Member Info for AIMtodeath

5 years ago no one anticipated the arrse dropping out of Lithium either. Hindsight is a wonderful thing.. ..

This hit 17p in that time soooooo..... Those buying at 3-5p could have profited well.

Stop creating new messages!

Welcome onboard....

Wasa, SAV were to be hot producer.. .. . Not the spodumene :) but yes lithium is going nuts again, set to hit previous highs.

You don't know your South American countries very well then if you are making that comparison.. ..

Explain how you will lose money? Your comments getting dumber by the day.

Another day another new technology...... zzzzzzz. SAV is a shortish mine life in comparison to some and probably 100% of the people holding shares now won't be in 5 years, I don't care what happens after that.

For Energy tech only....
https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/infographic/2019/02/26/climate-smart-mining

https://twitter.com/21Lucker/status/1402334795573649414

If SAV get the EIA approved they are the hottest to be 'spodumene' producer in EU. DFS end of year likely to be minimum $400m to $500m NPV (due to doubling resource, savings not sending ore to China and higher by-product returns over Scoping study)
Look at C1 Cash costs (including royalties) to compare Lithium companies.

As for HZM the jurisdiction and lowest quartile mine costs speak for themselves. If HZM can't get financed at $18k Nickel NO ONE WILL.....

Well I haven't driven more than 100 miles in one day in over a year and that is with working too.

Big'a'rsehole is a postional trader and has been trading this share for ever and says what they think will affect the price in the direction they want it to go. They also lie....

I'd rule out any buyer not prepared to process the spodumene in EU. However, doubt we will pay CIF now. It will be FOB if it did go overseas.

So GALP very much have their sights still set on SAV supply, but now SAV are un a position to negotiate a better deal! That RNS should have increased the share price!!!!! Knee jerkers have read the situation wrong, GALP info could have been more useful a week ago, proving DAs words that GALP are still in play.

Wouldn't be the first time we have been confused with another Savannah. Savannah Petroleum being one of them. We had a Barclays broker now of 65p one day! Sadly nit ys.... Haha.

Or Galp trying to get too much too cheap but lithium pricing and new interest has made Galp deal not good enough. Galp still need to get their own refinery plans in place before they can commit to offtake.

Discussions are trying to tie up LOM in a deal, normally AUS miners 3-5yeaea,but EU if yoy get a deal fir scarce spodumene you want to keep your mitts on it.. . . . Those discussions don't happen overnight... Equally Galp has refinery talks and tie-ups with potentially Northvolt to sign off first. Those delayed, we are delayed.

How would one release an EIA that was not complete? Until the conformity is passed by APA it is an unfinished/incomplete document. The APA was doing due diligence on the submission on behalf of all interested parties and twice asked for more information or detail to ensure it was complete enough for them. To note it is not SAVs fault if anything is missing deemed not covered enough, that was the role of the APA to satisfy themselves that SAV had adequately responded to all elements of the APA's requirements.
For all the crusty noise that the document is this or that, it is actually one of the most complete, ESG driven submissions in Europe. Some people are only out to find the bad, when in fact it is a better document than anyone in Portugal has received before for a mine. There will be errors and omissions, but a very small part of a very substantial document, if it makes you stiff finding them.

People stop telling the LSE BB....email the company with your concerns and ideas maybe they might listen.