee time musing! lol

Sadly, it had to be said as it is information that the market should know about. The rest was inevitable.

English onshore existing resources could become more valuable if next month's Supreme Court case goes against the producers. The outworking of such a judgement is potentially wide ranging for all similar industries.

https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2022-0064.html

I think you will find it was the 1988 Tory Government who proposed the break up of power generation and the grid. They then put the nuclear sale on hold when their mates moaned about decommissioning and contamination costs.

Call me a cynic, but I don't rely on the ramblings of anyone - positive or negative.

I've seen it all before years ago.

Saltfleetby is still producing 53% of the UK's on-shore gas production. Not insignificant!

Apologies, wrong board ..ignore!!

Saltfleetby is still producing 53% of the UK's on-shore gas production. Not insignificant!

I bet someone on here, no names, is a bundle of fun on a Friday night in the pub, or should that be the bingo.

Honestly, even a lawyer can split the "t" and dot the "i" of a statement, but the good ones know when they are pushing a pea uphill using their nose.