Member Info for AB124

Please don't have another argument. I imagine this thread is doomed also. I'm sorry i made the observation that seemed to set you off Inanaco. there's no need for all this really.

I think maybe that Burble posts rather more like a scientist and also in non partisan way. This seems to make him appeal to everyone, and maybe that's his secret. It seems to me to be a good secret to know.

Equally fair comment RuckRover.

Fair comment Bunsie...

I followed Burble's posts recently and I do understand that Inanaco has a good knowledge of the science here. Why is it though that the two posters (Inanaco and Burble) have such different responses to their posts?

Crackin, thanks for the comments on the charts. I agree with your comments, there are strong signals. Many are sceptical but this week has shown the charts to be good near indicators.

Burble, If balanced posting is what we need here I think your 20.57 and 21.29 are just about as balanced and open as they get. Thankyou for such a refreshing view and so many truths tied up in a compassionate and measured response.

So will WTP get his posts restored if its not an argument or something?

That's the problem. I posted last week and they all disappeared. It's not fair. What was the post that caused it today?

9.15p was the near resistance, yes.

Medium term significant resistance is 11.4p

If two people say the shares are going up why is there a squabble?

Thanks Bermudashorts. it looks like a very useful information source, and from a reputable organisation. The video is massively useful.
Thanks again for posting the information.

Knowlesi, But as it seems everyone here is happy that Scancell share price is likely to go better (over as yet unknown time and to what level) why are such arguments. It surely doesn't matter what the end level is or over what time it takes? Nobody can know all we need to do is set our own levels and time and enjoy days like today. if the general view is good then we can wait? That's the reason I asked my original question since deleted) last week. I haven't seen anyone say the outlook isn't much better than it was. Why the arguments? we have Burble and a couple of others who was brilliant at the weekend with the science. It all looks good to me . Isn't it?

Chelsea if it happens often why does it continue if good posts are lost. It seems strange that the people who look after the Forum don't stop the loss of good informative posts or opinions. Has anyone taken this to the people who run LSE?

Maybe there could be athread headed up Todays Argument and then the worthwile posts wouldn't be lost.
To be honest, I'm probably writing out of turn but it does seem that a destructive force is at work.
Please, could a different thread altogether?

I went out and when I came back and looked on the thread there seems to be an argument on the go.
Is it possible this argument will result in a very worthwhile thread being deleted like the one my posts were taken out of last week. because of the argument? Does this happen often because there's been some very interesting points made?
It would be such a shame if it did.

I googled NXC and he came up on page 2. I will read what he has to say.

Thanks Ivyspivey.... that sounds useful, I'd like to read what he says.

Ivyspivey, you are very kind, but who is DE? Maybe I missed him when I was reading back?