Member Info for Albinio74

Good interview - helps put some meat on the bones of the recent update, so i am still upbeat here.

In such a fast moving world just sitting back on the core concept and business would be a mistake so recognising the value of the data and marketing side of things and combining that with the opportunistic acquisition of audiens could (should) prove invaluable.

Great stuff - really shows they have taken a lot on board - the pics themselves may not drive SP but seeing is beleiving so nice to see them active in Greenland and perfectly timed with so many eyes looking this way due to HH.

Last we'll see of DZ for a while i think.

http://www.prospectorsparadise.com/about-gold/geology-of-gold/

I am no geologist but i know a c..... No, that is something else.

Joking aside i am no expert but i read the rns info, lots of posts and google things etc but unless you have real knowledge of not only the gelogy but the mining industry we could probably be told all sorts and never really know what to make of it.

Anyway the above link i think is a fairly rounded easy to follow explanation of how gold deposits form

Plappers - rather than deriding what others say, you can also add your own knowledge/view and links to back it - if you say someone is clueless but show nothing to make that claim and your own views credible it just becomes lost in generic meaningless BB blurb.

Sometimes it takes time for good news to be digested, and this comes against quite a backdrop of negative sentiment.

A few trigger happy PIs are unlikely to cause a surge here, they need a dolop of institutional confidence to be shown.

I had hoped for a quick gain here over a few months but prepared to sit on what I have and maybe get a few more while around this price.

If they actually manage a run of good news it seems inconceivable to me that the sp will languish here for long.

Some perfectly good points but no one here disputes the qualities of Bluejays license, the more advanced state or that there is a "winner" scenario.

In fact Alba need Bluejay to succeed and is a case study for Alba to try and follow - think most here just hoping over time to achieve an appropriate sp.

Daramuda has (deliberately it seems) set out to rattle cages and got some basics badly wrong and failed to provide any evidence for the more controversial cliams made.

Bluejay, in one form or another, have been there longer but Alba are not Greenland novices currently with 4 projects there.

And what has Melville Bay got to do with TBS - it is not a mineral sands target and has bee reduced to "desk top" analysis/work as per RNS output.

Daramuda - have worked out which way is North and where Thule air base is yet?

Any links for Bluejay's testing on TBS yet?

Amitsoq - agreed expenditure moratorium with Greenland authorities while they focus on TBS and Inglefield. You may be interested to know Bluejay/Finnaust once did the same thing during their early work in Greenland.

Following on from dsfat's post this is the same flyover but with commentary from HB.

https://youtu.be/x54P2Nx2fPU

its Albinio - i am very pasty but play football like a Brazilian.

I just can't grasp your stance - there are loads of exploration companies similar to GGP - they all keep passing the hat round until something is proved up and sold - not a complicated proposition.

i think it is borderline mad or malicious to suggest nothing has changed in the last year, lots of progress since the turn of the year and edging closer to delivering (or failing).

If nothing major materialises over the next 12-18 months from the current main focuses i am sure a lot of people like me will be off onto the next thing that catches our eye and maybe a new license will crop up and a new batch of investors will come in.

I am willing to take the gamble they are onto a couple winners here now.

Can also see the attraction of trading too but not for me - useless at it, although managed to dip in and out opportunistically after the NM situation played out in Jan and Feb.

That is promising on Brockham - unbelievable how this has been dragged out.

Did anyone see the tweet about the scottish gold nugget recently found - let's hope plenty of those still around Clogau - only a few hundred miles away, but i get the gist of the Tweet.

Doubt we will get much info on Greenland until the Autumn so HH, Brockham, maybe Clogau (maybe even Ireland) news for the summer it seems.

Check out @AlbaMinerals’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/AlbaMinerals/status/1022429553258586114?s=09

I would also recommend following them on Twitter - not info of huge magnitude but little reminders of who they are working with, upcoming events or if attending an event and recruitment tweets - all give an idea of how things are progressing.

Also go on their website - loads of info there but like some tweets helps give an insight - e.g. the careers section of their site.

Look up the backgrounds to some of the key directors/management.

Also worth looking through who the key investors are.

I find it hard to gauge a value, i invested based on low mc, cash in the bank and promising sector they are in, combined with some of the unique patent protected features in their technology.

I have to concede i do not really understand the mechanics and drivers in their market though - product lifespans, speed of tech change, competitors etc.

Their stated aim of 17-19 million revenue by 2022 is interesting as they appear keen to clarify these figures are not forecasts and also talk of multiple areas they believe offer new markets for their kit, and there is the uncertainty surrounding the potential with their global partner - might be huge, or may take longer to bare fruit.

I plan to hold these for the longterm as if they hit the suggested figures, find new markets to exploit and the global partner work comes good seems not too ott to hope for a 100m m cap over the next few years.

Special has quite a track record on GGP - obsessed with investing in plant/facilities/income etc (perfectly reasonable) yet last October invested in GGP and proclaimed on this board what a fab balance sheet it had and how well run it all looked - an exploration company with no income or assets (other than exploration licenses).

Then spent ever since it seems condeming the very things that are common to pretty much all exploration companies until they can prove something up and sell it, and seems to think investors in such companies do not understand what they are investing in or the associated risks - very good of him.

It is all very odd - Bluejay look like they are on the edge of going to the next level and Alba pose no threat what so ever, so hard to grasp the animosity.

If all the points made were factual or backed by evidence the warning others from a platform of goodwill would make sense.

But there have been a number of things stated that are factually wrong as you have pointed out and the bizarre post suggesting you can't trust the Alba RNS output and website (that he/she then tried to suggest they had not said).

He/she seems fixated on Alba trying to raise substantial sums against current mcap. Bluejay raised 17m this year - they would not have done so if valued at 10m! As the asset is proved up the mcap goes up minimising dilution against later fund raises. If Alba can raise 1.5m at 8m mcap 15m at 100m would be no problem.

If they get a credible and significant resource estimate from this summers work, hopefully JORC compliant, the sp will fly( assuming the initial enviromental work is positive).

Once Bluejay get offtake partners confirmed and their long awaited feasability study i am sure their sp will crack on again - they also have some potential in their other interests.

Hope everything goes well for them, if i had some spare cash i would be tempted to put some this way.

No not really different - you are clearly suggesting information on their website, which is mostly contained in their RNS output, can't be trusted.

You also said this just today

"A proper drilling campaign is thus as near as da*n it impossible to succeed." we will see.

You also rather oddly suggested (unless i was lost in context) that Albas sample testing i was talking about, should have been evident in a JORC - why they were just samples gauging quality and they are now in phase 1of gauging qauntity, hopefully enough to produce a maiden JORC (not a guarantee of JORC).

You seem very keen to undermine Alba's prospects Greenland prospects without any evidence.

Alba have been there a few years now seemingly working well with the authorities.

Daramuda you posted the following 6th July

"I would not personally rely on the information concerning Qaanaak on the Alba website"

Rampair, we know BJ had TBS - but there is no info regarding them testing it - interesting to see evidence for this work whatever it revealed.

However, Daramuda clearly tries to suggest Alba are misleading investors with their RNS statements and reporting of their work there - is that what you are saying also?

I am pretty sure no one here is under any illusions that Bluejay are years ahead of Alba in their development, but have also been at or around their current SP for quite sometime.

They (BJ) suggested in a Tweet yesterday that news must be coming soon so probably good for them - maybe info on off-take partners and the long awaited feasibility study from SRK, who Howard Baker used to work for and coincidentally are our advisers on Clogau.

Daramuda on this board and Bluejay's has so far:

Accused Alba of misleading investors about the test results they took last season and initial quality shown (with no evidence)
Claimed that Bluejay extensively tested TBS and rejected it, but has no evidence for this anywhere
And now that Alba have lied about the drilling programme this summer and that it is not possible to undertake the work claimed (with no evidence again)
Oh and that Alba investors do not understand the difference between stated aim and a completed objective.

Alba's fortunes will have no effect on Bluejay so all a little desperate and quite frankly odd.

That is great dsfat! would never have occurred to me