RE: Underwhelmed8 Apr 2024 16:00
Miller67, this was exactly my concern when I first posted here in November :
"The related party carve ups between TM1, Century Cobalt, Recyclus and CLG don't pass the sniff test I'm afraid... Any buying will be aggressively sold into. It may be allowed to float up and down on the tide as new mugs are suckered in via telegram and other chit-chat, but the overall direction will be down. Anyone buying or holding here is asking for it IMHO.
Second post :
"I have done a little homework since the RNS and none of the reasons I can come up with for structuring this series of related party deals like this are positive for TM1 shareholders."
Third post :
"OK, I'll be blunt. There is one very obvious potential reason why you would structure the deal between the three related parties in the way they have. The funds come from mug punters recruited in telegram groups and via other chit-chat buying shares in TM1. Who is selling? Read the RNS again really carefully and try to join the dots for yourself.
This deal, between the related parties and on the terms disclosed, is not a normal straight up loan facility between a lender and a borrower secured on the assets of the borrower. You have to ask yourself why? And when you think about that, who wins and who loses becomes clear.
Look, if you think this is about to start throwing off tons of cash, the debt all gets paid off and you are left with enough enterprise value to make you all richer than Richard the Rich, that's great. Fill your boots.
But I'm telling you, that deal disclosed on Tuesday is not the sort of normal, commercial transaction a good public company with good prospects would do on a 10% margin. IMHO it lines up holders and future buyers here for a potential shafting.
So if it does end up that way, don't say you weren't warned."
And five months on, I stand by it all.