Member Info for Alfacomp

Hopefully not redundant Ophidian - just filling in a few more gaps.

Hey there Ophidian - I forgot to ask if you liked my article on the Vametco mine visit:-

https://www.thebushveldperspective.com/blog/public-articles-1/post/vametco-mine-visit-407

and the processing plant:-

https://www.thebushveldperspective.com/blog/public-articles-1/post/vametco-processing-plant-visit-408

I thought they complemented your previous article on the subject pretty well:-

https://www.thebushveldperspective.com/blog/public-articles-1/post/vanadium-production-at-vametco-an-overview-380

that will be wife (no, look the 'd' and 'f' ARE next to one another on the keyboard).

Good summary Richken - hope your wide is doing well and getting better.

I agree Ophidian - I am going to go back to listening to Richard Burton and 'Under Milk Wood'

Souldoubt - yes it is gambling, if you refuse to do any research.

I can't believe I am wasting my time on this numbskull, but there it is I'm obviously sainted.

For you and everyone else that is interested UT is an uncrossing trade which is explained, amongst other things, here:-

https://www.thebushveldperspective.com/blog/public-articles-1/post/auctions-uncrossing-trades-and-evidence-of-manipulation-291

SouDoubt - we cannot believe an argument that you have not actually made. What actually is your argument, let us hear it ?

not true inner-harmony yet again you fail to understand how the market works.

If they have taken the shares from the seller then it must be published, and we would see it, and it would enter the trade analysis summations. The point is that if they have not yet taken the shares from the seller then they have the option to muck about with the market by taking themselves a short position, try running a short to get the market to give them cheap shares by moving the price down to below the minimum price that the seller wishes to accept - here approximately 40p. If they succeed they take those shares and say to their seller - sorry can't sell your shares just yet at the price you want, we'll try again next week. Rinse and repeat. If they fail in the short then they simply print the sellers shares and make their money on the difference between the average sell price of their short position and the value they have to give the seller.

The market makers have two options and simply play it so that they have the choice of the more lucrative result for them. Very easy for them. The trick for an amateur hour shorter is not to expose that you have shorted the share because if you do then the MMs can simply move the price up forcing a short squeeze on you - as they did on the 12th of december.

It is patently obvious with all the trolling in the last week or so, plus the patterns of share sells between 8 and 10m each morning that there are amateur shorts currently in play. I shall not reveal the quantity or strike price of that position publicly here as it gives too much information away far too easily. At present the amateur hour shorters are all playing the game of trying to fool some even dimmer shorters to come in and sell them the shares that they need to close their shorts. In some ways this would yield a marginally moral outcome as the last and laziest shorters will get stiffed the most. The rest of us don't really care about that though - we are more focused on the future gains that will appear once this nonsensical period ends.

Yes it is your unresearched opinion. So maybe you should do some research first before coming out with your opinion piece.

not true mask - if the market maker has a background sell they are working and have a short position established as a result then the clearly do have an interest in whether the SP rises or falls. In fact they have an interest in seeing it fall because then they have the option of taking their sellers shares or if others are stupid enough to sell at a lower price (either shares they own or don't, i.e. selling short themselves) then they will simply take those first thank you very much.

You are right though when you say it is about ensuring their profitability.

The mercenerary geologist (Mickey Fulp) mentioned at 13:00 that one of the mines in SA shutdown which reduce global supply - this is not strictly accurate - it was Highveld Steel which shutdown - admittedly they did supply their Vanadium sl-a-g to Vanchem which also took ore from Mapochs but the real source of that Vanadium was coming from the Highveld steelworks.

There is clearly no love lost between Gerald of Prophecy and Mickey at 16:00 - however gerald is not quite right when he says that we don't know if China is going to stop exporting Vanadium - we do know that they have already become a nett importer.

Srob - why don't you set one up ?

yes expert, calder capital did an analysis here:-

https://www.thebushveldperspective.com/blog/public-articles-1/post/bushveld-minerals-vs-aim120-financial-analysis-281

Srob - I think that you had better take this up with your friend, and do a bit more research next time. Fortunately on this stock, unlike all the others on AIM, there is a really good publicly available source of information called the Bushveld Perspective. Did you take the chance to read that before you spent 8,000 pounds on shares ?

https://www.thebushveldperspective.com

Expert - it is actually 74%

You have absolutely no idea what is going on here 1onic

No it wouldn't you don't have any clue what you are talking about

Lol - I found it very funny when he accused knuttie of being bitter - does he know how much money knuttie has made on BMN ? No don't answer that of course he has no idea.

To add the RK's excellent summary there's also the articles published on TBP in the last week:-

https://www.thebushveldperspective.com/blog/public-articles-1/post/vametco-mine-visit-407

https://www.thebushveldperspective.com/blog/public-articles-1/post/vametco-processing-plant-visit-408

https://www.thebushveldperspective.com/blog/public-articles-1/post/eskom-battery-site-visit-410

To be honest I'm surprised that the last article has not had more than 1,000 reads yet - did I miss a memo that said that climate change had been solved ?