Member Info for 2seabass

MGM good find - to kick things off I hope that NJ get round to voting positively on 7 June. MGM's t/o illustrates that although change in legislation is sometime away companies are forward thinking to gain first mover advantage. This I believe is why WEB directors and Mellon are excited about their licences they have held onto without any benefits to date.

Any sizeable trade will affect the sp. I can sell 250k for 5.5p yet only indicated at 5.25p to sell. Looking good again

In the RNS it states that they have 7 licences - the states of North Dakota, Washington, California, New York, Kentucky, Colorado and Minnesota. These 7 states have a combined population of approx 86 million. -that is approx 20% larger than the entire UK's population of 65.4 million. All these Americans at some stage will probably have the opportunity to wager bets on many more types of live sports. WEBIS may potentially about to become a multi billion dollar turnover company - economies of scale

this drop could just turn round in an instance

Appears mm's are just dribbling sp down on very small selling before b/hols

perhaps it may turn out that at the time of discussions MYSQ were aware of Chinese ban. Rather than do a deal immediately they hung fire until nearer the deadline in the hope of obtaining more leverage

I would anticipated that Chinese ban would actually make MYSQ more attractive (valuable) to help replace users.

We were deceived previously over accounting irregularities to claim breakeven trading, so I doubt if they now would do something as blatant as this to get cln's converted.

first time for ages MM's will quote on large amounts at 1.41 with tight spread. Obviously getting rid of cln's overhang

very, very few twigged until BBSN came onto meaningful onto risers leader board

sp stable for sometime, but looks to be ticking up soon

their plan has worked in that some have got unnerved and sold

I'm sure posts will start to fly again soon - this rise from 0.9p has held up really well - there has now been plenty of time for analysts to assess the future of WEB, so it probably points there is further increases to come.

I feel it is difficult to value Web - having been reduced to such a small m/cap this rocket rise gives me vertigo. Had the m/cap been sensible in the first place ( say $15m ) then I think we would feel a lot more comfortable at these and higher levels

can get 4.9p 100K

If WEB can generate over $400M from their licences without live gaming because it was illegal, what additional revenues with a new tech partner can be generated now it's legal

will take 500k for 4.6

Web have 34 licences according to my calculations

California will be the daddy

Pennsylvania is seeking a $10 million licensing fee, along with a state tax of 34% on gaming revenue. By comparison, Nevada � the only state before Monday that had legalized, state-sanctioned betting � pays 6.75% to the state. All states must pay a federal excise tax, which equates to about another 5%.