Member Info for Amers

Roger,

You frequently post content that appears misleading or unconstructive. I’ve previously asked you to share your holdings for the sake of transparency, and you've failed to do so. This raises doubts about your credibility as a genuine investor and suggests your intentions may not align with those of long-term holders.

If you were truly invested here, it’s unlikely you’d be consistently so negative. I kindly ask that you refrain from further disruptive commentary.

To fellow holders: please consider not engaging with posts that seem deliberately provocative. Responding only adds unnecessary attention and distraction.

Let’s stay focused on the bigger picture.

To GDR Holders Who Are Undecided on Their Vote:

I'd like to address those who are still uncertain about which way to vote.

Roger, with respect, your shifting stance on this matter has caused confusion—one day you're fully supportive of a "Yes" vote, and the next you’re voting "No." While you're certainly entitled to change your mind, frequent reversals can undermine confidence in your position.

As several others and I have pointed out, voting "Yes" does not require anyone to invest additional funds at this stage. It simply offers the company and fellow investors some much-needed breathing room.

If you are a genuine investor, I encourage you to share your holdings to help bring more transparency to the discussion.

Let’s remain mature and focused. Voting "Yes" gives the company a chance to move forward—it’s not about emotion or frustration, but about making a strategic decision for potential recovery.

Jimi Time is not on their side....currently money is more important, then FDA approval

Could you please raise the following points with the Board of Directors and/or Gino at your earliest convenience:

1. There is a significant concern among shareholders regarding the Board's communication practices. Can the Board clarify why communication has been inconsistent or lacking?

The Board recognises the importance of consistent, transparent engagement with their investors and stakeholders. Public communication adheres to regulatory requirements, commercial sensitivities, and the need to ensure announcements are accurate, and appropriately timed. The Company can only make announcements when there is news to share – when it is meaningful and appropriate to do so. Conversely, a period of no communication does not equate to inactivity and bad news.

2. What is the current status of the FDA application? An update on the progress and timeline would be appreciated.

There is no further update from what has already been publicly stated.

3. Why have no members of the Board purchased shares in the company to date?

Directors have purchased >£170k since Jun-24 and participate in share purchases when it is permitted to do so under strict regulatory adherence.

4. Do any Board members plan to purchase shares in the near future?

I am unable to comment on any future share purchases and the Company are required to announce all director dealings.

5. Given the current circumstances, would the Board be willing to consider a temporary 30% reduction in remuneration?

The cost of the Board has significantly reduced from the amount reported in FY24, during a period in which the Company demonstrated product-market fit, by doubling total income in markets that they are at the forefront of creating. The operational costs have shifted from pre-commercial to commercial activities and for a publicly listed business operating internationally in a highly regulated medical device and in vitro diagnostic sector, they are low and continue to be managed tightly, with all options for minimising cash expenditure continuously reviewed.

I am finding it increasingly difficult to convince shareholders to vote in favor of the upcoming resolution. I have secured approximately 4 million shares and, at this stage, I am not inclined to vote "yes" without more clarity and reassurance.

I would appreciate a direct response from a member of the Board, or alternatively, a formal RNS addressing the above points on behalf of the shareholders I represent.

Thank you,

You may vote Yes, No, or Abstain.

Before you decide to vote No, consider your reasoning carefully. Doing so may inadvertently support the Board of Directors (BOD) in carrying out their plans without proper checks. If they have unfavorable intentions, a No vote gives them free rein to act as they wish.

At this stage, you are not being asked to contribute any additional funds. You are simply being asked to vote in support of a potentially better future for all stakeholders. If fundraising becomes necessary in the future, you will still have the option to participate or decline.

Voting No may deny fellow shareholders their last chance to recover a meaningful portion of their investment or see any returns. Emotional decisions—especially those driven by frustration—can be detrimental in the context of investing.

A Yes vote could benefit not only your fellow investors but also thousands of individuals who rely on this initiative, including many who are unwell and in need of support.

Rud20 Happens with age!!!

EC had enough with your utter nonsense. Back in the green coffin.

I have email Walbrrok with below and will let you all know, in case I get reply...not holding much hope.

Subject: Request for Clarification from the Board of Directors

Hi Anna,

Could you please raise the following points with the Board of Directors and/or Gino at your earliest convenience:

There is a significant concern among shareholders regarding the Board's communication practices. Can the Board clarify why communication has been inconsistent or lacking?

What is the current status of the FDA application? An update on the progress and timeline would be appreciated.

Why have no members of the Board purchased shares in the company to date?

Do any Board members plan to purchase shares in the near future?

Given the current circumstances, would the Board be willing to consider a temporary 30% reduction in remuneration?

I am finding it increasingly difficult to convince shareholders to vote in favour of the upcoming resolution. I have secured approximately 4 million shares and, at this stage, I am not inclined to vote "yes" without more clarity and reassurance.

I would appreciate a direct response from a member of the Board, or alternatively, a formal RNS addressing the above points on behalf of the shareholders I am trying to convince to vote yes.

Thank you,

Roger that post is from a TROLL..ignore it

Gloria you have no holding and not sure why you bother/wasting your time by posting here. Someone did ask you to post your hold, and you have not responded.

Please remember, if we are unable to raise the required funds, there are two potential outcomes:

The company could enter administration, in which case shareholders are unlikely to receive any return.

If the company is taken private and shareholders choose to retain their shares, those shares will be transferred to a standard dealing account. The new private entity will not be required to provide regular progress updates or financial reporting.

For these reasons, it is strongly recommended to vote in favour of the proposal.

Someone ask Gloria to post her holding, still no reply. Why don't you post your honest holding here. What matters is not how large holding you have, but all Yes Votes counts.

Baznick Holly Molly there are some investors here with more brain, then just the GOLD FISH. Thanks for supporting everyone.

I have emailed the below to Walbrook.

Subject: Shareholder Feedback and Request for Additional Resolution

Hi Anna,

I hope you're well.

Several of us shareholders have been actively discussing the upcoming vote on the LSE Bulletin Board. I've been encouraging fellow holders to vote in favor, but a recurring concern keeps coming up in the conversation.

Many are saying they would be more inclined to support the resolutions if the Board of Directors includes a fourth resolution—specifically, a commitment that the Board will take a 30% pay cut until the company becomes self-funding.

Could you please pass this feedback along to the Board, including Gino?

Gloria,

There’s little value in continuing to ask others whether it’s worth investing in GDR at this stage. I’ve already contacted both Walbrook and GDR directly, urging them to take steps to reduce their cash burn.

I hope you’ve also taken the initiative to reach out to GDR, rather than remaining passive on this issue.

GloriaMarket,

You continue to reference past events, but no one has addressed my core question: What has actually been done about it?

Have you contacted anyone or taken any concrete steps? It's time to stop rehashing what happened and start taking meaningful action.

PanamaPete,

Just to clarify—I do not work for GDR. If you had reviewed my post history, you would be aware that I have a personal investment of £52,305.88 in this. I would appreciate it if you reviewed someone’s background before making such assumptions.

Thank you.

"To Kevin (and others constantly pushing for administration):

You keep repeating that administration is the best option for shareholders, and while everyone agrees that the Board must urgently reduce cash burn, I'm genuinely curious — have any of you actually taken action?

Have you written to Walbrook or directly to the company to voice your concerns or to suggest a better course of action?

If not, then what exactly is the point of posting the same doomsday narrative over and over again without trying to influence change?

Endlessly posting here does nothing. Either engage constructively or at least acknowledge that sitting back and repeating the same negative outlook helps no one — especially not shareholders."**

For individuals contemplating voting against the proposal in hopes of maximizing the value to be received by the administration, it is important to recognize that such an outcome is unlikely. It is probable that pharmaceutical companies possess knowledge regarding the likely parameters the administration may operate within and may consequently offer minimal benefits. Our optimal strategy for success is to vote affirmatively and collaborate to secure the necessary funds to continue operations until the subsequent year. Each vote holds significance, irrespective of the quantity of shares held. We are on the brink of achievement and with a collective effort, directed towards the right course, we can attain the rewards we have long awaited.

Ditto