RE: copper from last rns26 May 2021 14:04
@Daniel No we have no real information on CAPEX to build the mine, geology which drives OPEX and whether it would be open cast or underground. What we do know is that when decision was taken to suspend Copper exploration it was shelved as 'uneconomic' back when copper was circa $6,500/t.
Let's suppose:
Copper is now circa $10k/t which is an entirely different circumstance given the JORC 'indicates' 19,000t of contained copper. If we assume when project was shelved that cost were an astronomic $123.5m or $6,500/t to build (CAPEX) and run (OPEX) to extract the 19kt of metal that would generate FCF of $3.500/t x 19kt = $66.5m or £48m.
I've no idea where the reality actually is but the REAL issue is how would an £8m MCap Junior Explorer finance this given it will take several years to plan, permit, design, build and commission before it generates any revenue?
What I do know is that GWMO are now actively looking to restart copper exploration with a view to expanding the current JORC resource estimates as they originally did some drilling next to the drilling that underpinned the existing 4.3Mt JORC resource but it was not of sufficient confidence levels to extend the resource ... further 'infill' drilling may resolve that. IF the JORC resource can be grown 2x to 3x existing size then the maths gets a lot easier very quickly as the CAPEX becomes a much smaller proportion of the potential future revenue so a lot less risky for us and any JV partner.
Needless to say IF GWMO can increase the copper JORC this is transformational in its own right especially as we know this target was M2 and to the best of my knowledge there were 8x Copper targets identified in the Huntoon Valley which implies a central mine camp and processing plant may be possible being fed from one or more satellite ore bodies. Let's just not get ahead of ourselves though !
AIMHO & ATB APR