Member Info for addicknt

Fort, indeed there is and tomorrow's the 21st. Notice given tomorrow means 21 days is the 11th, does it not?

I wonder if there'll be any Special Resolutions this year? Having successfully achieved the disapplication of pre-emption rights last year, I can't think of much else, or does that issue have to be voted on yearly?

DBW, the requirement for a UK listed company is 21 days, which in my book is tomorrow.

Due tomorrow.

That was the UT.

Fort, I also recall him saying that and being slightly surprised as it seemed to be a case of cart before horse.

Q, the importance of the CIPA isn't about the price movement on the day it's announced, it's about the long term investability of the project. I would expect the market to react favourably when the RNS appears, but who knows?

You suggest the CIPA formalises what we already have, and yes, I'm sure there'll be many overlapping features (in fact, as the title suggests, it's complementary to the existing agreement), however, the quantum of protection offered will be significantly larger and it's this feature which transforms the whole shooting match for anyone who wishes to either invest via the market, a placing, a debt facility, a direct investment in ENSA, or a purchase.

Pbow, yep, the risk profile is reduced dramatically which opens many more doors. Critically, for potential buyers we become a far more attractive target.

Let's hope the year end prediction is accurate.

Q, it will make us more attractive for institutions and potential trade investors/ buyers. Retail buyers will also have more confidence.

Medi, the impact will be significant. The CIPA will make the company a far more investible proposition.

Friday is the deadline for the AGM Notice. Every board likes to get good news out there prior to an AGM, so can we expect anything, either by Friday or during the Notice period?

To my mind, the CIPA is the most important item on the agenda at the moment and we know the company has told us it will be signed by year end. But given the levy issue, is this a realistic expectation? Has the government been satisfied by the payments we've made already, or are they using the CIPA as a bargaining tool?

I sincerely hope there's a live video link and shareholders are given the opportunity to ask questions. Last year's effort was a disgrace.

Rich, of course you're right and nowadays I ignore 90% of his insane ramblings , but I felt sorry for the old fool this morning and the suggestion of therapy was simply an act of kindness for someone who's clearly struggling with his demons.

Nal, since I don't recall offering an opinion on the matter before this morning, perhaps your post would be better directed at someone else.

I wonder if you'll ever reach a point when you don't mention my name in a post? I accept you have a strange obsession, which is probably some form of Tourette's, but I'm sure if you try really hard you may be able to manage it. Failing that, you could try therapy.

As the dust settles, what has changed?

Nothing.

Sure, Noboa may have lost a bit of domestic credibility, but will that affect us? Doesn't seem likely. In fact, as others have pointed out, it may be beneficial.

NMM, I'm not sure why they were so keen to keep him, but I'd be surprised if he's contributing much.

Pbow, it was also the case that FN wanted to keep him on board.

Pbow, he did. They avoided another DC unfair dismissal charge by keeping him on as an NED.

NMM, thanks. I'm using my mobile, which I hate for reading documents.

I'm confused. Wasn't this all issued a while back? Or is it a new MD&A?

Thanks. I missed it. I wonder how they arrived at these numbers?