Member Info for Amtech

In the full year results exploration and evaluation costs are stated as been $48m so where the $100m comes from I don�t know. So it�s a $48m intangible assets in the books but just because it�s valued on the books at that doesn�t mean it is that value. Even if they sold the licence it doesn�t mean they�d recover the $48m evaluation costs. Even so to create a market cap out of exploration costs and a perceived value of that data is not how it works. Every oil company going would do a few tests on a licence area, say there�s a chance of oil in that trap, multiply exploration by 12 then just sell it on.

�more� !!!!!!!!

$600m for the data, wt! Someone�s been drinking to many Martinis me thinks.

........a spiders web and you�re caught in the middle..........

It�s one of those mysteries I try not to worry myself with.

�eagles back eyes� what the devil did I write there? Must of mixed up my eagles and owls

Yeah I�ll be waiting for a bit yet Apple. With Italy dragging the markets down and MKA�s sp smashing through the 50day sma, Macd & signal line crossed to the dark side with a gap opening up between them. It�s the 14 day RSI that caught my eye though below the 25 mark. I shall get my eagles back eyes on.

.....time for another trade yet?

There�s only one reason to exercise warrants and that�s �money�, the problem with most PI�s is they would rather have two birds in a bush incase they breed rather than one in their hand.

Exactly, why exercise now if they ain�t going to flip them!

What the!

Are you part of the organised boiler room pump gang?

Another top ten ramper, morning ironic

If this was all so good with 28b barrels upside (OIP) then why didn�t the others that have had access to the data room sort a deal out? They�ve had plenty of time.

Hey there�s 28b barrels down there why should there be any negativity. The fact that Mac doesn�t believe it leads me to think someone�s got it wrong and 28b barrels will be staying down there! Or was it 17b barrels?

It gets my goat when posters have no morals when telling others they�re in a good place to sling �15k on a spin on the wheel when the odds are stacked against them of the chances of the ball landing on green. They play the promises of riches to others for their own gain. They need calling out and I will continue to do so as and when needed. We can all be a little optimistic and get excited at the prospect of winning big and it�s a great feeling if it happens. If that�s your risk tolerance and it comes off great well done for having steel ones. But knowingly to post something whether written by yourself or not with the aim to deceive the gullible is shameful.

Be careful JonnyB, he�ll accuse you of playing games bending the truth like that!

There is no fishing to be done, all can see you tried to mislead. Hence why you�re trying to flip it to me playing games!

Regardless, you posted to mislead!!! That�s why people should take your 11k postings a year with a truckload of salt.

So it was a misleading article headline designed to grab this boards attention just like it was in 2014! They knew that then and you knew that now so why post it?