RE: Storage costs17 Sep 2019 00:29
SG - that's the key point - they can only get the required cost for battery storage down to the incredibly low levels that they are claiming that they can achieve for their spin-off company (ahhh yes they neglected to mention that perhaps) if they require that the PV + wind penetration is as high as 100%.
It is next to impossible to conceive of a complete energy system in which full decarbonisation can happen without the generation of some green fuels such as green (i.e. generated from excess renewable electricity) hydrogen, methanol or ammonia - this is because the further from the temperate regions you are the more of a seasonal storage requirement you have - the only way to deal with this is to generate and store green fuels for heating, and maybe electrical, use in the cold season. This might be achieved through excess generation in the summer, or, I think more likely, generation in the hot regions of the globe, followed by transportation. Much like transporting oil right now, except the stuff will not have come out of the ground, but instead out of the sky, as water, Nitrogen and CO2.
These round trip efficiency of these fuels is significantly lower than for batteries, which will always have a place for daily and weekly peak shifting, but fuel will need to be stockpiled for interseasonal balancing. You can kind of think of the green fuel system as like a mega battery that you charge and discharge only once a year.