Member Info for addicknt

Q, I think he's referring to the post on X from Dan, which shows Canaccord's prediction of how the NAV grows as we pass various milestones. A link was posted here by someone a few days ago.

We have a new corporate logo! How exciting.

And then there's the French...The true world leaders in social protests.

For those of you who look at LinkedIn there was a very interesting piece on there the other day written by a guy called Mario Vetro. It concerns BHP and their plans for copper.

It's well worth a read.

Pbow, I sent you a message earlier explaining my reasons.

Nal, prior, during and after my call there were various email exchanges which JS has seen. They confirm without equivocation that the discussions took place.

I ask you again, please provide your evidence that they didn't.

Nal, wrong again. My exchange with the chairman was verified by JerrySpaniel on this board.

If there was such a thing as the Museum of Stupid, you'd be the star exhibit.

Nal, yes, I remember ever one of those points for the simple reason they're the truth. Let me know when you've found any evidence to support your allegation that they're lies.

Final point: I have never spoken to any of our ceos, nor have I claimed to. I did speak at length to our new chairman and reproduced the bullet points of the conversation for the interest of fellow sensible posters. Again, if you have proof I didn't, please produce it, although I should point out that my various exchanges were verified by another member of this board, who saw the evidence.

Nal, I didn't 'threaten legal proceedings'. I simply pointed out that if you make allegations against someone you need to provide the evidence to prove the allegations, which is something you have never done. This is a statement of fact.

As far as I can recall, the only person who has consulted a solicitor is MF with regard to Quady.

If only you could read and comprehend what posters actually say you'd find life so much easier.

Shows why we'll be taken out during the construction phase.

Have a look at Dan's latest post. It'll cheer you up for the weekend.

Pbow, the only place I've ever worked where the word deadline actually meant deadline was the City. So I tend not to take the word too seriously when I see it applied anywhere else, and particularly not in the circumstances we find here. And the fact is he only missed them by a matter of days, so for me it's pretty irrelevant. But I understand your point.

As far as Wigan is concerned, you'll have a Reform MP next time round, so your vote won't be wasted.

p.s all of us have misspelt the word 'complementary'. I blame spellcheck.

Pbow, I think you can add confidence to your list. It's apparent that people are impressed by DV and believe he's the right person to take this forward. He's demonstrated dynamism, determination and direction, and investors like what they've heard.

So it's AI versus what the company actually says. (for those of you who can be bothered - page 13 of the latest presentation)

Panda, look at page 13 of the latest presentation. It defines it as the Complimentary Investment Protection Agreement. Perhaps a slip of the tongue by DV?

Rich, have a look at his posting history, you'll spot a pattern.

Panda, I enjoyed your post. I hope DV does see it - I'm sure he'll immediately unblock you.

Dan and Paul are far more adept at using social media than previous incumbents, and it makes a difference. Linkedin appears to be their favourite, but they've obviously encouraged the people in Ecuador to use Facebook far more regularly. I enjoy seeing the smiling faces as they go about their daily routine of growing coca plants, or whatever it is they grow. An intoxicated workforce is a happy workforce...as no one has ever said.

He was accusing you and I of being the same person.

Pbow, but apparently I'm you. Have I started talking to myself?

Typical of you not to understand the point.

Provide the evidence to support your accusations or stfu.