Member Info for AgArCu

Not been on for a while- was filling my brain with nonsense so took a break.

I have a separate question? Do those who were steadfast in their belief that a bid was imminent earlier in the year now accept that it won't be any time soon, and we will most-likely see out 2023 as Solg? Also, quick flick back shows me rampers we're frothing over the FTA between Ecuador and China... Is solg selling a lot of fruit and vegetables?! Classic rampers' reason to explain away the lack of action. "If you just wait a few more days/weeks/months until X, the reward will be massive"

Going flying now there's a break in the weather, but for those hoping RedKnight will do us all a favour soon, I'll quote this from yesterday's ramping... it has not aged well!

"SOLG up 7.5%...must be something going on..."

How does he explain that we're back where we were at open yesterday? Presumably that's not 'something going on'? That must be the dreaded 'Algos'. It's only worth drawing everyone's attention to a small percentage change if it's positive, right.

This joker is so dull. Maybe he's a badly programmed chatbot, but one from a few years ago, before they got the intelligence' part of AI...

Won't clutter the board today as got accused of that yesterday. Just one prediction: fort will either ignore this message, pretend he has filtered me or give a quick but inaccurate response in hopes of covering up how stupid what he just said is. Classic ramper.

This should be good...!

Fort: please explain the mechanism by which blackrock move solg shares from one fund to another. Go for it. Google the bits you need to. I know you must understand it better than me, otherwise you wouldn't have suggested it was contributing to the low sp. Because that's the actions of a shameless, brainless ramper, and you're not one of those...

Go on, explain it to the good people. No one here knows better than you...

In that case go with the 5% SM, wouldn't want to embarrass yourself.

My recommends yesterday go to show I'm far from the only one who wishes Redknight and his bunch of brainless twerps would do one. They have almost completely swapped this board. And yet rather than listen and FO, he filters and continues to post flawed stuff from L2, which (and this is the biggest giveaway he has never worked in business, trading or finance) he seems to believe is static. It should be criminal, or easy to delete, but such is the world of anonymous message boards.

Don't worry dream, you won't understand why mindless ramping is annoying.

Is solg up 7.5%? Or is red just ramping? Seriously, someone shut this joker up. Thousands of posts and almost all of them dogsh** like this.

It isn't news today, just as it wasn't news the last 100 times he said the same boring thing.

Ah, and today it suited the same people who red accuses of subduing the share price to have it rise 8%? But tomorrow it will suit them to walk it down again? Gotcha. Makes perfect sense. No contradictions to see here, folks.... Move it along now...

Red has read something saying we're up for sale. How exciting! And definitely not an unsubstantiated ramp!

Apparently I've joined the long list of people he has 'blocked' (but still communicates with it the flatter him ;) ) Would someone be so good as to call him out on this latest nonsense? He's preempting the SR he doesn't believe is happening (absolute joker)

Can you see the similarities to what you just posted? Yes, mine took me 2 mins to come up with, but everything you've written there is irrelevant and, by association, rampy. Shouldn't have wasted your time copying links.

And when HH says something correct, we can talk about him again, otherwise he will just keep jumping up at Irwin, trying to get a response to validate his inaccurate ramblings. Remember all the immovable deadlines he talked about that we sailed through without news? There's your proof.

Please, Red, explain how these algo Boogeymen are taking our so down?! I'm waiting...

Also, the beloved HH of Twitter is not the genius some though. People mistook his evident poor grasp of English as technical jargon. Most of what his said was meaningless waffle. And now he just sends mostly unanswered tweets to Irwin. Embarrassing! He even tried to tell Irwin about 'the face to face' in HK. Muppet!

You are yet to put forward one well reasoned argument. You misinterpret and then misrepresent almost everything you read. You have thrown a hell of a lot of s*** across your thousands of boring posts (I elected to sample the tripe, rather than eat the whole dish...), but little has stuck, so to speak.

And 'engage brain', please: even you must have realised the rubbish about Hong Kong was satire. Of you. And your rampy nonsense. Please, tell me you got that? Wow. Thicker than I thought!

What a strange question, Bubble. I know about as much about solg as the rest of the clueless hopefuls here. But I don't try to twist every piece of information I read, even the demonstrably bad stuff, into some fairytale about it being good for PIs and 'just what we need'. I don't believe an sp at 13 is better than one at 30p, for example. And I do know you're just a hype man for Red

Fort, have you explained your post yet where you said "We shareholders can't be expected to keep carrying the can for the future owners."? It sounded a bit like a winge. Are you expecting majors to take pity on solg shareholders? Until they decide to bid, if they do, we are in charge of our portfolio, costs and all. We're not doing it 'for' anyone else.

Red, this is consistently your most blatant BS. Your misunderstanding of market forces is one thing, but I have seen loads of posters explain 'Algo' (lol) trades to you before. If you've anything between the ears, you have understood each of these simplified explanations, and yet you still trot out this rubbish about a Boogeyman that destroys our otherwise imperious march towards a massive market cap... Meaning your either doing it for a reaction or you feel it is in your interests to convince the uninformed readers of a small internet message board that there are evil forces driving down their investment.

To every sane poster here, how do we stop this nonsense? He's tireless in his ramping, his lying (see ever expanding CV!), his sob stories and his fictitious trades. When be isn't telling us about tiny volume trades reported on Christmas day in canada (personal low point hey, Red?!)

Surely these things are enough to get him banned? And no, I won't filter him- it isn't right that someone gets to put as much misinformation as him here. His thousands of repetitive, irritating posts need to stop.

"We shareholders can't be expected to keep carrying the can for the future owners"

Not sure majors with deep enough pockets got there by taking pity on PIs... Sorry Fort, but we won't threaten, antagonize or bully our way into a TO bid. Majors will wait until it suits them. And Chinese companies aren't famed for altruistic deals, either...

Sorry Fort, you said 'Much depends on Newmont/NCM deal' and I read that as you saying 'much depends on Newmont/NCM deal', but now you say 'I don't think much depends on the NCM/NM deal.' I think this might be the source of confusion.

Takeover this year though, right? You've been certain of that previously and it's only late Feb.

Fort, if you think much depends on the NCM/NM deal, when do you see a bid for solg arriving? Still this year, I assume?

I think calling it a 'thought' is generous. No thinking went on there.

Culturally not on their doorstep at all. Are you suggesting that the Biden administration would seek to politically frustrate a private TO bid from a foreign pseudo state-owned company in a third party foreign jurisdictions? I realise you want to hype this, bubble, but even by the standards of this board that is ridiculous.

Just engage brain a second- how would 'the Yanks' prevent a Chinese lead takeover of Solgold or purchase of Cascabel?