Member Info for Aether

PMJH

"Arguably the most important words to have been shared on this board in a while. IMO “excited to commence” indicates they have gotten over the necessary hurdles."

No, it doesn't.

The email also states:

"In addition, they are working on establishing an associated financing plan."

There is, so far, no evidence to suggest that they have established the necessary financing.

How much is the IP worth?

How long before the LSE intervenes directly?

Where has the money gone?

Has the money gone?

Have they decided to be very cautious and not spend available money in case the two clinical trials fail and instead are attempting to persuade BP to pay for a smaller single trial?

Are you trading this stock, Ftm?

Your £500,000 is blocking the u-bend.

The LSE regulators will need to be satisfied soon.

PMJH - At some stage, the regulators will intervene.

How many shares do you have, MrCosts?

So that we can gather together the requisite number for an EGM.

Doc83 - With MrCosts £500,000 your combined total should almost be enough to call an EGM.

PMJH - Again, what if there isn't one?

What if there isn't one?

"I doubt whether any contributor to an investment forum would have made that link intentionally?"

The behaviour of some posters over the past two years suggests otherwise.

For example:

So far, we've had one member involved in a court case against another that was dropped when the nature of their private emails was revealed to their lawyers.

Threats against RM's daughter.

Threats against a poster's family members, contacting their workplace with false accusations and active stalking online and at their family home.

Also, mocking someone whose parent had just journeyed to another place.

Several posters have, over the course of two years and using multiple accounts, mocked investors who, in some cases, have lost a large part of their retirement portfolio and were, no doubt, emotionally vulnerable. They knew this.

There have been genuinely disturbed and evil people attracted to this forum.

Doc.Dan what do you think is their agenda? It's wild behaviour.

Well said, MrCosts.

XD

Maybe Fruits is the hero of this story.

In contrast, there are several other posters that repeatedly post the same negative narrative about the company often at the same time and either claim not to own shares or own a ludicrous amount (and get caught lying by boasting on another forum of their manipulation of this forum to trade).

Some of these are traders, some are obviously ill, but others I'm not so sure.

Maybe something is going on in the background.

Spacman's original post doesn't mention "trading" only that there seems to be an attempt to control/contain/suppress the narrative by Tommy-Fruits-Gunto.

Interestingly, in response, Fruits repeatedly chooses to address "trading" manipulation rather than the actual accusation that he is attempting to control/contain/suppress the narrative for the company.

At some stage the LSE will have to intervene.

The LSE will have to intervene at some stage.