Member Info for Accomp

That 0.30p transaction for just 154 shares had a transaction value of just 46p. It’s ridiculous that it affected the share price.

Reported Company Holdings were that Lanstead dropped to 5% in March 2025 and 4% in May 2025, and do not feature in Simply Wall Street data today

But the news is not reaching the main media channels. A search for Oriole Resources news today only reports the results on this site and ADVFN. Not many investors is AI to search, no not surprising that even existing shareholders have sold and there is not the anticipated gain in share price. The media consultancy arrangements desperately need reviewing.

Maybe a buyer for a junior ISA, no charges on some platforms.

I agree this has been a tough week, I did not expect the reduced gold price against the background of intensive turmoil in the middle east, for some reason the Gold premium that normally applies in times of insecurity did not apply this week.

I did not sell, because earnings for year ended June 2026 could be more than 150% higher than 2025 (volume up 40% and profit margin up 80%) than 2015 year. mostly arising from the second half year we are currently in.

Ranger, your comment about management ownership is incorrect, their ownership is not around 40%, it’s more like 2% before today’s announcement, which means the additional shares are meaningful increment their holdings. Very commendable.

Where are all these funny numbers come from. Briefly the highest share last 12 months was (per HL) 0.62p, but this was an inter-day spike which never held and the highest closing value was 0.47p, is now is 0.33p. The talk of a 90% drop in this year is totally inaccurate. The good news is that the stock has risen by 46% over the last 12 months. There is a lot of volatility and the stock has more than doubled from the 12 month low point of 0.15p.

Valuation depends on sentiment, which this last week has been negatively impacted by the Gold price variation, but in reality the current price of around $4800/oz is not significantly different from the weekend price, and at these levels producing mines are now reporting significantly higher profitability and cash generation. I'm invested here because our situation the stock price is significantly below the potential value, and I am trusting the the management will succeed in communicating that massage.

I am extremely surprised that most gold producers have taken a SP hit this week, when they are likely to continue selling at prices over 30% higher than last year, even if Gold falls back to around $4500/oz, though many of the fundamentals which drive the price to $5k/oz remain to result in further Gold price increase.

Why the uncertainty, Venezuela is more than 600 miles away and separated by Colombia, Panama and Costa Rica. part of the USA rationale is Venezuela oil reserves, with USA oil interests expropriated by Venezuela.

I cannot see any recent adverse indications and the SP fall looks at odds with the +2% Gold price increase since the weekend.

Not sure I understand how the BCM JV works, especially the Earn in percentage. Can anyone explain?

My dividend income from PAF last year on HL platform was subject to a 20% withholding tax, not expecting any difference this year.

Just topped $3,815

Mike59, I agree with your forward EPS calculation of 13.5p, but based on the fact that shares were trading at 75p before the last year results released 2 weeks ago, the SP was multiple of 14 on those earnings per share of 5.3p. So I am inclined to the view that the forward PE ratio somewhat higher than 14 with the move to the main market, with the half year report in February confirming great progress perhaps seeing a share price around £1.50, and accordingly after the next full year reporting the earnings per share you predict, at a PE multiple of 16 we would be looking at a SP over £2 in a years time.

I note the suggestion of gold-miner, but which other miners have such a compelling plan or such talented management. I’m watching for other opportunities but nothing really stands out in this sector.

According to Simply Wall Street data today, Jim Mellon Holding at 12.66m shares with his holding reduced by 94.2%, so presumably most of the impact already occurred. No other significant seller appears in the data.

Gold price average exceeding $3500 improves profit per oz by 60%, and sales volume increase of 50%, leads to profit 2.4 times higher in the coming year.

In my opinion the only negative following the half year reporting the lower net income for the first half, mainly due to the cost of LTIP charges, which is non cash, and PE ratio was adversely affected. The LTIP was a significant figure which did dilute long term holders.

However the plan for getting La India operational, which looked challenging at the outset, has consistently been achieved. The biggest risk was the successful finding and movement of the plant from Alaska, where weather extremes can easily thwart such movements. Now we have a successful cash generating operation, aided by further increases in Gold price this week which has and will continue to fund the La India construction and the acquisition of further drilling capacity and testing facilities.

Clearly good progress towards completion of the La India facility and subsequent gold pour in H2 2026 are the most critical, and I believe that Dupax will be extra icing on the cake.

Whilst I do like the prospect of dividends, which add credibility to the investment proposition, (which would be lost if funded by borrowing). Consistent Profitability and asset life are the most critical components of valuation for mining investments.

I feel very fortunate in being able to hold a investment here, and appreciate DB and his teams efforts.

I am delighted to be overweighted here. Interestingly, a few weeks ago influenced by Pedro I made a small investment in both ALTN and THX, bur since then ALTN have gained just over 20%, and THX just zilch, and nothing today after their RNS. Glad I didn’t sell any MTL, my all time star winner. It looks like THX completely off the radar.

I am somewhat disappointed by the last 2 RNS. Needing extra borrowing and PDMR sales, to me these indicate that cash realisations achieved are not particularly exciting, and the PDMR sales, though quite small are proceeding without waiting on any favourable reaction to H1 results due next month. This is surprising me because there are several investments which should bring promise of excellent returns, but it seems we will have to wait a while for these to come to fruition.

Please note that whilst the maximum Argentinian settlement would be $6m plus interest, $1.5m is already booked as profit, and anything above that would have cost of incentive payments and there would be corporate taxes to pay. The Stanberry report is deficient in ignoring these factors.

Times article in the money section a waste of time. No depth of research, interviews with AJ Bell and Hargreaves Lansdown did not uncover the the fact that gold investment funds are showing the strongest returns this year, although nothing like what we see with MTL.

Dividends are favourably regarded by long term investors and reflect the board’s confidence in the sustainability of the business. The frequency of payments can be chosen and is mainly annually, half yearly, or even quarterly. They must be paid from retained profits, and ideally should financed from cash flows.

Right now LTH in MTL benefit from market appreciation, but over time investors need to have cash returned, either through dividends or through the proceeds of selling the investment.