The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
I have to laugh at any RNS issued by a Lenigas company, they certainly know how to write them ....."I stuck my finger down the hole and it was smeared with oil" (paraphrasing before anyone jumps on me!).
I can say that, as I was one who didn't jump out of LGO in time!
Talk about being selective in your use of a quotation! This is the baseline, not the finger in the air that you portray. In context, the quotation continues:
"We are expecting the well to clean up further which is likely to raise that flow rate in the future. "
Geez, I remember the days it was LGO and "Honest John" was the prophet of all things good, as we waited for new storage tanks, flow meters, and all that cr@p. When this recovers to 7p I am out lol
I learnt a lesson several years ago when invested in LGO. Wait for the profits and don't take as gospel what the prophets say. Following the word of "Honest John" (if anyone else was invested and remembers him) cost me dearly (and also members of the England Cricket team).
Personally, I am sitting and waiting based purely on my own strategy.
BV - firstly, the swampies will need deep pockets. Not just to meet their own legal costs (c£100k), but if they lost the JR they would automatically be liable for the legal costs of the other parties (Secretary of State for the Planning Inspectorate).
They have 6 weeks from the date of the decision to make the JR. A judge will initially consider if there is any substance to the claim worthy of being examined. Then it proceeds to a Hearing. The courts are not interested in the judgment calls of the Inspector or the merits of the case. Purely examining the legal points, such as have all the relevant planning policy and guidance have been taken into account and not misconstrued, or an issue being considered that shouldn't have been taken into account.
If the swampies were to win, the case is referred back to the Planning Inspectorate for them to determine again, and not make the same legal error. In my experience, in these types of cases, the newly appointed Inspector follows the previous Inspector but doesn't trip up on the point of law.
The only way a challenge can be made to the appeal decision is by Judicial Review and this will relate to the Inspector having errors in law. The merits of the case cannot be challenged. If the objectors issue a JR and win, this merely sends the appeal back to an Inspector to make a new decision without faltering on the legal point.
Balancedview, quite simply I don't work for ANGS's planners, and secondly I wasn't bothered about watching it se ond by second. I do have some work to do in between reading the messages over a coffee lol