Member Info for addicknt

Fort with regard to your second point, I assume his confidence that it will start in November is based upon the agreement of Franco.

Clearly, we're working closely with them and I suspect he won't say anything unless we have their support.

Let's hope he can get the CIPA across the line. Once it's signed the whole project becomes a significantly more attractive proposition for institutional and trade investors.

But have you noticed the absence of a certain poster this week?

I'm led to believe he's either serving a temporary sin-binning, or has been permanently consigned to the history books.

Perhaps you should tell PS and DV that. I'm sure they'd appreciate your input. Whilst you're at it, ask them about Cannaccord, you may be surprised by the answer.

Rcgl, Sangha's influence has been diluted significantly. The skills and contacts he offered are no longer as important because both PS and DV offer the same thing. Having said that I'm sure he supported their appointment and no doubt he's regularly consulted. However, this is Dan's show now and I reckon he's ploughing his own furrow with the full support of the Board.

A solid start to the day as we creep over 19p.

DBW, I have my reasons for doubting that Cannaccord are responsible and most certainly don't buy into Panda's claims.

Having said that, I'm deeply suspicious of recent trading and I know that view is shared elsewhere.

Q, agreed, it isn't them.

How do you know it was them?

This is not directly related to yesterday's second RNS, but refers to the options RNS a couple of weeks ago.

At the time there was speculation about who exercised them and at what price. I don't know who it was, but the price was 1m @ 6.6p and 666k @ 10.3p. This was revealed in a filing with Companies House on the 10th.

First thing this morning after we'd dropped from being 5% up to 3%, I assumed we'd experience yet another insipid reaction to positive news. What a pleasant surprise to close 19% up.

Can we have a bit more of that, please.

You've got that right, Fort. Dan mentions the disparity regularly and I'm sure he's very frustrated at the market valuation.

P.s, he's posted another message on LinkedIn which is worth reading.

Only a few weeks to wait for the next results from holes 71-74, which are showing 'visual indications of strong mineralization'.

It's interesting to note how Tandy has gone from being a bit of a side-show to become the cornerstone of the overall plan.

Tandy results out. Described as 'robust' by DV who sounds very upbeat about the deposit.

Thanks for that, covgaz. Mind you, you're not exactly squeaky clean when it comes to abusing people, are you?

Eloro, bear in mind you're dealing with someone who doesn't know the difference between the words during and after. Someone who pretends to know what people have done with their lives; who seemingly doesn't believe people do actually go abroad to work and most amusingly, supports the one person on here who, for whatever weird reason, has made it his ambition to talk this company down. He's one screwed up individual who has a real problem distinguishing between his arse and elbow.

Nal, final post on this matter.

Think about who posted it. This bloke has been peddling crap for as long as he's been a member here, and bear in mind he's had at least three identities under which he's posted some truly epic BS. His intention in that post was crystal clear and everyone but you knew it.

He's not a shareholder and is deliberately working against those who are, which includes you. So god knows why you'd support the bloke.

SH, you're right, nuance does matter, particularly when you're posts are involved; although in your case we can interpret nuance as meaning lie.

Everyone knows your agenda, and your intentions are crystal clear. And who can forget your admission a couple of months ago that everything you post is a lie? Sure, you may have thought you were being ironic, but amusingly you've never said a truer word.

Nal, the reason my post attracted 9 recommendations is that people have a memory, which you clearly don't.

Nal, his post was on the 5th at 20:07 and was a reference to the revocation of DPM's environmental licence.

If you weren't such an idle idiot you could find it for yourself. Btw, I think you'll find quite a few people saw the post i.e everyone who reads this bb apart from you.

Nal, I suggest you check SH's posting history. I'll accept your apology.