Member Info for Adw198

Wow, it’s 0.90p to BUY is it.

If that’s true…Ouch!

“Added another tranche at close”

Interesting, given there didn’t appear to be any buys.

Agreed - which means not all of the withheld 30% is coming to us.

Oh dear Proquo has reacted with typical and predictable class to being fact checked.

Lovely!

Or perhaps I should contact the FCA?! :)

I said the big buys last Friday were promising (because I’m fair minded and objective). Today’s action does NOT bode well with an RNS overdue.

As it happens, no he don’t Doc, but he said twice and called it a fact so it must be true. Just like when he told us categorically there wouldn’t be a raise. :)

This is all a fun distraction, but I’m here to talk about the company thanks lads.

Feel free to let me know the profit this month.

I’m not getting dragged into corrected your lies Abzzba.

Stick to the company shall we. Do we agree it’s a fact we’re a profitable company as Proquo claimed?

Do you not think the apparent reduction in equipment at H2 is a negative sign? Because when there was seemingly more you (and I) said it was a positive.

Do you still stand by your “conservative” prediction of $100 oil?

Do you still think it’ll be 5p by last June?

Do you still think PC will amend and sign their own contract in November 25, volunteering to then pay on time going forward and paying a 7figure debt in one go.

Lots to talk about but don’t forget to turn off Google translate this time mate.

Nobody what anyone else holds or who they are. I know for a fact I held last October / November when I was accused of not holding because I was intelligent enough to see through the ramping.

Either way tho, play the ball and not the man.

“Tt1981 ; those who hold shares are entitled to share opinions and info about the company etc.”

As are those who used to hold, might hold now or never held. I appreciate that’s not the way you want to world to work, but it’s how it does work.

Proquo back on the cut and paste spamming

“company turning a good profit” isn’t a FACT. But feel free to tell us how much profit it’s making - you’ll need figures on income and expenditure.

“I cant read charts”

Don’t worry Kev, you’re not the only one. :)

Investor telling someone who just put a £1k into MATD they’d be better putting their money elsewhere. Incredible misplaced confidence. :)

@doc

“And Louise must be laughing into her cornflakes at hypocrite Investor33's whining.”

Brilliant isn’t it. There have been the same number of references to my daughter and how I treat her as there have buys today.

I’m particularly excited to hear what LSE say when Investors says he got an email he didn’t want after breaking their rules and posting his email address.

Also funny how Louise and Craig are described as the owners of the site. :)

Nobody spoke about the special purpose designation being a risk or issue before it was awarded.

If anyone had queried im sure they’d have been roundly attacked by the usual suspects.

I’m getting the police has quickly been diluted to I couldn’t care less what he says, presumably because even David realised he’s talking rubbish.

I wouldn’t worry too much about what Investor thinks of your trading, Kevin. He’s had £20k tied up here for 6/7 years and wishes he’d never heard of MATD, yet feel equipped to lecture here on charts and fundamentals.

Chill out Abzzba. You think this is going to 30bag don’t you so stop whining and get buying. This time tell us in advance of the print

“Or it could mean H2 is now flowing oil and the extra equipment is no longer needed, take a look at H1 and Gazelle, very little equipment at these producing wells.”

It could, I’ve not claimed to be an expert. Nor have I accused people of faking images. I’ve just a view that the lack of comparable infrastructure to me implies it’s not producing.

Kev, I also initially thought it was positive and said the same. However, Dans tweet suggested the most recent picture contained less infrastructure. To me that suggests they’ve tried and failed and put the equipment away. Not my image so happy to be corrected, but the fact it was ignored implies my concerns are valid.

To discuss the company. You?