Member Info for alfista

Perhaps they see a big market in US Donald voters.
:-)

If you say so.
It was certainly an item of consideration last year.
That's not to say when, or if, it would happen. If revenues climbed as intended, I would be untroubled if things stayed as they are, but would hope for a somewhat more substantial physical entity to be re-established. Only execs being Ian and Niamh is not ideal IMHO

Maybe one more speculation to add to your list Bern.

By Health are an acquisitive company.

No more to add at this stage

Fully agree, a simple review of RNS's issued for years confirms this news, tying up the collaboration with a giant Chinese partner, is by far the most significant. Very happy that Dr Niamh is in charge of it, and that her old trainee is the direct link in China in his now senior position. The contribution to costs is nominal, helping along the way to proper commercial launches when Blue Cap status is achieved.

A boost to sentiment IMHO

In agreement with Bern. Why did this take an extra month? There is zero exceptional info.
Other than that, modest revenue growth, more than offset by investment in patent protection, which is vital so acceptable IMHO.
A non event, we are where we were, waiting on China progress in the main.
IMHO

And for the gawd know's how many times of asking.
With no executive officers then left at the company, who would do the recruitment. Where would they find anyone with enough knowledge of the complexities of the patents, the agreements and pending agreements, the contacts with the scientists and Alliance executives to take up a key role and make a difference with no financial headroom to do so?
You have never answered that, because you can't. It's a damned fool notion coming out of a vindictive mind (IMO of course)

So what would you describe the By Health projects as?

All too easy to post throw away jibes, ignoring published info.

Not taken personally. My opinion is that you have zero respect for all other shareholders who have willingly held on the basis that Fruitflow is still at the very beginning of its global development. That you wish ill on all of us is hard to comprehend

Whoever bought the million shares in the only trade of the day paid more than Wheelds paid for his yesterday.
Results RNS, whether attached to other news or not, will at least draw a line under the mean spirited nasty minded suspicion forced on us by a poster who had bid us farewell months ago.

If only

Other exchange

http://www.nexexchange.com/member?securityid=18752

Very sorry, wrong board

On other exchange
http://www.nexexchange.com/member?securityid=18752

Commendable performance.
Puzzling market reaction.
Debt ratio not quite negligible yet, but getting there.

Big thanks to all at The Mission.

Bern. Sorry that you regards chit chat on a bulletin board as lacking sufficient gravity. Academic it certainly wasn't, more a practical argument, Bella felt she had sufficient experience of advertising to think it a good use of funds, whereas I am much more cynical about it. Either way, I agree it would make little difference what either of us think. Bella thinks she should have influenced Mr Ford, I wouldn't attempt to.

Fruitflow + products could, in principle, become global. They are light enough and therefore transportable to any market. In order to go that route it would have been necessary to raise a lot of cash and expand the operation, and that isn't going to happen IMHO. So, we are agreed that Provexis Retail isn't the value adding part of the business, but would be a bonus if it could raise sales to, say, a few multiples of current.

Unsurprising that we are passing the time of day chewing the cud about it, given that there is a dearth of other news at present. That'll change at some time this month.

The issue with advertising has become more difficult year by year. The reason is a fragmentation of target audiences. How many ways are there to view a particular product these days, hundreds of channels, be it mainstream traditional media, online offerings, gateways etc, retailer promotions, and on and on. In my industry I constantly challenge people who try to tap my advert budget to provide me with value for spend. They can't, when the result of a campaign is disappointing, they simply say spend more. Provexis are strapped for cash, could they risk funds knowing that this may result in criticism. Every form of promotion costs a lot and delivers little. Stuffers in packets are an annoyance, asking consumers to do your promotion for you is certainly as low a cost method as any, but, unless the target market is receptive, would it pay its way?

Has to be something justifiably exceptional behind the delay.

Totting up income and outgoings clearly couldn't result in such a delay, the business model is hardly complex. Therefore another matter that would have a material effect on prospects is to be attached IMHO. Good or bad? The market isn't factoring in movement either way.

Surely it's DSM that are doing the supporting?

You could also put me on ignore, then you wouldn't have to read my condemnation of your snide attempts to destroy this company just because you made the free choice to buy in and part sell out at the times you did. I see that as grossly unfair to those who have different viewpoints and strategies. Your language is nothing but bitterness.

Well, as a small PI with a fair few, 1p wouldn't tempt me even though there would be a nice profit at that level. I sincerely hope you'll be gone at that level though, as the sustained misery isn't pleasant to witness. Surely life has more to offer than that. Win or lose, it's a risk game, accept it and quit the boring and completely unqualified "advice"

Chartists puzzle me, they think a tightly held share can become more liquid than it has been for years and, hey presto!, before your very eyes. Good luck to them anyway.

Wouldn't disagree with you, as StockBoy says, we each must choose a time to let some go if there's a profit to be had. This having become a dividend paying share, that also weighs the argument in favour of a hold overall for me.

Looking at The Mission website does reinforce my view that this has become a much more substantial proposition over the years I've been watching it. Has the possibility of it being a target increased? Looks that way to me, but not imminently IMHO