Member Info for AgentB

After +11% rise on Friday. Very nice.

Probably just part of Operation Cyber Polygon

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9961145/Are-ready-pig-pork-grown-lab.html

Well doh! An antibody test based on the spike protein is surely going to return a positive result as that’s what we’ve all been vaccinated with. If they want to push people into getting boosters by scaring them into believing that their antibodies are low, then it makes sense to focus on the N protein.

I would hope that if Al has any integrity, he would want nothing to do with this forthcoming bout of Governmental duplicity.

@13th Monkey. I admit the 40% was what I had heard anecdotally and I should not have written that post without further investigation. However, in the light of headlines such as these:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9958909/Health-Secretary-Sajid-Javid-plans-make-vaccines-condition-employment-NHS-workers.html
And
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/09/04/nhs-staffing-crisis-fears-sajid-javid-pushes-ahead-compulsory/
Doesn’t some small dormant part of your brain question why our NHS and care staff cannot be given the option of using a highly accurate lateral flow test on a daily basis to prove that they are safe to interact with patients. If not, just keep taking the blue pills.

Doctor100, here you go.
https://www.rt.com/uk/530020-zahawi-fully-vaccinated-placebo-nhs-app/

If YouTube bans it, you can tell that they don’t want you to know. https://reclaimthenet.org/youtube-censors-dr-satoshi-omura-ivermectin/

My final link was also to an ‘actual study’ published in the American Journal of Therapeutics in July 2021, and concluding that:
“Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.”

No doubt we will hear much more about it when Merck has successfully repackaged it as ‘molnupiravir‘

@13thmonkey
https://aapsonline.org/majority-of-physicians-decline-covid-shots-according-to-survey/

And the article also begs the question: “How come we never hear anything about early treatment?” Do we need to wait until Merck can re-patent ivermectin?

https://www.biznews.com/thought-leaders/2021/05/12/mailbox-ivermectin

https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Fulltext/2021/08000/Ivermectin_for_Prevention_and_Treatment_of.7.aspx

A challenge to Alastair Smith…. If you don’t speak out loud and clear THIS COMING WEEK in favour of accurate testing rather than injecting children, then you are clearly complicit in this unfolding tragedy, and I hope it weighs on your conscience. Would you let your own children take this jab? Seems that around 40% of NHS staff are refusing it.

Bent politicians, bent media and a population that’s lost all sense of proportion regarding the Covid threat.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9957311/Jabbing-12-15-year-olds-stop-classroom-disruption-school.html.

And still the sinister push to vaccinate the population goes on without it occurring to a single media outlet that accurate lateral flow tests could be equally effective in stopping classroom disruption. It’s really about time that Sir Al stepped up to the plate and educated the media on how this could happen - not to mention ending border jams at Heathrow etc.

Injecting children, pregnant women and women of childbearing age with this experimental biological agent is a crime against humanity. Look at Israel. It simply doesn’t work! So why oh why is the world so hell bent on pursuing this policy?

If he’s been in dialogue with Musk, the third language must be reptilian, surely! :-)

I would like to know why I ended up spending over £140 as a legal requirement for entry into the U.K. from France because lateral flow tests are not considered ‘adequate’. Whereas….

https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2021-08-18/hl2329

Note that the RNS a has her as CSO - Therapeutics Division. So two CSOs then? Doesn’t this also perhaps argue for a sell off of Diagnostics?

Personally, I’ll be going for the Veuve Cliquot and black pudding option.

Ha ha ha, Ian don’t forget that when the real biggie RNS lands, I’m going to sneak up on you and join you for brekkie with a bottle of Champers. Please warn them to get one ready. Could be soon! ;-)

*n*

Many thanks Ophidia. Makes perfect sense and hopefully a number of perfect cancer cures.

I wanted to bump this to see if anyone (scientist or lawyer) can answer Pedro’s (very pertinent) question. How easy is it to re-patent a drug originally patented by another company?