Member Info for Bamps21

Hi zelos
I thought Hydro was trying to get a signal on his phone halfway up that cliff :))

I have kept an eye on what goes on here, I have to say I’m shocked at the amount of ramping on here and concerned a lot here will experience a fall at some point and I know some of my friends are here.
Some of you think I am against WSBN that’s certainly not the case.
I want to give you some unbiased facts from what I can see.
Quotes I have seen that Redsetter is similar to Havieron what is this:-
The magnetic anomalies are not the same Havieron is deep.
There is no gravity survey like Havieron to base any similarities on.
The pathfinder minerals shown are not the same as Havieron.
The only similarity I can see is the pyhritite alteration which is where the magnetic signature comes from.

I’m looking at
https://wishbonegold.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WSBN_RNS_Red_Setter_High_Resolution_Magnetic_Survey_Results_10jq210218.pdf
Page 3
This shows the area of the aerial survey highlighting in red the magnetic targets.
On the right it shows 2 sections , a long section marked 1 and a cross section 2.
Along section 2 there are 3 drill holes shown in blue.

Page 4
On this page you can see the pathfinder minerals.
Below this are diagrams
Top left is a plan view showing the 1500m strike target and in the centre of it the target, below this plan is a long section showing this target.
This target is situated within the 400m strike length but is not 400m wide, there’s nothing else of note within the 1500 strike length.
Moving to the right there is another section showing the drill holes, it’s a bit deceiving the one on the right is behind and away from the target (see plan).
On this section are shown the 3 drills, in green are shown the copper values.
Looking above this is the drill results
EPT2176 is the one that’s away from the target and it has the highest copper reading and not economical amounts , there’s only a trace of gold not economical, the other minerals are just pathfinders .
The drills haven’t tested the centre there may be gold there but it’s not that far from those drills so looks doubtful.
Moving on down the page to section 2 it shows where they intend to drill through the centre, this drill is only 293m long the centre target is only 50m in diameter.
Conclusion
Redsetter is a spherical target 50-100m it’s not deep it’s a copper play if the grades are economical.
Being spherical more waste must be factored into the equation when processing.

Please do your own research and don’t listen to rampers they will lose you money

The character assassination of Hydro today was most uncalled for.
I’ve met him and we had a nice meal at Tigs Stag on the River meet up, together with JerryS, IPad, Claireabella , he is not how he has been portrayed today.
If you remember this time last year GDXJ had got their free float figures incorrect, it was Hydro that phoned them and they had to go round scurrying around for more shares making the share price rise.
He is definitely an asset here

https://greatlandgold.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/20210909-GGP-Announcement-Havieron-Exploration-Update-jorc-1.pdf
Page 17

“Core recovery is systematically recorded from the commencement of coring to end of hole, by reconciling against driller’s depth blocks in each core tray with data recorded in the database. Drillers depth blocks provided the depth, interval of core recovered, and interval of core drilled.
Core recoveries were typically 100%, with isolated zones of lower recovery.
Cover sequence drilling by the mud-rotary drilling did not yield recoverable samples.“

It’s the length of drills that cause issues, 2,000m is most drillers maximum pulling cores out.

Hi Ben
I think they will stick at 75% if they take it.
At 75% they can class the whole asset on their books but don’t hold me to that I don’t know how that works.
Are you still busy?

I like this about Tabletop 1
There is considerable size potential. Hence this anomaly is a quality exploration target. The depth of the sources of the responses may however be prohibitive, as a +1000 metre deep hole would be required to test this target.

Hi Peter
I hope you are well.
The mineralisation could be found in other ore types rather than sulphides.
Far more survey work and modelling is required before any drill targets will be identified.

Pascalle HEM Survey
New Resolution Geophysics (NRG) has completed 925 line kilometres of XciteTM HEM and AMAG survey at 100m spacing over the entirety of the Pascalle tenement. This survey gives the highest resolution geophysical dataset so far recorded over Pascalle.
EM surveys, such as that run by NRG, are designed to detect highly concentrated massive-sulphide bodies down to a depth of approximately 400m whereas AMAG surveys are designed to identify local magnetic anomalies, potentially associated with hydrothermal fluid flow activity. Preliminary processing of initial HEM survey results shows no evidence of massive sulphide, meaning that if sulphides are present there is not enough connectivity between the grains to create a conductive body. The survey has recorded 14 subtle anomalies that could be related to bedrock conductors but could also be explained by local near surface conductivity variations.
Where magnetic targets occur without associated massive-sulphide, as indicted by the absence of EM anomalies, there remains potential for low-sulphidation mineralisation such as quartz-Au stringer- breccia style or disseminated sulphides. Potential follow on work using a ground-based, gradient array induced polarisation (GAIP) electrical geophysical technique, (which has the ability to identify disseminated sulphide mineralisation, such as that associated with Telfer, Winu, and Calibre style gold- copper-silver type mineral systems), may be undertaken.
Final review of enhanced AMAG and EM channel imagery is required to clarify magnetic targets associated with low level amplitude EM anomalism. Structural interpretation of magnetic data will be used to define prospect scale targets to plan and mobilise GAIP surveys prior to drilling.

Pascalle project
https://www.provinceresources.com/pascallecoppergold
I don’t believe it has been drilled
Pascalle anomaly has a magnetic anomaly similar to Havieron but is split down the middle
Is it more of a strategic move, there is a map on PSL web site showing it splitting Newcrest land
https://patersonresources.com.au/projects/grace-project/

Hi Burleigh
I believe I am very fair to most people and give the benefit of the doubt. That poster is always negative so there comes a time when you have to put untruths in their place. He is bordering on the misleading rule 5c which is why Timeserved got wiped out.

Allonred
2029 H&P estimate is the bulk mining.
Do some research for heaven’s sake you’re making a right fool of yourself

Hi Allonred
Total unresearched nonsense .
Check out tabletop 1 and 2 anomalies.
Pascalle licence has 5 anomalies with Pascalle itself a similar size as Havieron magnetics.

Rule 5c
post misleading or false statements regarding the share price and performance. Such posts are deemed as market abuse, and may be reported to the appropriate authorities.

I hope posters take heed of this when they post about share dilution

Ggp are fully funded through the Newcrest loan.
Shaun intimated in April interview that the Full Feasibility Study will come quite quickly after the PFS. Possibility of March if that happens there’s no way they will spend $30m between the 2 studies.

Talk of share dilution is twaddle.
When they start taking sample loads out they won’t stop extracting ore, remember they’re going in to a high grade pocket to start with.
Sample loads might be 5,000t per day I say that cos 2m ton per year max decline capacity is about 5400t pd
That would give revenues of just over $1m per day
What the hell do we need a diluted share for?

That link should put doubters minds at ease.
Havieron inferred copper grades 0.31%.
I’ve always been working on .2%
Hydro’s recent post was working on 0.15%
I reckon copper values on that grade less recovery % would =$6.75bn to Ggp

Hi Freddie
Not really Paddy seems to think it was in the original agreement but I can’t find it.
Take a look at this briefing book it’s very informative,
Havieron will be recorded under Telfer province
https://www.newcrest.com/sites/default/files/2021-02/210211_Newcrest%20Resources%20and%20Reserves%20Statement.pdf

Hi Zoros
Where have you read that the FS is included in the joint venture agreement.
All I keep seeing is “upto” “prior”.
To gain 70% of Havieron they have to earn in upto the FS not including.
If I was in Newcrest shoes I would want the full 70% before providing the FS.
Would be happy to be proved wrong though

Hi Lenz
I would expect an AISC figure but it all depends which initial mining method they use.
Will another decline be planned in?
Will they stope, sub level cave, Board and Pillar or bulk cave.?
Transport issues?
How will they cope with the Dyke leave it in or take it out?
Without the initial mining plan anything else is immaterial

Hi the doors
Good question
My top 5 components in the PFS would be
1 Mining Plan
2 Mining Plan
3 Mining Plan
4 Mining Plan
5 Mining Plan

:)))

What where’s that then?
That was my first thoughts
https://greatlandgold.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GGP-Corporate-Presentation.pdf
Page 22

The pad is up near Lake Havieron direction and drilled South towards where the Dyke leaves the SE crescent at the south end on the right hand side.

The top intercept is 121m @9.3G/t giving a 1159gram metre
Now this is where you should look at included figures
As it has an intercept within it of
26.6 @ 34g/t over 900 gram metres.

The interesting thing is they tested this zone again with 133W1 which found similar grades.

It’s certainly the richest zone we have.
The first sub level caving operation will still be above this zone and maybe the second level as well