Member Info for AgArCu

Suspect the website is a lot of nothing (just my hunch). They will update the staffing on there, and bring it up to date (current one looks tired). You don't plan the release of news around a new website, nor design a new website to deliver news that has to go out via RNS. So, if there is no RNS, this is a nothing to get excited about. Just vines for the rampers to swing between as they Tarzan their way through the forest of no actual news, making lots of noise and then hoping each of their false dawns is forgotten about in the mass quantity of rubbish they put out. Hey fort?

I predict that when there is no RNS and Thursday is as boring as expected, fort will claim this as cast iron evidence that a TO is imminent (!)

Rampers gonna ramp.

Are you capable of making up your own mind, though, because no amount of days passing without a TO offer seems to open your eyes l?

Slug, I'm not NaL. But 2 posts in you are already rumbled. Let me just check if Jiangxi are invested in solg or ensa.. ah, got it. It's solg.

WI has missed that this is only Jiangxi re-establishing 6%. It's not an increased percentage holding compared to their original investment (0.268% down on original).

And I wouldn't hold my breath if Warren says something will be interesting: we must be on point 2.99)b)ii) section 4 appendix f of his 'bob will go fast and smart, 3 part plan' rhetoric!!

How long will slug stay this time?

Depends if he's drinking tonight. Can't handle a sherbet, and will get himself banned.

So fort did try googling Ecuador, but when he saw reports of the protests on 13th he decided to post a totally different random news article instead. Figures... #notthesharpesttool

Prediction: absolutely nothing new. Brushes aside data room Qs to the point you still don't know if anyone has actually done any DD beyond those already invested. Lots of flannel about streamlining and optimisation. Vague reassurances about solg being popular with whoever ends up in power. Repeated commitments to do more of this sort of thing, even though it will prove itself to be an exercise in spin, not substance. And then lay some groundwork to get votes in Dec by joking about how many shares he has tried to buy. This is what any of us would have to do in his position, and anyone with any experience here knows this.

No need to jump on this and accuse me of negativity - it's my honest opinion. And you won't have to wait long to see if I'm right. If you disagree, come join me in nailing your colours to the mast: tell us what you're expecting, and if you're right we'll all be impressed.

Beg your pardon, Iseo? Was that a comeback in behalf of Rampy Red, or do you just like to troll people?

I have never got confused about whether western stock exchanges trade on Christmas day. Not even once. Have you? Or is it just red?

We're talking about a man who was working so hard to boost this share he once forgot it was Christmas day and posted excitedly about a trade reported on tsx. It was astonishingly stupid (unless you've read his other posts, in which case it was borderline predictable)

Pad, how wide is this cusp? According to some we've been on the cusp for 5+ years... When is a cusp actually a plateau?

Beware rampers like this. They try to trick small PIs into buying into a rise. They then explain away drops as poor liquidity or blame spurious factors that were actually foreseen. What they don't do is provide tangible reasons for their extreme positivity (because those reasons don't exist, or are paper thin and easily discredited). DYOR, expect this to go down as well as up, and definitely don't believe the nonsense about an imminent bid- it's been 'imminent' for years, and will remain 'imminent' for a long while to come.

Red the make-believer is back with force.

How's the 1Y comparison, Red? Down 46%? Love how you cherry pick your percentages every time you take over this board. Is it 30 or 40 million shares you've got at the moment? We lose track...

Has red bought his 30m shares back, or why has he suddenly started ramping so hard this morning? We've had a nice break from all the forced inuendo and 'dot dot dot'.

Clown will now claim someone else's trades as his own (or his wife's), will pepper this board with nonsense he claims means a sale is inevitable (same guy who has been doing this for several years) and then, when someone points out he's a clueless ramper, he will try and invoke sympathy by making up a new disease to suffer from.

Tale as old as time.

Funny how it's always a few months away, isn't it. Remember when the TO was going to happen as soon as the stand still ended?

Don't worry about seeming daft though: just wait a few months and claim the TO is only a few months and a couple of hurdles away

Meanwhile, in the real world...!

Two things, Red

1) chatter on a tiny message board doesn't change the SP. Bad management does.

2) you are quoting DG1 about the data room parties. Not confirmed by the company, so I'd use some seasoning here.

Once again, I know you are desperate for a sale, but it is more likely a major would partner with us than buy us. Offer to put up most of the cash for building the mine in exchange for most of the minerals extracted. Then cost solg out of the equation over next few years with increased spending demands we can't meet, so they get a cheap route to 100% of the concession.

Not what anyone here wants, but more likely than a cashed up buyer offering £1.5+bn for the lot out of the goodness of their hearts, which is what some seem to believe might happen (lol).

Does a JV dilute us by increasing the number of shares, add, or are you referring to the fact we'll be in line for less income from mining cascabel? Because 20% of billions is worth more than 100% of FA, last time I checked...

Maybe SM is genuine in their concerns, fort? Not every poster here shares your belief that they can alter the SP by posting unsubstantiated rubbish (!). Some post their actual thoughts, neither ramping not trashing. Don't expect you to understand.

Add, there isn't really a lack of clarity RE: sale or mining. When has Scott ever said we are for sale? Rampers here got excited about WI, Bob et al. but you must not listen to idiots like fort and red. DYOR add. Basic stuff.

You still can't see that WI isn't the oracle, can you? We were on point 2.99 of his 3 point plan to sell solg, now we're mining in hopes of "lighting things up". The man is no more clued in them some of the other rampers on here- he just shifts his narrative most weeks. Classic billy big balls stuff, but easy to do when you're as cashed up as he is.

RE: not just coming out and saying we are going for Tandy or similar. Shareholders aren't the priority for the moment- leave that to the month before the AGM when the hyperbole hits. For now it's about matching what we say to the incoming political landscape. Don't release an SR that then contradicts the direction of new government. See if they want huge, big ticket mining or smaller, less headline grabbing projects, then adjust wording accordingly.

'not mine builders'. At this time we are an explorer. We can't sit around forever waiting for a TO that might not come (far cheaper for majors to have us burn through cash and fail government spending agreement, then pick up the repo concession. Don't believe the deficit deadline nonsense peddled by ramper fort- majors have other options medium term ). So we have to do something, which means re-evaluating the engineering and bringing in some mine builders (engineers) to pick off the easiest fruit. Pretty sure lots of others have tried to explain this simple logic to you fantasists multiple times before - does it take your golden boy on Twitter reiterating it for you to finally understand? Seems so. Nice if reality starts to set in for some of you though.

Just re-read add's post and can't make head nor tail of it. Who is this 'client'? I assumed he was accusing my little story about an HK hotel of moving the SP (not likely!!) not sure what the rest of his BS is.

Anyway, nice of him to offer to be quiet. To be clear- I've never bought shares in behalf of anyone else, nor have I claimed to. Weird guy.