Member Info for AgArCu

Have a guess, jez! Its all people who still fill this board with the same kind of rampy nonsense. Everyone so far has posted in the last 24hrs, often many years after their ridiculous statements of confidence.

From this to posting links to his tweets and using his words as proof of an imminent bid:

"WI hmmmm I know the I stands for Irwin , the W has several possibilities...."

It's too delicious, this stuff. Better waiting room material than the old Grand Designs magazines.

"the plan is still to finance Alpala independently...massive interest from the East Coast of the US..."

Another corker, from a ramper who puts in a shift despite their advanced years and alleged ill health...

Anyone want to play a game? It's called "who said this and when?". Just name the poster and the month+year. No Google cheating, it's just for fun. Can easily get some from each of the rampers- just pick a random page in their posting history and there's plenty to choose from. I'll start with this one from a clearly well-informed and rational poster:

"Expect a gradual appreciation over the coming years"

So we'll have an exploitation license in place by 20th August (7 weeks)? And if we don't? Would be happy to see it but absolutely not likely.

Of course they can, Quady. We'll use that same source of low-cost money you're getting the £3b capex from.

Are you lot reading the article?!

"They would finance the generation plant and we would operate it."

We can't finance an open cut mine, let alone a complex block cave or a pricey hydroelectric plant. Let's walk before we can run and find a way to get some metals out of the ground before we sign up to build Ecuador's other infrastructure projects. If Solaris are in a position to fund big energy production, lucky them. We have had to sack a load of staff just to keep the lights on for a drill-free year.

Bang on the money, bozi. A bozi bullseye. No chance at all of BHP paying over the odds for solg and then stumping up for mine development on top of that. Shareholders wouldn't go for it. Fort will come in with "£3b is cheap for a tier one asset" but once again I'll caution that we own shares in solg, not the minerals in the ground, and a TO bid will only be up to the value attributed to our company.

How soon is soon, Pad? Put a date on it or it's just meaningless ramping statements. You must have an opinion on the when- why else would you be sat in this share waiting for years like me? Do you agree with dg1 that it's before Christmas. Or end of H1 next year? Or 2025? Go on- be brave and then hope you're not wrong.

For balance, the majors you speak of have had months of this new, cheaper level to increase their holding and decrease the price they would have to pay if they fancied a TO. They haven't, so I think we can conclude that NCM and BHP are not thinking about solg much anymore. BHP have their own exploration office in Ecuador, but haven't increased staffing their since inception. Jiangxi have almost returned to their pre-dilution percentage (not quite) but seem to have ended their buying, and the other two haven't topped back up to 13%, seemingly happy at 10%.

"Tier 1 asset!" is the fall back of most of you guys. I wouldn't be here if I didn't rate the minerals in the ground, but remember that we're invested in a company that has bought the rights to explore, assess, develop and fund the construction of a mine. So far, we're only two stages in, and our exploration licence at Alpala is time limited. Our currently leadership have been bullish in their substance-light comms, but they're going to have to get down to some serious business if they expect the government to sign exploitation licenses with them and not someone else.

The good thing about having a short memory and a rampy heart (hi dbw 👋) is that you can forget all about posting that 16p was the bottom when the sentiment changes, and just spout about topping up at 13p! Must be nice to be that much of a simpleton

*did care

Minor correction to Fort's ramp

Since your little snark earlier, we're all out with a 91 run deficit. Mercifully I don't actually believe I'm jinxing things, but my point remains.

Sorry to anyone saving today's action for the highlights. It'll be a quick rundown of the England tailenders....

Why would NaL, who either is or pretends to be Australian (and can't spell, by the looks of it, but that's academic) want to avoid jinxing the England team, which is what I was accusing you of? Are you a bit simple, Pad, or are the accusations of day-drinking levelled here accurate?

Come on Pad- I like cricket, and we all know what happens when you make a prediction. You've ruined it now.

Hi pad. Be a bit brave and do some name checking, no one on here will mind. When you mumble to the crowd like that you seem petty. I've been away for a couple of days, but I'm still not on anyone's payroll and I'm still not posting under multiple names. I'm sorry if this undermines your argument, but please don't get upset.

Posters pointing out that there isn't currently any good news coming out of solg aren't being paid to drive down the price (if they were, this BB would be an odd choice of apparatus). Instead, they are mostly investors unimpressed by the continued slide to 16p under a new management structure that hasn't managed any coherent messaging or direction. They are troubled by the use of 'booster' rhetoric and 'wait and see' comms, when it's clear solg is struggling in a cul de sac.

Awaiting a charitable takeover has never and will never be a good business plan. If the SR makes reasonable suggestions around de-risking cascabel and monetizing our numerous concessions, people will change their tune. If it continues to be delayed and then yields little in the way of new ideas, frustrations will continue. Do you understand?

Captain ellipsis is back, I see...

I wonder, if you asked the NCM board to list their top 50 most important investments of the last few years, whether solg would be a 'pointless' answer. I suspect it would be close.

Conclusion: Newmont won't do anything with the shake, besides potentially forget they own it. But nice to see red getting all frothy again 😂

Absolutely. We've seen your earlier comment was unsubstantiated, as I expected. We're done 👍

Sean, will you explain your comment earlier about today's RNS meaning we are now parcelled up for a sale? How does this make us more attractive than yesterday? I know you're not one of those informed posters you speak of, but you do post a lot, so let's at least see if any of it has substance, yeah. So: the floor is yours.

Sean, do you think today's RNS is us being 'packaged up'? How do you feel this makes solg more appealing to a buyer than we were, say, yesterday?

The Shares will be allotted and issued from time to time to satisfy the exercise of options over Ordinary Shares, which were exchanged, in connection with the acquisition of Cornerstone Capital Resources Inc. (Cornerstone), for options granted by Cornerstone over its ordinary shares to certain of its directors, employees and consultants.

How many options had cornerstone promised and to whom- anyone got the list? Assume they will be exercised at the same conversion as before. Will this number of shares cover these options, or will we be doing more printing?