Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
In just a few years batteries will be obsolete......
Rigggghhhhttttoooo. Run along now.
Thing is EVERY trade is actually a buy and a sell! Depends which side of the market you are what is a buy or sell to you. What you look at is the 'retail' side. When you sell a MM is buying and when you buy a market maker its selling. Hence they make money on the spread even if prices don't move. This only applies mainly to AIM shares like this one. On SETs traded shares if you pay for DMA access you can be on the other side too. You could buy from a seller and sell to a buyer..... Hence why trades are not given a buy/sell note.
Aske = all
They get marked as buy or sell at time of reporting which often mis categorises them as spread could have moved since they actually took place, however in this case market had closed and no stipulation is given. Also recently I've seen large delayed trades not be assigned a direction.
do not forget the assignment of buy/sell is by the reporting site like this one and is based purely on the spread.
The exchange does NOT assign a buy or sell, just a transaction price and time. If transactions occur inside spread but happen to occur all one side of the mid point, they can aske be buys or sells reported here which is not the case.
Truth hurts.....
No!... Do one you hatter you.... ;)....
They just want a double bottom and will say anything.... Ha.
Covid, slump in EV sales, Ukraine war.... Didn't happen.... Haha.
ecograf 5 years ahead of us, not producing, BKT one of the premier projects worldwide with Tier 1 support still not producing..... Yet you think ACP only had to click their fingers or rub a lamp and the magic genie brought a mine into existence....
Another green box coming....
I will only see green boxes on this board.....
Dee, Chris donot reed so well......
By your OWN admission you believed imminent failed to be of relevance after 2 months, therefore after 2 months your decisions to hold/sell/buy became your own and solely your own and no one else is to blame but YOU.
YOU also had 559 days to think about your opinion of imminent before you would go below the price that imminent was used...... In ANYONES little head that is time enough to know imminent was certainly not happening.
No one is defending the BOD use of imminent (naively assuming things could move forward at apace) but disconnecting the idea that after 2 months then having 559 days to transact when you yourself no longer believed imminent would happen, you can't hang your decision to keep holding based on a comment made over year and half beforehand. What utter stupidity.
Cyber truck going into production.... All these new options bring instant new market buyers to EVs. Big batteries too.
Mahenge east licence areas they do not have now plus the maconde prospect area.... Those are under application by ACP subsidiary now.
Oh Steve boy..... let you into a secret, there is a buy for every sell and a sell for every buy. So say on a high buying day you complain the price doesn't go up and manipulation by MMs......well if a MM has a sell order for shares they might have more shares to SELL than the RETAIL are buying and therefore the price does not move until that MM has sold those shares into the market....which they probably negotiated a large single buy from a SELLER, which is why sometimes after all those buys not moving a large delayed sell shows (post MM moving them on). And Vice versa.
Price moving 'assistance'....I say assistance because they need retail to act to continue to move it. They drop the BID, it then needs weak hands to sell to drop further, MMs do not move BID 0.5p with no retail assistance (expect on news and liquidity point is far removed from closing price). MMs are there to 'make a market' so sometimes when it is quiet they might push a little in a certain direction looking liquidity (fake drop of BID or fake increase of ASK)....where more transactions occur (believe it or not even indices can move like this). Once you head in one direction it will get opposing trades to stop it or reverse it, i.e. increased liquidity, if you move down buyers come in, if you move up sellers come in.
Until you look beyond the retail buys and sells you will never understand how and why price moves or not. If you are just looking at L2 it is smoke and mirrors and means very little. RSP tells a far clearer picture on availability and from whom. MMs are not magicians and do not overlord price movement....they can assist and prod but ultimately retail transactions will drive the direction (unless on the MM side they have more to sell/buy than the retail are....aka supply and demand)
Caddy MMs do not move the price, demand and supply does.
MMs make money if the share price stays the same, in fact it's the easiest for them, just sit there and make spread.
I agree Seis, LSE WANT discussion of ANY type as long as it creates posts. The trollign posts are designed to create reaction by purposefully putting out untruths that need correcting etc.
I also know people that regularly breaki the the chat rules and rules that say if broken it is banable from the site and yet after being called out more than 20 times for libel they still remain on the site..... You would think LSE would like to distance themselves from the these kinds of posters because they are responsible for moderating the posts at the end of the day and it would push away casual users from participating, it seems counter intuitive, but they must like angst over decent conversation.
Time in arguments applies to everyone and the wasted emotional stress it brings. Better things to do in life....
Before the deal was done it was trolling over the deal won't be done. Now the deal is done, the deal is crappy.....yet this was never mentioned before, just now it is all that can be used by them.
Deal is done, money is paid, more money will be paid, significant money going into the ground by better miners that would never have been achievable on ARCM own...... The risk is always there in miners that nowt of commercial viability is found, thats the chance one takes (funny, tin pot mining group AA is up for spending a load to find out themselves..... must be idiots and don't know what they are doing, should have listened to the keyboard warriors on LSE) however there is significant money being spent to find that out or not, it has promising characteristics and local successes so not like plugging into unknown and unpoven localised areas. As sure as apples are apples, ANY drill cores not up to speck keyboard trolls will be on it like a rat up a drainpipe.....with told you so (yep drilling holes in the ground to find the amber nectar is not easy so hardly a revelation!).... There is 3 years to drill a lot of targets, not every core will be 10,395m of pure copper, but you never know what they will find until they have exhausted that money. It is not over on the first 10 drill cores that is for sure, albeit some people will be reaching for their tissues so they can whack one out whilst they keyboard warrior telling you the end is nigh.....
Takey,
a: what is your beef and with whom?
b: what is your goal/purpose of posting in this fashion
c: have you not got a life to get on with if ARCM isn't your thing, life is short to be spent trolling people on a social media platform. Imagine the lost time not spent with a partner or children to do this.....you will not get that time in your life again, once it's gone it's gone.
Think Fulmar is a:has spent most of their time fighting trolls that it is hard to not be and b: perhaps did not see that you only got an account last year so despite been in ARCM for years you wouldn't have been active on the board and seen China issues.