Member Info for Bamps21

I can’t see copper mining gaining any carbon credits, it takes far too much energy especially metallurgical coal to refine the product.
At the moment Havieron is using oil/ diesel and lots of it to keep it’s activities going.
This is likely to change in the longer term especially to solar power.

Telfer has a gas main to it’s plants to produce its gold dore and copper concentrate. It takes a lot of gas to produce the concentrate.
A lot of their machines in the plant are run on oil.
The trucks in the mine are all diesel.

The concentrate is exported to SE Asia countries where the concentrate is refined into copper cathodes. They use metallurgical coal mainly from Australia, this is a far cleaner coal than locally produced coal and is more expensive.

The new Labor government can’t do much at the moment about cutting coal exports without damaging global battery material supplies.

The big miners are taking the lead here, Rio and Fortesque esp the latter are powering ahead with green hydrogen plans, to power their mines and also processing plants.
Fortesque plan to supply Germany with 30% of its green hydrogen needs by 2030.

How are they doing this? By installing vast solar fields on their licences plus wind farms. The electricity produced gives them all the clean energy to run their mines. The excess electricity is used to produce green hydrogen, liquified and exported.
A completely new industry for the miners.
NCM have plans and have started with solar and wind.
What Australia needs now are plans to refine metals themselves.
All these plans should start to reduce the reliance on coal as hydrogen exports increase.

Ggp have a lot of land in windy deserts, you have to look beyond the mining influence on its valuation, the future could be as a hydrogen exporter.
It’s coming , green energy is a massive growth industry and will replace gas and oil eventually 2030-2050.

What can the new government do about their coal exports? is a huge question
https://amp.abc.net.au/article/100964414

That link is on vox market

Ggp have some great assets but where would be without Havieron.
Same as any other junior exploration company probably struggling for funds to get drilling.
It takes a lot of patience with some of these licences as Alistair Clayton said on his latest interview with Bottle Rocket.
https://youtu.be/nYSxHHbg0MY
Artemis have only a few holes in their Paterson project a bit of a come down from the enthusiasm of look alike cores to Havieron.
Realistically he says the Dyke/fault line is where they should have concentrated on.
What’s happening next? Well Wishbone investors are excited but what could they expect.
They are about to drill Redsetter/ Cottesloe and Wishbone 2.
From what I’ve seen from their published resources they are truly over excited.
Redsetter has 4 targets the main one Redsetter itself is shown in their Feb 21 presentation. 2 historical drills went down either side of the main target which is only about 100m max spherical shaped.
The bulletin board are expecting gold and copper, but those 2 drills show it being a copper target.
https://www.**********.co.uk/articles/wishbone-gold-soars-after-discovering-new-targets-at-patersons-range-project--bbae838/
I haven’t found any details/ information to confirm these sizes.
Wishbone 2 licence acquired in 2011 and Wishbone 4 in 2013.
W2 re acquired in 2016 after relinquishing 22 blocks on W4
No drilling to date
A W2 report by Terra search in 2017 has a plan and cross section of an ore body which confused me and then found it was another companies 12km to the West. That company said the results were disappointing in 2012.

Overall I am very comfortable with my holding in Ggp and the calibre of the team past and present,
Callum and Gervais set us up to be a very strong exploration company soon to be a developer under Shaun’s guidance.
I know Callum likes Rudall , so can’t wait for that to get drilled .
A bit more information would be helpful to us on some of the licences that have gone very quiet in the last 12 months or so.
Thor have provided some information for Panorama especially regarding the nickel target on the east of that licence.
Ernest Giles is still waiting for clearance prior to drilling, I know Shaun is keen to get going there.
Tasmania Ggp still looking to off load/ jv these 2 good assets

GLA Bamps

From Aug 2018 RNS

Highlights of Results from 3DIP Survey
· High quality IP data was collected allowing the production of excellent 3D models which highlight a large gold target, approximately 1,000 metres long, traversing east-west across the Firetower prospect, which is open to the east and up to depths of 400 metres;
· Significantly, the results illustrate the existing sub-surface gold mineralisation identified in drilling to date is spatially associated with the 3DIP chargeability anomaly;
· The results support the Company's view that cost effective 3DIP models can be used to track the mineralised system and assist with drill location planning at Firetower;
· The 3D model of the chargeability anomaly also highlights the potential plunge of mineralisation which is very important for focusing on areas within the broader mineralised system which may potentially host higher grade gold and copper mineralisation.

Next Steps
· Greatland is currently working on plans for a drill programme to test the large target identified by the results of the 3DIP survey;
· The Company is also reviewing options to deploy 3DIP geophysics across the broader prospective sequence at Firetower which has been identified over approximately 4km of strike.

Wonder what is happening with it?

Hi Strudel
Bitty is the way I would describe it, I think there were some vertical veins bit similar to Minyari.

I think with Eurasia the issue is with the Russian compliant system is different to the Jorc system and consultants have just done a CPR for the Jorc resource.
I did look ages ago at their exploration information and didn’t like what I saw as there wasn’t much to go on.
I’m only guessing here but it looks like a conflict of systems.
Glad I didn’t get involved.

I’ve looked at Brucejack a couple of weeks back, surprised at how many exploration drills have no significant assays.
1 intercepts was 28m @ 262g/t but had an included intercept within it of 1m @ 7,400g/t massively upping the average although rather exceptional.
I heard that NCM shareholders weren’t happy about the deal due to the many geological issues they were having there.
I’m sure NCM most know how to deal with these issues.
Only 5-600m deep and a lot of targets to explore.

Try to follow my imagination describing the January results in 3D:-
Imagine standing in the centre of the ovoid on top of the cover sequence in the year 2050.
We are approximately 1,000m below ground level, looking up the blue sky is just a small oval shape, it’s dark down here and hot with little light.
We are now vertically beneath the western edge of the Dyke , looking towards the east the Dyke has inclined some 200m away from us.
The sides of the ore body are coming inwards to meet the Dyke at our level, with little of the Dyke being seen below where we are.
Looking down we’re at the edge of a 400m shear cliff where the bulk mining has dropped passed the top of the Dyke leaving a huge void.

To the right there is another shear cliff this has been caused by the SE deeps sloping off to the South at these levels.
Turning around to face Northwestwards , imagine the northern corridor and pods are still there. They start about 50 m from us rising up in a huge mound stretching across the ovoid to about 100m high. From there they rise up again to about 300m below the underside of the cover level with the northern pod about halfway up on the left as a great blob of sulphides holding about a 1m oz.
Now looking up to the north to the left of the Dyke on the sides of the country rock you can see where the latest drills came through all around 100m down from the top of the ore body through the sides
We have Had 150 to the left and then 149. Underneath the slope of the Dyke you can see HAD61 and then lower down to the right 86W4. On the plan these last 2 look to enter from the other side of the Dyke on the east side but that’s an illusion due to the slope of the Dyke but enter underneath on the west side.
All these drills are heading towards us then down into the SE Deeps , Had 149 and 149W2 go out of the ore body at this level over 100m testing the ground for the mining fronts.
HAD 86 W4 goes through the SE Deeps and out of the ore body over 200m outside the ore body but 800m below where we are standing.
This zone we standing in was all crackle breccia a weak grade zone picked up during HAD2 and Had4 days between the Dyke and Northern Corridor and this wraps around the northern corridor to the sides and top. It’s this area where we are standing that these drills have been infilling on their way down to the SE crescent to infill that zone lower down.
A few of the other drills announced have been infilling zones within the Northern corridor.
Where we are standing is the area that will increase the inferred tonnage in the MRE2.
The N corridor - the small section that was included in the first MRE will change from inferred to indicated the rest will go to inferred.”

I’m expecting a few more infill drills in the March results and that will be the cut off period.

Hang on ! How do I get out?
:))

From the Annual report to June 21
Review of key developments by project,
Ernest Giles project
During the period, Greatland carried out solid geology interpretation and litho-geochemical interpretation of the 2017 and 2019 drilling, with lithogeochemistry used to identify significant alteration and pathfinder patterns at the Meadows target area. The Company was also involved in ongoing Native Title land access agreement negotiations.
A comprehensive review of all data for the Ernest Giles project was carried out later in the year. The Board decided that Greatland should increase its land holdings in the region and applied for two additional exploration licences, E38/3612 Mount Smith and E38/3613 Welstead contiguous to the current live licences of Peterswald and Calanchini.
Panorama project (Western Australia), 100% owned
The Panorama project
During the period Greatland continued field exploration at Panorama with a 362 line km heliborne electromagnetic and magnetic survey over part of the tenements. Processing and interpretation of data is currently underway.
Bromus project (Western Australia), 100% owned
The Bromus project
During the period, Greatland undertook a desktop prospectivity review aimed at collating work done which resulted in resampling historic RC chip, soil sampling, and Minalyze analysis of historic diamond drill core.
Firetower project (Tasmania), 100% owned
The Firetower project
During the year the Company completed a review of the Firetower Project exploration data, identifying structures potentially controlling the gold mineralisation, and potential down plunge positions that warrant follow up drilling.
Warrentinna project (Tasmania), 100% owned
The Warrentinna
During the period Greatland undertook a review of the Warrentinna Project exploration data and rehabilitation of old drill pads.

I will try one more time after seeing your last I can see you still haven’t grasped the situation and Colonel Duck has joined in.
You’ve quoted 3 drills that are not in your 0-800m theme of these drills are below it.
In the PFS it states 54mt
In Ggp MRE 78mt
Where have you quoted 680mt from?
It’s not in these estimates so if it’s not in there it can’t be missing, this is for future resource estimates.
Go to page 8 and look at the plan.
On this plan it shows a black outline this is where the resource estimates are coming from

https://greatlandgold.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/20210429-GGP-Announcement-Havieron-Exploration-Update.pdf
The Ggp estimate is bigger because it contains a portion of the Eastern breccia which is lower than your 0-800m so must be deducted from the total.

One of my favourite drills is Had 90 there are numerous intercepts running through the Northern pod and breccia all of these are in the bulk mining and not in the MRE.

In the last results we had drills 93 and 152 both very long targeting the Eastern breccia way below your 0-800m and nowhere near the MRE resource.
These ran right through the centre on its way down within the 0-800m depth but not in the MRE 0-800m .

That’s all on this subject for me

Chase
I’m finding your question rude and arrogant.
I will share my research and knowledge with anyone but to be honest not this time do your own research.
I know the answer to have a dozen drill numbers without having to look.
Perhaps you should start looking.
The best drill we have went through this area but you wouldn’t know that would you

Chase I explained to you twice in my posts and you have not taken any notice of them, you have completely got the wrong end of the stick.
We have 2 sections of mine within your 0-800m depth.
The 78mt is in the SE crescent and is only a small proportion of that crescent.
The 600m you keep referring to is the future bulk caving to the NW of the crescent.
The infill drilling for the SE crescent was nearly complete by the Dec21 MRE
The infill drilling for the rest including the Northern breccia and Northern pod is still happening and maybe included in the next MRE.
This is where most of your 600mt is situated.
You can’t expect a bulk cave mining plan to be issued at that depth it needs to be around the 1300 depth

Chase
That was a very strong negative post.
That made you look like a complete novice.
I know where there is a more to come in the 0-800m but I’m certainly not going to do your work for you.
You have ignored all my explanations it looks like you are (is that ok Norf) out to deceive people.

CJ do not reply to this keep out

I have to say in the last 12 months I have met quite a few posters on here and some that are just readers.
They are such a great bunch of people, I’ve never been in a share with my such friendship to others.

Negative posting is not a trait I like especially criticising other peoples spelling.
My old fingers can’t type as fast as my brain works and the 2 big cracks in my screen are causing me more issues with my spelling. I dropped it in London last week meeting JerryS :((

As for being accused of being a paid ramper, I don’t ramp I bamp.
I’m really annoyed though cos there’s no payments gone in my account :))
I’ve made a great profit on ITM the shorters are sending it up and down like a yo yo.

About 60% of my portfolio is in here and quite happy with the situation, I mean where else do I put it, nothing stable at the moment.

I’m holding for the Ggp story to unfold I’m not looking at the day to day sp.
There’s big money here to those that can wait.

I’m looking forward to spending my kids inheritance!

That’s a sly dig at me has Norf come back

Hi Carefree
Two long posts and not articulate at all.
Your free to express your opinions but I would expect everyone on here has felt very uncomfortable feeling your having a go at them.
A lot of posters come on here complaining about rampers without naming them. You should name them to let them defend themselves.
Accusing everyone but not naming anyone is a disingenuous thing to do.
I couldn’t careless if you think I’m one, I share my research and tell it as I see it.
If you’ve been from 2019 you will know that my figures/calculations have been growing continually, I don’t see where you can find repetitious figures.

On the Board buying shares if you had taken the time to go and see Shaun and asked the question you would have the same answer we all heard.
I’m not going to say what he said I will leave you to do your own research and not piggy back off others

Hi Chase
I can see you are confused.
At the time of the PFS not enough of the ore body had enough information to formulate a mining plan.
Block cave mining occurs at the base of the ore, there is not enough knowledge to say what depth or size the infrastructure will be positioned.
The Eastern breccia has added even more uncertainty of the depth or size.

Forget about the bulk block caving for now, it may or may not be featured in the forthcoming FS.

In the PFS mining plan a 2m ton pa plan was formulated from information upto 6 months previous. The sulphides were the main object with some adjoining breccia that would be retrieved in the plan as well as a few tonnage from the northern breccia.
The Ggp MRE is based on the same principles as the last plan, but further information has increased the size of the sulphides.
Most of this increase has been within the size of the surrounding breccia.
There are also increases to the depth and lengths of the sulphides increasing the tonnage and formulation of a 3mt pa mining plan.
There are still a lot of the breccia surrounding the sulphides not in the plan, this I believe is because of the shape of the Dyke sloping down to the east decreasing the amount of tonnage available lower down.
When you say 680m I believe the whole ore body is approaching 1b ton and growing.
The block caving plan might take a few more years to formulate if drilling from lower down within the decline is needed
I’m sorry you think I’m incorrect, if you still can’t get what is happening please ask the company

Hi Chase
The 78m ton is still a tiny proportion of the SE crescent mainly the sulphides there’s still a lot of breccia around the sulphides .
The rest is where the bulk mining comes in.

It’s very hard to separate the Eastern Breccia from the main ovoid
Newcrest published an interesting plan slice at the 1000m of ore depth:-
https://www.newcrest.com/sites/default/files/2022-04/220428_Newcrest%20Mar%202022%20Quarterly%20Report%20-%20Exploration_2.pdf
Page 14
The extent of the breccia has increased at this level which is shown as a dotted yellow line 500m wide compared to 350m higher up.
At this level the EB starts to widen out for another 400m depth.
On that plan the northern corridor high grade (shown in pink) has moved NE towards the EB, this area is all outside the sulphide ring and the 350m width.
On the bottom right you can see the 104 intercept with pink to the north and a white area below it.
This white area I’m expecting to fill in as it hasn’t been drilled yet, well not at this level.
300-400m below this level is drill 90 under this white zone and ends a lot further out, this could lengthen my lower ovoid assumption to 1200m.
There’s still a lot to come from the EB.
Really looking forward to a 1300-1400m slice plan .
Growing all the time but the depth element will stop at these levels until they can get drilling rigs down below.
I would expect to see designated drilling tunnels at some point but a lot deeper than where we are now

Metallurgical recovery assumptions are based on detailed analysis and laboratory flotation and leach test work completed on 38 variability samples during the Havieron Concept Study (2020) and Stage 1 PFS (2021) with good spatial coverage of the South East Crescent Zone. Of the 38 samples, 8 samples are located in the Breccia Zones and 30 samples are located in the South East Crescent Zone, of which 21 samples are located within the Stage 1 PFS South East Crescent Zone Indicated Mineral Resources. Based on these samples metallurgical recoveries for gold are anticipated to average approximately 88% and recoveries of copper are expected to average approximately 84% throughout the life of the project.

Those are terrific recovery rates when they are for the life of the mine.
That is for the SLOS operation not the bulk mining I would expect those to be a lot lower.
The SLOS operation carries through till 2034 at the moment as not all the SE Deeps are in these figures