Member Info for alfista

Of course you do. You doubt absolutely everything.

Agree with that Wellsite.
All of the information can be in the public domain, there is nothing wrong in assembling all that info in to a presentation. When all factors are gathered together, the overall prospect is excellent IMHO

Anyone with any suggestions as to how the recent high liquidity has been created?
I've been glancing at daily trades for a very long time, and the current period is so unusual.
Not a complaint, I'm loving it.

Well I think it puzzles everyone who has been involved in commerce. How can DSM give it the enthusiasm that they have done to date, without hitting a "major" ?
You obviously know who they have on the team as a brand manager. In his other role, he has achieved solid brand progress, and been involved in opening many new markets. Clearly the difference is that one of his companies has raised major funds, and has an impressive core of backers, whereas the other is strapped for cash, its core backers being mystery men. If only Provexis could become cash positive, then brand awareness would be much more feasible.
Interesting that you think much more could have been achieved, and at lower cost, because that flies in the face of everything I've experienced in trying to grow a brand. Cash speaks IMHO

Just as a balance, my experience of talking to IF is much different. He seemed to me frustrated that he couldn't answer many of my questions. He know that I have run a sales organisation for many years, therefore my questions are always the type that a MD would ask of a FD.
In assessing the role of COO/FD, I think it is valid to appreciate that all sales functions except FF+O3 are not his responsibility, at least until expiry of the AA. Provexis retail is stifled by an acute shortage of funds, dictating a cautious approach to marketing spend.
One tangential thought relating to the delay. SiS are currently seeking a new FD. Doubtful, but would create difficulties for PXS

Pumpcinders.
Would you accept that your thoughts and business case are economic illiteracy?
You criticise Wheelds for his optimism, but all you have to counter it is that you bought in to a far distant dream in 2009, but today that has become established around the globe sufficiently to be far closer to a reality. I know, you just like to jibe at other's opinions, but you have to justify yourself in some way. The number of shares in issue is a totally arbitrary measure, it means diddly In 2009, and today, the prospect is the same IMHO. One major product launch in to a mass consumer market, is the trigger. Will it happen? Won't it happen? Buy, hold or sell according to your own judgement.

What do I agree with?
What do you know?

Guesses is all anyone can offer, the RNS is no committal in either direction, so you viewpoint can come from the deep pit of misery that is Colb's mind, or a colossal potential, which is Wheeld's right to express, or any point in between.
Whatever it is, not a single one knows.

Far and away the majority of holders are sitting tight. That has been the situation for a long time.. Every single one accepts the truth, that we had no idea how long commercialisation would take, apart from a comment in a webinar when SiS was bought, that there would be a long spell when there was little news on Fruitflow. If our commercial partner was showing any less enthusiasm things would look tricky, but they aren't. If our prospective partner in China are to make a big splash in their consumer market then supply of raw material would have to be planned, it isn't feasible to assume that a large increased availability of a source could appear by magic.

As for funding, the update appeared earlier last year due to the requirement. My opinion is that the China collaboration will require more funding, and my guess that this has been the source of of the major participants in previous round suggests to me that such funding is achievable.

UK and export sales of Fruitflow+ have continued to advance, but by how much remains to be seen. Another quarter has already passed since the financial year end. I'd expect that the H&B partnership will have increased revenues.

I am sure the poster knows that Fruitflow was featured in The Mail a long, long time ago.
If he doesn't, we can add appalling memory to the habitual malicious intent.

For many days, they have matched a supposed Sell with a supposed Buy at the same price.
So blinkin obvious, they must have a very low opinion of anyone who is impressed by it.
Have a word with them Naz, might be a promotion in it for you. Tea lad perhaps

Having seen posted the list of who was selling shares on the back of the promises published, it seems obvious who has been the main beneficiary. Where folks developed their trust that any of the claims made were based on reality, I have no idea. I am genuinely sorry for the poster on another site that thinks he will see dividends in the future, because I think he is in denial of what happened over the last 5 years.

Is someone taking care of the Tortoise?

Will the chat boards follow the share trading in to oblivion now?
It would be interesting to know if there will be repercussions coming the way of those responsible.
Perhaps today's action forms the first part of that process. Britdaq must have recognised something in recent movements that was wrong according to their (fairly relaxed) standards, and, if they say it isn't coming back, that would appear to be that.

To all the attackers over almost five years, I hope they will learn that an honest point of view shouldn't be met with abuse.

Let's be ever so clear Picto.
My "agenda" is, and only ever has been, truth.
When I first looked at how Doug Where created an illusion of profit and liquidity back in 2014, I said so. Got shot down by myriad posters at the time.

Was I wrong?

In the light of successive liquidator reports, the answer is obvious.

Fully agree with Manifesto. A claimed worldwide investor who happens to only post on a share almost 5 years suspended, in compulsory liquidation. The HC&R comment must irritate the heck out of others, some of whom may have been the buyers of the shares which supposedly give him a free carry. He's so relaxed that he invariable first on the scene of every update, despite those updates continually confirming the worthlessness of the shares.

Sorry, for me this guy has to have close connections with the perpetrators of this charade.

Seems to me that it is just a case of how long the available funds will last, so that the suits can carry on drawing their fees. I guess the limit is not that far ahead now.
Then the music will stop IMHO

Back up to the highs now.
What was I worried about?
:-))

Agree with your comments. I was poised to let go of a small proportion, and hovered over the sell button, but then the phone rang and the moment was gone. Hey ho, the dividend is good and getting better, the company performance has been excellent, and the new car can wait a while :-)

If you mean do I think this is still undervalued? Yes.
The knowledge of shares to be issued at a level set as the trigger point may anchor the sp around that price IMHO
But, as yesterdays post stresses, my judgement isn't always to be relied upon.
ATB

Another example of The Law of Unintended Consequences.
The concept of incentivising key folks to create shareholder value is sound. My post of 15th April mentioned that the threshold had been crossed. However, I failed to appreciate the effect that confirmation of the execution of the agreement would have on the share price that had risen so strongly above the threshold.
As a result, I'm looking at a dimwit in the mirror today.