Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Good to see Afake put in his place by a city pro. it seems h'es been posting 'meaningless blah blah' all along lol. just goes to that getting posts taken down because they expose you as a fake doesn't work and just makes you look an even bigger numpty :-)
Talking of 'furgetting' stuff about shorting, it looks like Afake has had a 'senior moment' or two. he forgets that even spread betting forums like IG have to borrow stock to back short bets, as they won't take risk positions themselves. it's pretty difficult to borrow in stocks like san leon and even if they could they would be on worst terms and on very quick recalls. moreover you won't be able to do anything of any size and anyway who's going to lend - Martin Hughes? i think that's pretty unlikely and the same goes for Oisin and Jite. maybe the stock got professionally shorted on the run down to 12p but if so did they see the run up to 16.5p? unlikely, which now means they're stuck suspended in the worst of all worlds, with only worse to come with good news about audited accounts and new funding on the immediate horizon. so seems again that the bloviating troll is in dreamland with mickey mouse and pluto.
I notice you don't deal with any of the other fabrications i listed, Junkie, does that mean you accept them? as for your pathetic attempt to pass the buck on your shorts lie to lse, you can take a running jump. i already explained that lse wouldn't have sophisticated sources of information on short positions, so it's up to you to check first before stating something as verbatim truth much like the problems you've all had with nigerian journalists. you guys just don't help yourselves but you'll get no peace from me, so don't expect any.
pull the other one, junkie, it's got bells on. where to start that is the real question? i don't imagine you'd particularly enjoy a walk down memory lane and revisit those halcyon days of how sun trust was going to bust san leon? come to think of it san leon being busted by some nigerian creditor, which has connections with the seamier end of the local press, has been a pretty consistent theme with you trolls over time. and at the same time of course we had all that ****** about eroton being the assignor of the operating license for oml18 from mart western and failing to give notice of assignment to the state authorities (your implication being that the whole transaction was void). maybe i should let off that one, as it became clear you didn’t understand the difference between an assignor and an assignee or that of course eroton was the assignee!? your recent fabrication, as you know was the claim that san leon had no short positions open, which if true, rather exposed your mate as a liar as well lol. this is what you said: 'it will tell you that there are no open short positions in sle. so please stop acting like a child.' is that enough lies for you?
Yeah thanks BS. 'Give us all a break from all the shorts and long chat nonsense'. think you probably need to direct that remark to Junkie or Afake, as we're not the ones telling porkie pies. as the old playground chant goes liar liar pants on fire :-)
Another non-story from the Irish Independent. their headline states that an 'embattled san leon has been hit with another lawsuit' and yet, if you bother to read the piece it says: 'We have received no communication from the court and neither have we received any letter before action or other notification from Ocean Pearl of a pending or threatened legal claim,” said a spokesperson for San Leon.' that's not bizarre, it's just bad journalism. i do love the way you Trolls are suckers for every cr#p article about san leon, particularly if it's negative. while i'm about fake stories, i don't think i've seen an explanation about whether Afake was telling porkies about his short positions in san leon? i wouldn't say we're waiting with bated breath, rather that we're not holding our breath :-)
'if only 10% is true' i generally find with Sahara reports, BS, as a rule of thumb it's best to discount what they say by 50% and then by another 30%. that is no guarantee their article isn’t completely fabricated however. i agree though that commenting break-ups and death in submersibles is much more up the Trolls' Strasse. it requires an appetite for distaste.
Still no answer i see on whether Afake has been telling us porkies about his 'successful' shorting campaign over time. to remind, responding to redeyemines' post about short positions getting closed, Junkie informed us that there were no short positions open in san leon. he said this was verified by clicking on the lse short positions tab. i'm now confused since, if he's correct about this, it means his mate Afake has been telling porkies and for some considerable time lol. hopefully clarification will be provided shortly :-)
Indeed POORS. desperate measures from the trolls now. maybe they should focus on the gossip columns of the Irish Independent, like this story from the same edition?
https://www.seeandso.com/royals/prince-william-and-kates-relationship-under-scrutiny-after-appearance-at-jordanian-wedding-935
I notice Junkie you don't comment on my substantive point, so no change there. i was wondering if your proposition about there being no short positions open weren't correct, it would strongly suggest your mate Afake was telling porkies about his great and apparently most successful shorting of san leon over time. you tell me?
'It will tell you that there are no open short positions in SLE.' sorry Junkie wrong again. lse will be getting their info 3rd hand and certainly don't have sophisticated sources on open short positions. the normal rule is that short positions over .5% have to be declared. if the lse info tells us anything it's that short positions in san leon are held by small people like daytrader types eg perhaps your mate Afake?
'Mr readysteady. could go anyways. ups downs.'
'I haven't a notion what will happen post suspension' well redeyemines the trolls seem to have all angles covered. they have that wonderful advantage of being ignorant without it inhibiting their propensity to express meaningless opinions :-)
Surely not bandit. Afake has always said he's a big player and been shorting this through the whole piece, so how can you doubt him? moreover Junkie has always maintained he has never held any stock in san leon, although that's pretty weird and probably irrelevant just like him :-)
'The saying "Always judge your friends by the company they keep" - comes to mind.' in your case, BS, that'll be your old muckers Afake and Junkie? boy you guys have hit some new lows here, looking to make political capital out of this tragic event. talking of friends, i guess Oisin has lost a good one in Paul-Henri Nargeolot, who would have been on the trips Oisin made. Nargeolot was a retired French Navy commander aged 77. he was a specialist on the Titanic, having made more trips down than anyone else. how do we know he became a friend of Oisin's? well only guessing but they named a newly discovered ridge at nearly 4000 metres down the ' Nargeolot-Fanning ridge. keep up the good work chaps, nothing quite like a bit of old fashioned ad hominem on our ceo to get the bile juices flowing :-)
So just a quick summary of what we've discovered from ABC over the last couple of days. it's hugely exciting stuff and to top that C informs us he has a direct source in Eroton. it doesn’t get better than the horse's mouth! so what scintillating info have we discovered? to start apparently the theft of oil continues. this will come as a shock to many, who thought that the oil thieves had handed themselves in to comply with president tinubu's request to do so. next we find out the mother ship possibly has a name and even more amazing it actually does hold 250,000 barrels of oil! many will say they knew that already but remember this is from the horse's mouth. finally we discover that the mother ship was anchored somewhere off the niger delta, although it may no longer be. well that's it and i hope you agree that, with this valuable research from ABC, we would be none the wiser. (have i got that right?).