Member Info for BashM

@GoldenGod - Substantive proof is required since we divulge in to tangents, that become pointless and just yields poor behaviour. Claims need to be evidenced as we can all create theories, but theories are just hairy fairy. Anyhow, I don't believe Carl is right and I definitely don't believe a large seller is at the helm. If they were it would a big hit sell rather than smaller rounded sells. Smaller sells point to a disgruntled retail investor. Price action is unfair, volume of buys outweighs the sells and yet we are down LOL. Madness

Coupon payment will come and isthisacult will be leaving us. And GoldenGod, I expect you to say and say they won't get the next payment, than the next, than the next LOL

My questions from this morning were answered - Thank you @GoldenGod. So he has confirmed we are not becoming insolvent, and he cannot prove QGP are selling. Therefore, I want to read no more on such matters unless anyone has solid evidence, or something to that effect is shared in the public domain. Latest accounts, fund raising and revenue mean we have money in the bank to execute our vision. Remember as of today, at least 68% of the share holding is with James and QGP. Means retail makes up 32%. So they are more than incentivised to drive up the sp. They win we win! I don't know many or any AIM shares with that split between board / institution / retail.

@Broke_holder - According to Gary's latest interview they have clients for V-Gold. So I would be eager to hear how you have deciphered they dont? As nothing says to the contrary in the public domain

@GoldenGod - Posting images from telegram does not answer the strong claims you have made. Please kindly back up the claims you made without referring to a website being down and a domain expiring LOL. I mean if thats all you have against this share there are non-issues. :)

More avoidance Crawshaw. Sharing a website being updated and a domain expiring does not raise red flags for me. It doesn't make a share un-investable! Claims are being made the company is going insolvent, and their institutional funder is selling - without evidence. I believe these are more fundamental claims that need to be substantiated. Rather than avoiding the points I am making, why don't you agree there is no evidence for either, but you have small concerns about the QGP site and domain expiring. These are non-tangible concerns for me.

Because your part and parcel of the same clan. That support each other when something without substance is posted. The question is to all the negative folk on this board. Prove my points. If you believe VLRM are not becoming insolvent you therefore believe they have funds are are executing. Otherwise how are they afloat?

Amazing how the clowns begin to divert the commentary when challenged LOL.

Oh crawshaw too funny. Correcting my language but not answering the question. Typical avoidance tactics when challenged

It’s amusing - same old noise, no evidence to back up claims. Just repeated non-value add comments. You have no clue or idea of how the VGold token will operate as it’s not in the public domain. And you have a motive - your poor investment decision on gate token.

No you have not done any substantive due diligence. No point getting shirty when openly challenged. Your remarks across with others are cause for concern for some of those invested. So I am right in challenging prove we are becoming insolvent and prove QGP are selling - I repeat a website being down or domain expiring proves none of those two points. Also prove QGP are selling their 1.44%! Surely after all the buys this morning you would think they would be dumping big. Volume is thee to be had.

Oh look surprise surprise - they are ignoring the direct challenging questions and filling the board up with their usual no substance content. Prove that VLRM are going into solvency and prove QGP are selling the 1.44%!

Oh look the old useless, valueless remarks for the same audience. I will not answer any questions till you clowns answer my questions with substantive evidence!

Stop avoiding my direct question. Prove inspolvency is coming and prove they are selling that 1.44%. We don’t need theories we need evidence to back up your claims. If you can prove one or both I will sell my whole holding - that’s how confident I am that you can’t prove it

No prove we have had 176k sells every day for 20 days :)

Just generic comments with no substance from the lot of you. Prove insolvency is impending? Evidence! Prove James is making his £4m b back through the backdoor. Don’t just spout rubbish how about adding proof and substance to these claims! I don’t mean showing me an image of QGP site being down or a domain that’s expired. That does prove nothing!

@Broke_holder - you are just bitter about gate token. Who told you to invest in that. Nick barely kept the GSX afloat and we all know what happened to that. Times have evolved and so has VLRM. We now have a mechnism to give us $16m revenue annualised, minimum. Excluding the bluebird deal - YES THEY CONFIRMED RECENTLY THAT $10bn DEAL IS STILL IN PLAY AND VLRM ARE IN THE TENT. Rome was not built in a day. Nonetheless, we have since the deal had news almost every week, and each RNS is a piece of the puzzle your small brains cannot put together. Too busy looking and domains and websites being down LOL

You lot love talking about QGP and dark arts. No clue how private funding works - The deal was completed on 22nd Jan. QGP had the whole of Feb and Mar to sell that 1.44%. That would have hammered the shareprice. Let me tell you a secret they are not selling like you keep banging on about. They see the bigger picture! Bitcoin didn't go to £90k in one day, there were up and down cycles. We won't win everyday but we certainly will win! - WE ARE A REVENUE GENERATING ENTITITY, with Q4 of 25/26 expected to generate £5m revenue! :)

The clowns also forget to mention that the whole market is in the dumps due to global factors, and price action is not just related to VLRM. The share price downward trend is down to very little selling volume, we have 490m shares in issue, today we traded 227k. What does that tell you! Let me educate you, that's retail traders like you sad folk. The big holders are guess what - still holding! They were holding when the DMC fell through and they are holding now. Take you heads out of the website not working and trying using the little brain power you evidently struggle to pull together before spouting nonesense on this board.

Let me ask a very simple question of you so called clever folk. James Bannon owned 33% of the company prior to this deal and circa 18% now. How and why would he want to run this company to the ground? What would be his motive?? - Before you begin spouting warrants, he had an substantial holding even before he became chairman. He was part of parcel of QGP deal. He is the single largest shareholder of VLRM aside from QGP, so why would he want a botched deal. Clearly James is not here to make money like the rest of us. He just wants to burn the £4m he invested in VLRM. LOL