Member Info for alfista

The company purchased initial stock, then announced that it had bought a larger production batch.

So, how would you equate that with your claim that purchase orders may exceed 68,008.

We can all see that you don't believe it, that you can not support it in any way other than to cause friction.

No one is bullying you, I simply pointed out that, when you ran out of logic previously, you flounced off in a huff.

Paw1 posted a reasonable post in response to my factual post, that my repeat order for April is 68008. In reply, I posted a reasonable post which contained nothing but fact. What is it about that which caused you to tread in to the realms of fantasy about purchases exceeding sales? The answer is because I posted something. the proof is that you don't do it when anyone else has posted.

A weird habit, irritating to all that read it.

There is a total lack of basic logic in that claim. We KNOW that stock is bought in blocks, to date purchase order numbers would be in single figures.

However you regard the Sales Order numbers, you can not deny that the numeric gap each months keeps increasing.
My post DOES SAY that we need the financial update from the company to have anything provably accurate. However, as it was me that wrote something, you felt compelled to write a cock and bull response.

Don't you think that all the readers of this board are heartily sick of you trying to invent an argument no matter what? My post was moderate and factual, no way did it merit such a nonsense reply.

You've flounced off in a huff twice already, time for the hat trick?

Agree with you.
No way to tell really, but the pattern of orders appears to be on the up.
If DSM payments are also rising, then financing gap closes. Only way to know for sure is from official report, everything else is opinion.

For those keeping the score, order 68008 this month

Fairly obvious, given that Jay is not a young man, and has seen two close associates pass in recent times.

Sensible strategy IMHO

Just Bed & ISA'd the remainder of my allowance, both transactions show up as sells. Not the case, more than happy to hold for the divi and further growth potential here.

Not at all surprised.

They no longer work at night, wearing balaclavas.
Far more effective these days. Ask any copper.

Sorry typo, damage.

Put it in perspective please.
Nothing more than a mild recovery from the low.
Unless we are informed of something concrete, I don't see the volume rising to provide upwards pressure.
We saw a couple of sizeable buys last week, that's all.
Folks who pretend they know something remind me of Del, and that poster did real dame.
GLA

It would be, but the improved gross profit margin indicates that they have been making more gross margin, not less.

Begbies have said something about WRN, in official reports.
Why would they make up their advice, they would be liable if it were wrong.
Hope is only coming from one source, and even he is now describing a return as a miracle.
Sorry for genuines.

Bless
Such research, such insightful analysis.

Growth, once achieved, reduce spending on expansion marketing, profit, lots of it.
That's the strategy, exceeded projections so far.

Another undertaking broken, not a politician by any chance?

The rule seems to be that all must remain in sullen silence.

Life isn't like that is it, opinions vary.

It's a very free market. Owners of piddly amounts of shares can walk away at the click of a button, off to pastures new where staff are paid the minimum wage and nothing is spent on expanding to become a global brand, with the ambition of becoming THE global brand.
Walk away you dissatisfied, why wouldn't you?

The info I got in discussion with Mr Ford was that they came very close to concluding an agreement, but the financial crisis caused CC to cancel all new products, then of course DSM took over marketing.
Interesting that they refer to Flyfit DSM isn't it.

Let's have a little think. Why would I discredit a negative poster, one that only appeared because I had to cheek to post on another board where he has championed the cause of a share that has been suspended since 2014, is in compulsory liquidation, and where the liquidator has several times reported that the shares have no value?

Maybe you could pop over there Puk and put your shoulder to that particular wheel.

I do try not to post on WRN very often, out of respect for the innocents. Unfortunately, the few remaining disciples who haven't been banned on this site see it as fair game to chase me back here, recycling the same comments time and again.

To explain to someone genuine why the road to market for Fruitflow has been slow would take a mini novel of a post, so forgive me if I don't bore the rest of the readers explaining what genuines already know to a poster who is only interested in petty share bashing.

Total unresearched rubbish.
And all because someone dares to be honest about a share that was suspended almost four and a half years ago.
If Fruitflow was nothing special, By Health wouldn't be funding six different trials.
Fruitflow is very special, take a look at the patents

Yes, future sales potential. They don't make anything, so the assets are just bits and pieces. they hold the IP for Fruitflow, which is being globally marketed, and is currently awaiting Blue Cap approval in China through By Health, a company with a market cap of $3 billion.

That potential is not yet reflected in the share price. When it is, you are welcome to come back and be laughed at.
If you believe anything that I wrote on WRN is other than an honest view, come back at me on there with facts. Posting on here in immediate revenge is the pathetic bit.

Sorry Provexis folks, I dared to put an honest comment on WRN.
Hence the response by one of the childish posters from there

On a read through of the report, it seems that one of the biggest costs billed by the liquidator is correspondence with shareholders who are asking whether there is any value for them, even though they state that shares are worth nothing.
Still, although they have been forced to discount fees to a mere £278 per hour, they'll be happy as larry to keep on responding until there are no funds left.

I personally feel that anyone who is still suggesting that WRN shares could have any value is being unnecessarily uncharitable, since it just prolongs the suffering.