Member Info for alfista

Doing a job aren't we?
I don't believe anyone reading this board doesn't know exactly what you are trying to do, but it will have zero effect because those that are here know what is on the horizon, and would be more inclined to add more than to sell on the, frankly pathetic, postings of a newly arrived ID with obvious connections to the past.

Do the MM's have juniors who are given this carppy task?

You do realise how very obvious you are.

Tiresome

PhD showing its worth, a promising expansion of market reach.
Plant based products have a clear opportunity in this era. Agree with them or not, veggies and vegans have the high ground in media perception.

Good progress IMHO

For the counters, just had my monthly repeat order email.
72957.

Gap bigger I think.

A highly prestigious association continues.
To be sole nutrition specialist to such a successful team sends a global message, creating consumer demand.
Well done SiS.

The packaging is Provexis. Could this be the mentioned expansion of Provexis Retail ?
S Korea population over 50 million, so a fair sized market.

Hard to believe that an individual would bear such ill will to other shareholders that he is prepared to continue this campaign indefinitely. A sad reflection on human nature. Nowhere near the lows, fact. Folks that bought at the lows could have taken a very handsome profit in a very short space of time, perhaps some have done just that. That's what happens in a market.

I assume you know where to view the trades?

Looking at the delayed reporting of that big trade, it does look like a buy rather than a sell

IMHO

Logical to assume that the better the blood flow means that there is a reduced chance that harmful cells can remain stuck in blood vessels. Easy to see where the original thinking was going, but I've not seen anything from Asim or Niamh stating that they have any ongoing studies.

A prospect, but not imminent perhaps?

You've seen such things over the years, scores of posts from newly arrived posters, calling the sp all day long.

You talk about unsubstantiated!.

Some 50% up on historic lows.
For those with better timing, a handsome profit.
For those that bought big at the peak, sold most to leave an unreachable average, every reason to be unhappy.
That's shares, nobody make anyone do it.

Because such a large percentage is tightly held, it could be argued that this has been overbought for years.
The director sell a while back was for the sole purpose of creating sufficient liquidity for an institution to take a holding. If any large buyer fancies some more, they'll have to prise them out of someone's hands.

I'm minded of a comment in a podcast by David Morgan a while back. He said he'd like to be at the head of a £200m turnover company, with a £2 share price. A laudable ambition, although I'm certain he could find a longer word to describe it.

The value of anything can never be precisely determined can it.
Anyone who attempts to would be instantly accused of ramping.
Mugs game.
In any share you buy, you think you can see upside, otherwise why buy it.
I've got a current one which has seen over 700% on my lowest buys, and had one that saw a ten fold increase.
Others have been, ahem, less fortunate.
That's share

Trades pushing to the top of Ask.
Liking it, but I can't find any reference to A trades on the list, only AT for SETS, which is a different system for 100 or 250 level.

I don't think they issue RNS for a conversation, but I believe the AA one in 2010 has the detail. Look back that far if you care to.

Fair point. One of the issues causing less buying is the lack of transparency in both the sales of all the Fruitflow products on the market, and the details of the profit share agreement signed in 2010. It was pointed out to me in a discussion that the agreement hasn't got that much longer to run. As you rightly say, that's another thing that could be viewed positively or negatively. The tiresome part is the compulsion P/C feels to retort with an unanswerable point.

Meaning?
As far as I can see, what Nigel has written is factual. The Chinese collaboration to further research and develop Fruitflow is yet to be signed, but they've already had a year's worth of studies funded solely by themselves.
All of which is stating the bleedin obvious of course.
Pumpky/Cinders can't help having a dig no matter what, knowing full well that the terms of the Alliance Agreement remain confidential. Tiresome and unnecessary IMO

Preaching to the choir perhaps?

More if you dig deeper.

Crikey!
As I said, no more from me on that topic.
Made that response unnecessary I would have thought.
Each to their own