Member Info for addicknt

Ha! Not quite sure why I transposed the words, although I did have a hangover this morning!

The video DV refers to is an interview by MinesofMoney on YouTube. It's really worth listening to.

Damers, he's been close to McMullen and I would guess he's been influenced by his approach, which has been described as treating mining investments in the same way as a private equity investor operates i.e exit driven.

Was talking about Mick McMullan, which included a reference to his mantra of "IRR before ego" and "exit before empire". I liked that one.

DV commented on a post which w

Oh dear Q. Young has done more to protect free speech in this country than anyone and explains why the FSU keeps winning in the courts. Perhaps this is what upsets you?

It most certainly is not. You need to look at the quality and credentials of its contributors.

You must be watching a different BBC. They NEVER present both sides of the argument. Read the 19 page report written by Prescott, published in today's Telegraph, about BBC bias. It's shocking.

Q, one last thing. Have a read of today's Daily Sceptic and look at the article titled 50 lies the BBC have told about climate change. It may well give you an aneurysm.

Gates has effectively adopted the position Lovelock adopted towards the end of his life, albeit it's taken him some time.

Anyway, that's enough climate balls from me, although I will say I find the COP summit nauseating.

Q, no disrespect but the quotes are from his own website and they are his words.

Q, a direct quote from Gates:

"A domesday view in which cataclysmic climate change will decimate civilization was fortunately wrong". " It will not lead to humanities demise".

Q, what do you make of Gates volte face? Is he wrong?

Monte, yes, the new tax has happened.

Magoo, how do you know he isn't doing anything? The fact he's pulled out of a few conferences is hardly evidence of inactivity. Is it possible he's in the middle of something significant and can't afford to take time out to repeat the same story to the same people?

One of their stated objectives was to encourage more institutional investors onto the Register and the recent evidence suggests he may have had some success, and this involves a great deal of promotion. (mind you, if I were an ii I wouldn't invest until the CIPA's in place and there's more clarity on this bloody levy issue)

Thanks, Jerry. I was wondering if someone had done a hatchet job in the same way that hedge fund did on us a few years back.

Jerry, I don't use X - what was he saying about their PFS?

PS, re: your point about penny shares. A couple of weeks ago I tried to point this out to the poor old boy, but I'm afraid it's way beyond his intellectual capabilities.

Nal, I know you find rational discussion almost impossible, but I wasn't 'promoting' AI, I simply said someone had posted something on Telegram using AI and it was interesting. No more, no less.

Incidentally, your post of yesterday made me laugh. You admitted you have no evidence to support any of your defamatory allegations and yet in the final sentence stated; 'guilty as charged, m'lord'. Do you understand how these things work? No evidence, no case.

Someone on Telegram has used AI to provide a side-by-side analysis of our pfs compared to that of Solaris. It makes for very interesting reading.