Member Info for BashM

You are talking like we have had an exodus of sellers, and Gary did mention we had legacy warrant holders who would exercise the opportunity to cash in their gains

That drop has been caused by less than 5% of the company being traded hardly a red flag lol

You Miss the fact diluted for $269.5m - don’t tell half a story it’s not factual we are diluted without anything to show for it. We have something to show for it

You live in the past lol. I focus on the future! Bloody glad didn’t go through, QGP is much more lucrative deal and it offers more for 50% of VLRM. Leave you to finding out why DMC didn’t happen and QGP did lol

It also goes to show the market believes aside from the deal VLRM has value to offer hence the market cap of £35m. I mean pointless flagging reds, if it doesn’t impact the sp lol

I also think to remind you I don’t get why you raising red flags. Since the deal our market cap has not reflected the magnitude of the deal. If you don’t believe the $200m deal who cares as that’s not been priced on. So shareholders are not technically at a loss. When it re-rates than if it’s not believable it’s a red flag.

Let’s review today, you said Takecare made a factual statement I corrected you. Than you went on about DMC being a binding deal, I corrected you there. You than said RNS cannot be trusted. Well frankly if you don’t believe in RNS information you shouldn’t be investing, full stop LOL. Anyhow I proved the statement around the DMC deal and £19m is fundamentally different to QGP. As the RNS history shows DMC deal didn’t go through QGP did. They have 243m shares for $200m and across 5 years agreeed $79.5m interest payments.

I just keep proving you wrong it’s fun! So did you look into brining HoT, or do you just stick your head in the sand when I correct you. The deal was not binding FYI. The high level terms were. Had the deal been a success we would have been diluted and we were not. All of this was evidenced in the RNS.

Crawshaw you are embarrassing yourself now. RNS can be used as proof, it’s regulated. Otherwise why believe the results Apple, Google and the like release. Anyhow VLRM were transparent that they had a deal which fell through. HoT were binding not the final deal, go research what binding HoT are

No I don’t know why you used that reference in that context, when you clearly knew that the deal was terminated

Be nice for you to apologise on using a DMC reference when you knew it wasn’t accurate, rather than making another pointless statement

Check again - Trip to specsavers may help you to see the colour blue LOL

@Crawshaw - Now you are really sounding like TRIPE. We did indeed have an RNS to say £19m from DMC on deal completion. The deal didn't complete and VLRM issued an RNS to that effect to say no £19m no dilution - FACT.

VLRM do RNS says the QGP deal is complete - that's the difference!

Investors are not selling traders are - Look at the volume since we came out of suspension, aside from warrants being exercised, show me for the 500m shares in issue how many shares have sold. Let me tell you something its lower than 5% even :)

Oh look at the sad bum chums all talking to each other LOL. Investors ain't selling, not matter how much TRIPE you post LOL :). I see a nice blue day again today - FACT.

WSBN investors that didn't sell yesterday are at further loss today - FACT

Oh I love being right LOL

You clown the accounts are not released as yet, and will be in June 2026! Thats a FACT for your FACT. However, let me give you a rocket, I have an RNS proving that we have $279.5m as part of the QGP deal - what do you have - let me answer that for you DIDDLY SQUAT :)

You have not answered. Maybe answered with TRIPE but answer the questions directly. And whats with the emoji. Prove me with factual evidence not news articles with fairy stories VLRM has not entered into a $279.5m deal - FACTS not STORIES :) - Please don't bang on about the website. If you invest because of a website, god help your poor soul.

I did warn investors here repeatedly about RP and his antics. I even told some to sell yesterday and buy VLRM. Well if they and listened gosh would they have been better off. Anyhow wish you all the best

No you have not answered it - Are you invested yes or no? If yes, than why not sell? you think its a poor investment decision clearly!

If your not invested why are you here? - we don't need your advice.

Oh BTW 500m even for a tech company is NOT EXCESSIVE. :). Especially for one that has $279.5m.

I leave you now to correct anything I have written. As its all factually correct :)

One example as you ask so nicely - The BoD have recently removed 7.5m warrants to prevent SH dilution, having diluted the share massively and repeatably in the past few years.

Before QGP entered, the company had ~247m shares in issue. QGP were then issued 243m shares in exchange for $279.5m, effectively acquiring around half of the company. That is the primary driver behind the significant increase toward ~500m shares . This context is completely omitted - TRIPE!

Calling 500m shares “highly unusual” is simply incorrect. Many mining and exploration companies on AIM run into the billions of shares over multi‑year development cycles. Suggesting that 500m is somehow extreme is TRIPE!

While 7.5m represents a small percentage of total shares, it is not inconsequential because: Liquidity is extremely low.A large proportion of shares sit with “sticky hands” like me :). Had the warrants been exercised, they would have been churned into the market, putting downward pressure on the share price.

In a low‑liquidity environment, 7.5m additional shares hitting the market matters — no question. So TRIPE AGAIN.

Also all of this fails to acknowledge the point I originally made - again TRIP SPIN - That they paid £100k to remove these warrants, had they no money or no revenue why and how would they pay this.