RE: Timelines8 Sep 2021 14:57
Suspect they are waiting to figure out which test will increase take-up of booster/first jab for children and encourage people to submit to vaccine/antibody passport idea. (After all, that is the ONLY agenda here.)
- Highly accurate antigen test (Avacta) doesn't fit the bill because it provides an opt out from the jab. (If I can prove that I'm not contageous, why can't I enter nightclubs, pubs, aeroplanes?) It would also cut the number of cases considerably as it only picks up the contagious - unlike PCR testing which can still be positive months after infection due to Gov running it at too high an amplification cycle. (40 instead of 27) The very existence of an accurate antigen test is being hushed up by the media (and it would appear with the connivance of Avacta's own PR company.
- PCR testing is still preferred by Gov, as it can be manipulated to show ever higher number of cases (mainly false positives), thereby creating fear. It's also very expensive, thus helping to achieve the climate agenda by putting people off flying.
- I can certainly see a use for a sovereign antibody test as part of the agenda, but the Gov would likely want that also to be lab based rather than home use.
Rather worryingly, there was a Bidstats tender document publicised recently which called for a test based on the N protein rather than the Spike which all current antibody tests are targeting. Needless to say, given that the vaccine is based on the S protein, nobody will have antibodies to N except those with natural immunity. Such a device could therefore be used to convince people that their immunity is non-existent and they really need that extra jab.