Member Info for BashM

@Peoplepower1 - I will send an email tonight. As individuals like Tom W cannot be making such claims and writing articles which are clearly untrue. Putting 2 and 2 together to make 5 is not acceptable.

@Broke_holder - Lets be very clear please. Tom W does not always state factual information and has legal action presiding against him for making claims of such nature about other publicly listed entities. Secondly, can I once again be very clear - PROVE that all the claims are true and the funds used to underpin the $200m MTN for VLRM are from ponzi scheme? Also PROVE Stephen Fathers was part and parcel of Geluk Capital and he was implicated by the SEC action? IF you cannot these claims are falsified and you are scaring investors with a false and dangerous narrative.

@takecare - you first prove to me that Stephen fathers of VLRm is the same Stephen Fathers of Norwood Capital? Once you have done that I will address other points

@GoldenGod - I love it, like a true reporter he puts up the headlines rather than the full commentary. Swaying the picture its painting LOL

Lets be clear its a lot of hot air, without strong evidence of wrong doing by the individual holding 243m shares in VLRM. Tom W and @Broke_holder seem to believe its interesting. However, I have done my review and honestly no red flags for me. I mean the person impacted by SEC action is not the same person that holders the shares in VLRM. Plus the value of what was in-effect fraudulent behaviour by Geluk Capital, was small and only related to Douglas Fathers - Nothing to do with Stephen, that's what the official SEC filing says LOL. @Gaviscon they were getting upbeat about suspension and removal of VLRM from trading on Aquis

What concerns me even more GG for someone who isn't invested, isn't trading spends so much time on here letting of hot air LOL. Additionally, nearly always wrong and fearmongering. I mean that's very very concerning. Recommend you go see a shrink :). Private appointments are available and I will give you £20 towards the first one.

Well GoldenGod thank you for correcting me LOL - Even better you said they are going insolvent. Now they have paid $100k to the subscriber and £90k for the cancellation of 2m warrants. Definitely not a sign of a company going bankrupt LOL. Oh did I forget to mention - THE COMPANY HAS NO DEBT LOL

Lets correct you again @GoldenGod - Oh I am really enjoying this now LOL! If you read the RNS, than you will come to understand VLRM don't actually physically transfer $100k. That comes out of the first revenue payment to VLRM. No payment no $100k LOL. On your bike :)

I ain't your chum. LOL. You cannot prove it doesn't exist. I can prove it exists as there is REGULATED NEWS issued to the public domain it exists and been given to VLRM LOL. Now prove it otherwise, without hot air please

@GoldenGod - I honestly believe you think with your backside. In the $450k case of Geluk Capital, Douglas Fathers NOT STEPHEN, took $450k US money with essentially fraudlent information. Here QGP have provided VLRM with $200m, they taken NOWT lol.

I rightly demand substantive proof. As you cannot make a statemen that Stephen Fathers (assuming he is the same person holding 243m shares in VLRM), was in any way, shape or form involved in Geluck Capital. You cannot also prove how we are involved in Ponzi scheme for the $200m. You cannot prove that the $200m is from fraudulent money. Jumping up and down without substance LOL

Throughout the Relevant Period, GCM and Fathers offered the Geluk Fund to

numerous prospective investors, ultimately raising approximately $450,000 from U.S.-based

investors. GCM and Fathers provided prospective investors with a number of offering and

marketing documents, including a Confidential Explanatory Memorandum (“CEM”), Fund Fact

Sheets, and an Investor Presentation (together, the “Offering Documents”). Fathers, through GCM,

drafted and disseminated the Offering Documents to prospective investors

Now we are talking about $450k vs $200m - I mean we have already made that amount from revenue LOL. Ponzi scheme of $450k funds $200m - without any direct proof the person is the same person. And Douglas and Stephen are two different individuals LOL

Furthermore, in the Geluk Capital case, if you had read it they were using third party money and claiming their returns in essence. How is that anything to do with the structure of the deal with VLRM. Here they have given VLRM $200m MTN and are providing an AIO for $1bn. There is no investor or ponzi scheme here. Do you people read this stuff before you post?

Right spent some time reading through and lets be careful about jumping to conclusions and making claims that are unsubstantiated and unproven:

1. Firstly - 'Douglas Gerald Fathers (“Fathers”), 57 years old, is a resident of Fort Lee, New

Jersey. Fathers controlled GCM as the founder, president, and a director, and had sole discretion

over making investment decisions on behalf of GCM and the Geluk Fund. He was formerly a

registered representative and was last associated with a broker-dealer in 2002. - This is Douglas and NOT STEPHEN FATHERS. Douglas not Stephen had SOLE DISCRETION on making investment decisions.

2. Secondly, there is no direct link to prove the Stephen Fathers that holds 243m shares is the same person that was executive director at Nordwood Capital.

3. Thirdly, what are you trying to suggest the $200m MTN are from fraudlent money. Wait solicitors when buying a property have to do due diligence on source of money - for a $200m deal it is no different.

4. Lastly, there is no direct link to prove the $200m is from funds as part of a ponzi scheme.

Unless you can prove QGP Stephen Fathers and Norwood Capital Stephen Fathers are the same persons. And that Stephen used the funds from a Ponzi scheme, there is no point iterating these points. As its hairy fairy THEORY! :)

Fella - share them!

Can one of you share the proof you have found linking the same Stephen Farthers to this Ponzi scheme please? - Evidence not hot air thanks!

You are a broken record lol. Godaddy.com LOL. Let me change that for you go away.com lol

Oh the comedy never ends lol

Sadly the circus clowns are in town. Ruining insightful debate. Let them get on their caravan and than we will continue to discuss vlrm

See what I mean about non value add posts lol